linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	sagi@grimberg.me, avi@scylladb.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
	tom.leiming@gmail.com, Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:21:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3467259-675a-2723-7cf9-d4f2f067d634@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170419064505.GD20053@infradead.org>



On 04/19/2017 01:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
>> +	if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
>> +		if (!blk_queue_nowait(q)) {
>> +			err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +			goto end_io;
>> +		}
>> +		if (!(bio->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC)) {
> 
> I don't understand this check at all..

It is to ensure at the block layer that NOWAIT comes only for DIRECT
calls only. I should probably change it to REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE.

> 
>> +			if (unlikely(!blk_queue_dying(q) && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)))
> 
> Please break lines after 80 characters.
> 
>> @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ struct request *blk_mq_sched_get_request(struct request_queue *q,
>>  	if (likely(!data->hctx))
>>  		data->hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(q, data->ctx->cpu);
>>  
>> +	if (bio && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT))
>> +		data->flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT;
> 
> Check the op flag again here.
> 
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -1538,6 +1538,8 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>>  	rq = blk_mq_sched_get_request(q, bio, bio->bi_opf, &data);
>>  	if (unlikely(!rq)) {
>>  		__wbt_done(q->rq_wb, wb_acct);
>> +		if (bio && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT))
>> +			bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> 
> bio iѕ dereferences unconditionally above, so you can do the same.
> 
>> @@ -1662,6 +1664,8 @@ static blk_qc_t blk_sq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>>  	rq = blk_mq_sched_get_request(q, bio, bio->bi_opf, &data);
>>  	if (unlikely(!rq)) {
>>  		__wbt_done(q->rq_wb, wb_acct);
>> +		if (bio && (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT))
>> +			bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> 
> Same here.  Although blk_sq_make_request is gone anyway in the current
> block tree..
> 
>> +	/* Request queue supports BIO_NOWAIT */
>> +	queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT, q);
> 
> BIO_NOWAIT is gone.  And the comment would not be needed if the
> flag had a more descriptive name, e.g. QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT_SUPPORT.
> 
> And I think all request based drivers should set the flag implicitly
> as ->queuecommand can't sleep, and ->queue_rq only when it's always
> offloaded to a workqueue when the BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING flag is set.
> 

Yes, Do we have a central point (like a probe() function call?) where
this can be done?


-- 
Goldwyn

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-19 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-14 12:02 [PATCH 0/8 v6] No wait AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found] ` <20170414120257.8932-1-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-14 12:02   ` [PATCH 1/8] Use RWF_* flags for AIO operations Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found]     ` <20170414120257.8932-2-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19  6:37       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] nowait aio: Introduce RWF_NOWAIT Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-19  6:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]     ` <20170419063930.GB20053-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 10:30       ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found]         ` <2d816e3e-3625-7ebd-8550-68a7cc9c1a2e-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 11:03           ` Jan Kara
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] nowait aio: return if direct write will trigger writeback Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] nowait-aio: Introduce IOMAP_NOWAIT Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-19  6:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]   ` <20170414120257.8932-5-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19  7:12     ` Jan Kara
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-19  6:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-19 15:21     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
2017-04-20 13:43       ` Jan Kara
2017-04-24 21:10     ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-25  2:28       ` Jens Axboe
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] nowait aio: ext4 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] nowait aio: xfs Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-19  6:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-14 12:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] nowait aio: btrfs Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found]   ` <20170414120257.8932-9-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-18 11:39     ` David Sterba
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-09 12:22 [PATCH 0/8 v7] No wait AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-05-09 12:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-05-11  7:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]     ` <20170511074451.GD15626-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-11 18:16       ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-03 18:52 [PATCH 0/8 v4] No wait AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-03 18:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-04-04  6:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-15 21:50 [PATCH 0/8 v3] No wait AIO Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-15 21:51 ` [PATCH 5/8] nowait aio: return on congested block device Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found]   ` <20170315215107.5628-6-rgoldwyn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-16 14:33     ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-17  2:03       ` Ming Lei
2017-03-17 12:23       ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
     [not found]       ` <eee4683d-9f44-434f-b97f-b0b24c7b3dab-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-24 11:32         ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-24 14:39           ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-16 21:31     ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-17 12:23       ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-03-20 17:33         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3467259-675a-2723-7cf9-d4f2f067d634@suse.de \
    --to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    --cc=avi@scylladb.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).