linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
To: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	heiko@sntech.de, xxm@rock-chips.com, robin.murphy@arm.com
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@collabora.com,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] iommu: rockchip: Add support for iommu v2
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 10:36:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521083637.3221304-5-benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210521083637.3221304-1-benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>

This second version of the hardware block has a different bits
mapping for page table entries.
Add the ops matching to this new mapping.
Define a new compatible to distinguish it from the first version.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
---
version 5:
 - Use internal ops to support v2 hardware block
 - Use GENMASK macro.
 - Keep rk_dte_pt_address() and rk_dte_pt_address_v2() separated
   because I believe that is more readable like this.
 - Do not duplicate code.

 drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
index e7b9bcf174b1..23253a2f269e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
@@ -189,6 +189,33 @@ static inline phys_addr_t rk_dte_pt_address(u32 dte)
 	return (phys_addr_t)dte & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK;
 }
 
+/*
+ * In v2:
+ * 31:12 - PT address bit 31:0
+ * 11: 8 - PT address bit 35:32
+ *  7: 4 - PT address bit 39:36
+ *  3: 1 - Reserved
+ *     0 - 1 if PT @ PT address is valid
+ */
+#define RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK_V2 GENMASK_ULL(31, 4)
+#define DTE_HI_MASK1	GENMASK(11, 8)
+#define DTE_HI_MASK2	GENMASK(7, 4)
+#define DTE_HI_SHIFT1	24 /* shift bit 8 to bit 32 */
+#define DTE_HI_SHIFT2	32 /* shift bit 4 to bit 36 */
+#define PAGE_DESC_HI_MASK1	GENMASK_ULL(39, 36)
+#define PAGE_DESC_HI_MASK2	GENMASK_ULL(35, 32)
+
+static inline phys_addr_t rk_dte_pt_address_v2(u32 dte)
+{
+	u64 dte_v2 = dte;
+
+	dte_v2 = ((dte_v2 & DTE_HI_MASK2) << DTE_HI_SHIFT2) |
+		 ((dte_v2 & DTE_HI_MASK1) << DTE_HI_SHIFT1) |
+		 (dte_v2 & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK);
+
+	return (phys_addr_t)dte_v2;
+}
+
 static inline bool rk_dte_is_pt_valid(u32 dte)
 {
 	return dte & RK_DTE_PT_VALID;
@@ -199,6 +226,15 @@ static inline u32 rk_mk_dte(dma_addr_t pt_dma)
 	return (pt_dma & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK) | RK_DTE_PT_VALID;
 }
 
+static inline u32 rk_mk_dte_v2(dma_addr_t pt_dma)
+{
+	pt_dma = (pt_dma & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK) |
+		 ((pt_dma & PAGE_DESC_HI_MASK1) >> DTE_HI_SHIFT1) |
+		 (pt_dma & PAGE_DESC_HI_MASK2) >> DTE_HI_SHIFT2;
+
+	return (pt_dma & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK_V2) | RK_DTE_PT_VALID;
+}
+
 /*
  * Each PTE has a Page address, some flags and a valid bit:
  * +---------------------+---+-------+-+
@@ -240,6 +276,29 @@ static u32 rk_mk_pte(phys_addr_t page, int prot)
 	return page | flags | RK_PTE_PAGE_VALID;
 }
 
+/*
+ * In v2:
+ * 31:12 - Page address bit 31:0
+ *  11:9 - Page address bit 34:32
+ *   8:4 - Page address bit 39:35
+ *     3 - Security
+ *     2 - Readable
+ *     1 - Writable
+ *     0 - 1 if Page @ Page address is valid
+ */
+#define RK_PTE_PAGE_READABLE_V2      BIT(2)
+#define RK_PTE_PAGE_WRITABLE_V2      BIT(1)
+
+static u32 rk_mk_pte_v2(phys_addr_t page, int prot)
+{
+	u32 flags = 0;
+
+	flags |= (prot & IOMMU_READ) ? RK_PTE_PAGE_READABLE_V2 : 0;
+	flags |= (prot & IOMMU_WRITE) ? RK_PTE_PAGE_WRITABLE_V2 : 0;
+
+	return rk_mk_dte_v2(page) | flags ;
+}
+
 static u32 rk_mk_pte_invalid(u32 pte)
 {
 	return pte & ~RK_PTE_PAGE_VALID;
@@ -480,6 +539,14 @@ static inline phys_addr_t rk_dte_addr_phys(phys_addr_t addr)
 	return addr;
 }
 
+#define DT_HI_MASK GENMASK_ULL(39, 32)
+#define DT_SHIFT   28
+
+static inline phys_addr_t rk_dte_addr_phys_v2(phys_addr_t addr)
+{
+	return (addr & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK) | ((addr & DT_HI_MASK) << DT_SHIFT);
+}
+
 static void log_iova(struct rk_iommu *iommu, int index, dma_addr_t iova)
 {
 	void __iomem *base = iommu->bases[index];
@@ -1305,10 +1372,21 @@ static struct rk_iommu_ops iommu_data_ops_v1 = {
 	.pt_address_mask = RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK,
 };
 
+static struct rk_iommu_ops iommu_data_ops_v2 = {
+	.pt_address = &rk_dte_pt_address_v2,
+	.mk_dtentries = &rk_mk_dte_v2,
+	.mk_ptentries = &rk_mk_pte_v2,
+	.dte_addr_phys = &rk_dte_addr_phys_v2,
+	.pt_address_mask = RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK_V2,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id rk_iommu_dt_ids[] = {
 	{	.compatible = "rockchip,iommu",
 		.data = &iommu_data_ops_v1,
 	},
+	{	.compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-iommu",
+		.data = &iommu_data_ops_v2,
+	},
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rk_iommu_dt_ids);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-21  8:36 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add IOMMU driver for rk356x Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21  8:36 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: Convert IOMMU to DT schema Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21  9:18   ` Heiko Stübner
2021-05-21  8:36 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: Add compatible for v2 Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21  9:18   ` Heiko Stübner
2021-05-21 11:52   ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-21  8:36 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] iommu: rockchip: Add internal ops to handle variants Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21  9:16   ` Heiko Stübner
2021-05-21 12:58   ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-21 13:38     ` Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21 14:44       ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-21  8:36 ` Benjamin Gaignard [this message]
2021-05-21  9:17   ` [PATCH v5 4/4] iommu: rockchip: Add support for iommu v2 Heiko Stübner
2021-05-21 13:42   ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210521083637.3221304-5-benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --to=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xxm@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).