Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/sun4i: Rely on dma interconnect for our RAM offset

[Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>]

On 11/02/2019 15:02, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Now that we can express our DMA topology, rely on those property instead of
> hardcoding an offset from the dma_addr_t which wasn't really great.
> 
> We still need to add some code to deal with the old DT that would lack that
> property, but we move the offset to the DRM device dma_pfn_offset to be
> able to rely on just the dma_addr_t associated to the GEM object.
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> index 9e9255ee59cd..1846a1b30fea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> @@ -383,13 +383,6 @@ int sun4i_backend_update_layer_buffer(struct sun4i_backend *backend,
>   	paddr = drm_fb_cma_get_gem_addr(fb, state, 0);
>   	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Setting buffer address to %pad\n", &paddr);
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * backend DMA accesses DRAM directly, bypassing the system
> -	 * bus. As such, the address range is different and the buffer
> -	 * address needs to be corrected.
> -	 */
> -	paddr -= PHYS_OFFSET;
> -
>   	if (fb->format->is_yuv)
>   		return sun4i_backend_update_yuv_buffer(backend, fb, paddr);
>   
> @@ -835,6 +828,27 @@ static int sun4i_backend_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
>   	dev_set_drvdata(dev, backend);
>   	spin_lock_init(&backend->frontend_lock);
>   
> +	if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "interconnects", NULL)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * This assume we have the same DMA constraints for all our the
> +		 * devices in our pipeline (all the backends, but also the
> +		 * frontends). This sounds bad, but it has always been the case
> +		 * for us, and DRM doesn't do per-device allocation either, so
> +		 * we would need to fix DRM first...
> +		 */
> +		ret = of_dma_configure(drm->dev, dev->of_node, true);

It would be even nicer if we could ensure that drm->dev originates from 
a DT node which has the appropriate interconnects property itself, such 
that we can assume it's already configured correctly.

Robin.

> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * If we don't have the interconnect property, most likely
> +		 * because of an old DT, we need to set the DMA offset by hand
> +		 * on our device since the RAM mapping is at 0 for the DMA bus,
> +		 * unlike the CPU.
> +		 */
> +		drm->dev->dma_pfn_offset = PHYS_PFN_OFFSET;
> +	}
> +
>   	backend->engine.node = dev->of_node;
>   	backend->engine.ops = &sun4i_backend_engine_ops;
>   	backend->engine.id = sun4i_backend_of_get_id(dev->of_node);
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel