linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	jlayton@kernel.org, Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	shuah@kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	christian@brauner.io, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, dev@opencontainers.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"cyphar@cyphar.com Linux API" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] namei: implement AT_THIS_ROOT chroot-like path resolution
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 12:10:02 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181006021002.6vzsdwd3klddbmji@ryuk> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181006021002.dNAEinuAUqklsVxSC6CmB2AT222qR-Fuor27ElxSTvc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez3FG0axt92F=+vDe1Q=kj-YngmCgFqDET7E2xCE1mOgeg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3987 bytes --]

On 2018-10-05, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
> > What if we took rename_lock (call it nd->r_seq) at the start of the
> > resolution, and then only tried the __d_path-style check
> >
> >   if (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, nd->r_seq) ||
> >       read_seqretry(&mount_lock, nd->m_seq))
> >           /* do the __d_path lookup. */
> >
> > That way you would only hit the slow path if there were concurrent
> > renames or mounts *and* you are doing a path resolution with
> > AT_THIS_ROOT or AT_BENEATH. I've attached a modified patch that does
> > this (and after some testing it also appears to work).
> 
> Yeah, I think that might do the job.

*phew* I was all out of other ideas. :P

> > ---
> >  fs/namei.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> > index 6f995e6de6b1..12c9be175cb4 100644
> > --- a/fs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/namei.c
> > @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ struct nameidata {
> >         struct path     root;
> >         struct inode    *inode; /* path.dentry.d_inode */
> >         unsigned int    flags;
> > -       unsigned        seq, m_seq;
> > +       unsigned        seq, m_seq, r_seq;
> >         int             last_type;
> >         unsigned        depth;
> >         int             total_link_count;
> > @@ -1375,6 +1375,27 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> >                                 return -EXDEV;
> >                         break;
> >                 }
> > +               if (unlikely((nd->flags & (LOOKUP_BENEATH | LOOKUP_CHROOT)) &&
> > +                            (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, nd->r_seq) ||
> > +                             read_seqretry(&mount_lock, nd->m_seq)))) {
> > +                       char *pathbuf, *pathptr;
> > +
> > +                       nd->r_seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
> > +                       /* Cannot take m_seq here. */
> > +
> > +                       pathbuf = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +                       if (!pathbuf)
> > +                               return -ECHILD;
> > +                       pathptr = __d_path(&nd->path, &nd->root, pathbuf, PATH_MAX);
> > +                       kfree(pathbuf);
> 
> You're doing this check before actually looking up the parent, right?
> So as long as I don't trigger the "path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)"
> check that you do for O_BENEATH, escaping up by one level is possible,
> right? You should probably move this check so that it happens after
> following "..".

Yup, you're right. I'll do that.

> (Also: I assume that you're going to get rid of that memory allocation
> in a future version.)

Sure. Would you prefer adding some scratch space in nameidata, or that I
change __d_path so it accepts NULL as the buffer (and thus it doesn't
actually do any string operations)?

> >                 if (nd->path.dentry != nd->path.mnt->mnt_root) {
> >                         int ret = path_parent_directory(&nd->path);
> >                         if (ret)
> > @@ -2269,6 +2311,9 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
> >         nd->last_type = LAST_ROOT; /* if there are only slashes... */
> >         nd->flags = flags | LOOKUP_JUMPED | LOOKUP_PARENT;
> >         nd->depth = 0;
> > +       nd->m_seq = read_seqbegin(&mount_lock);
> > +       nd->r_seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
> 
> This means that now, attempting to perform a lookup while something is
> holding the rename_lock will spin on the lock. I don't know whether
> that's a problem in practice though. Does anyone on this thread know
> whether this is problematic?

I could make it so that we only take &rename_lock
  if (nd->flags & (FOLLOW_BENEATH | FOLLOW_CHROOT)),
since it's not used outside of that path.

-- 
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-06  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-29 10:34 [PATCH 0/3] namei: implement various scoping AT_* flags Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 10:34 ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 10:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] namei: implement O_BENEATH-style " Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 10:34   ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 14:48   ` Christian Brauner
2018-09-29 14:48     ` Christian Brauner
2018-09-29 15:34     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 15:34       ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-30  4:38   ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-30  4:38     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-01 12:28   ` Jann Horn
2018-10-01 12:28     ` Jann Horn
2018-10-01 13:00     ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-01 13:00       ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-01 16:04       ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-01 16:04         ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-04 17:20         ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-04 17:20           ` Christian Brauner
2018-09-29 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] namei: implement AT_THIS_ROOT chroot-like path resolution Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 13:15   ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 13:15   ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests: vfs: add AT_* path resolution tests Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 13:15     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 16:35   ` [PATCH 2/3] namei: implement AT_THIS_ROOT chroot-like path resolution Jann Horn
2018-09-29 16:35     ` Jann Horn
2018-09-29 17:25     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-29 17:25       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-01  9:46       ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-01  9:46         ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-01  5:44     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-01  5:44       ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-01 10:13       ` Jann Horn
2018-10-01 10:13         ` Jann Horn
2018-10-01 16:18         ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-01 16:18           ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-04 17:27           ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-04 17:27             ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-01 10:42       ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-01 10:42         ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-01 11:29         ` Jann Horn
2018-10-01 11:29           ` Jann Horn
2018-10-01 12:35           ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-01 12:35             ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-01 13:55       ` Bruce Fields
2018-10-01 13:55         ` Bruce Fields
2018-10-01 14:28       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-01 14:28         ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-02  7:32         ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-02  7:32           ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-03 22:09           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-03 22:09             ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-06 20:56           ` Florian Weimer
2018-10-06 20:56             ` Florian Weimer
2018-10-06 21:49             ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-06 21:49               ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-01 14:00     ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-01 14:00       ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-04 16:26     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-04 16:26       ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-04 17:31       ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-04 17:31         ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-04 18:26       ` Jann Horn
2018-10-04 18:26         ` Jann Horn
2018-10-05 15:07         ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-05 15:07           ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-05 15:55           ` Jann Horn
2018-10-05 15:55             ` Jann Horn
2018-10-06  2:10             ` Aleksa Sarai [this message]
2018-10-06  2:10               ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-08 10:50               ` Jann Horn
2018-10-08 10:50                 ` Jann Horn
2018-09-29 14:25 ` [PATCH 0/3] namei: implement various scoping AT_* flags Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-29 14:25   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-29 15:45   ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 15:45     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-29 16:34     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-29 16:34       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-29 19:44       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-09-29 19:44         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-09-29 14:38 ` Christian Brauner
2018-09-29 14:38   ` Christian Brauner
2018-09-30  4:44   ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-30  4:44     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-09-30 13:54 ` Alban Crequy
2018-09-30 13:54   ` Alban Crequy
2018-09-30 14:02   ` Christian Brauner
2018-09-30 14:02     ` Christian Brauner
2018-09-30 19:45 ` Mickaël Salaün
2018-09-30 19:45   ` Mickaël Salaün
2018-09-30 21:46   ` Jann Horn
2018-09-30 21:46     ` Jann Horn
2018-09-30 22:37     ` Mickaël Salaün
2018-09-30 22:37       ` Mickaël Salaün
2018-10-01 20:14       ` James Morris
2018-10-01 20:14         ` James Morris
2018-10-01  4:08 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-01  4:08   ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-01  5:47   ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-01  5:47     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-01  6:14     ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-01  6:14       ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-01 13:28 ` David Laight
2018-10-01 13:28   ` David Laight
2018-10-01 16:15   ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-01 16:15     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-10-03 13:21     ` David Laight
2018-10-03 13:21       ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181006021002.6vzsdwd3klddbmji@ryuk \
    --to=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dev@opencontainers.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).