linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.com, hch@infradead.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	sagi@grimberg.me, avi@scylladb.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
	tom.leiming@gmail.com, Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 23:45:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170419064505.GD20053@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170414120257.8932-6-rgoldwyn@suse.de>

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 07:02:54AM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
> 
> A new bio operation flag REQ_NOWAIT is introduced to identify bio's

s/bio/block/

> @@ -1232,6 +1232,11 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int op,
>  	if (!IS_ERR(rq))
>  		return rq;
>  
> +	if (bio && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)) {
> +		blk_put_rl(rl);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
> +	}

Please check the op argument instead of touching bio.

> +	if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> +		if (!blk_queue_nowait(q)) {
> +			err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +			goto end_io;
> +		}
> +		if (!(bio->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC)) {

I don't understand this check at all..

> +			if (unlikely(!blk_queue_dying(q) && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)))

Please break lines after 80 characters.

> @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ struct request *blk_mq_sched_get_request(struct request_queue *q,
>  	if (likely(!data->hctx))
>  		data->hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(q, data->ctx->cpu);
>  
> +	if (bio && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT))
> +		data->flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT;

Check the op flag again here.

> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1538,6 +1538,8 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	rq = blk_mq_sched_get_request(q, bio, bio->bi_opf, &data);
>  	if (unlikely(!rq)) {
>  		__wbt_done(q->rq_wb, wb_acct);
> +		if (bio && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT))
> +			bio_wouldblock_error(bio);

bio iѕ dereferences unconditionally above, so you can do the same.

> @@ -1662,6 +1664,8 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_sq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	rq = blk_mq_sched_get_request(q, bio, bio->bi_opf, &data);
>  	if (unlikely(!rq)) {
>  		__wbt_done(q->rq_wb, wb_acct);
> +		if (bio && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT))
> +			bio_wouldblock_error(bio);

Same here.  Although blk_sq_make_request is gone anyway in the current
block tree..

> +	/* Request queue supports BIO_NOWAIT */
> +	queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT, q);

BIO_NOWAIT is gone.  And the comment would not be needed if the
flag had a more descriptive name, e.g. QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT_SUPPORT.

And I think all request based drivers should set the flag implicitly
as ->queuecommand can't sleep, and ->queue_rq only when it's always
offloaded to a workqueue when the BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING flag is set.

> --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> @@ -480,8 +480,12 @@ static int dio_bio_complete(struct dio *dio, struct bio *bio)
>  	unsigned i;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (bio->bi_error)
> -		dio->io_error = -EIO;
> +	if (bio->bi_error) {
> +		if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)
> +			dio->io_error = -EAGAIN;
> +		else
> +			dio->io_error = -EIO;
> +	}

Huh?  Once REQ_NOWAIT is set all errors are -EAGAIN?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-19  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-14 12:02 [PATCH 0/8 v6] No wait AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found] ` <20170414120257.8932-1-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-14 12:02   ` [PATCH 1/8] Use RWF_* flags for AIO operations Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found]     ` <20170414120257.8932-2-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19  6:37       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] nowait aio: Introduce RWF_NOWAIT Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-19  6:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]     ` <20170419063930.GB20053-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 10:30       ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found]         ` <2d816e3e-3625-7ebd-8550-68a7cc9c1a2e-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 11:03           ` Jan Kara
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] nowait aio: return if direct write will trigger writeback Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] nowait-aio: Introduce IOMAP_NOWAIT Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-19  6:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]   ` <20170414120257.8932-5-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19  7:12     ` Jan Kara
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-19  6:45   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-04-19 15:21     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-20 13:43       ` Jan Kara
2017-04-24 21:10     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-25  2:28       ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] nowait aio: ext4 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] nowait aio: xfs Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-19  6:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] nowait aio: btrfs Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found]   ` <20170414120257.8932-9-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-18 11:39     ` David Sterba
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-09 12:22 [PATCH 0/8 v7] No wait AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-05-09 12:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-05-11  7:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]     ` <20170511074451.GD15626-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-11 18:16       ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-03 18:52 [PATCH 0/8 v4] No wait AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-03 18:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-04  6:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-15 21:50 [PATCH 0/8 v3] No wait AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-15 21:51 ` [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found]   ` <20170315215107.5628-6-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-16 14:33     ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-17  2:03       ` Ming Lei
2017-03-17 12:23       ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found]       ` <eee4683d-9f44-434f-b97f-b0b24c7b3dab-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-24 11:32         ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-24 14:39           ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-16 21:31     ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-17 12:23       ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-20 17:33         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170419064505.GD20053@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=avi@scylladb.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).