From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
xxm@rock-chips.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@collabora.com,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] iommu: rockchip: Add support for iommu v2
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 11:17:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23677359.6Emhk5qWAg@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210521083637.3221304-5-benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
Am Freitag, 21. Mai 2021, 10:36:37 CEST schrieb Benjamin Gaignard:
> This second version of the hardware block has a different bits
> mapping for page table entries.
> Add the ops matching to this new mapping.
> Define a new compatible to distinguish it from the first version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
> version 5:
> - Use internal ops to support v2 hardware block
> - Use GENMASK macro.
> - Keep rk_dte_pt_address() and rk_dte_pt_address_v2() separated
> because I believe that is more readable like this.
> - Do not duplicate code.
>
> drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> index e7b9bcf174b1..23253a2f269e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
> @@ -189,6 +189,33 @@ static inline phys_addr_t rk_dte_pt_address(u32 dte)
> return (phys_addr_t)dte & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * In v2:
> + * 31:12 - PT address bit 31:0
> + * 11: 8 - PT address bit 35:32
> + * 7: 4 - PT address bit 39:36
> + * 3: 1 - Reserved
> + * 0 - 1 if PT @ PT address is valid
> + */
> +#define RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK_V2 GENMASK_ULL(31, 4)
> +#define DTE_HI_MASK1 GENMASK(11, 8)
> +#define DTE_HI_MASK2 GENMASK(7, 4)
> +#define DTE_HI_SHIFT1 24 /* shift bit 8 to bit 32 */
> +#define DTE_HI_SHIFT2 32 /* shift bit 4 to bit 36 */
> +#define PAGE_DESC_HI_MASK1 GENMASK_ULL(39, 36)
> +#define PAGE_DESC_HI_MASK2 GENMASK_ULL(35, 32)
> +
> +static inline phys_addr_t rk_dte_pt_address_v2(u32 dte)
> +{
> + u64 dte_v2 = dte;
> +
> + dte_v2 = ((dte_v2 & DTE_HI_MASK2) << DTE_HI_SHIFT2) |
> + ((dte_v2 & DTE_HI_MASK1) << DTE_HI_SHIFT1) |
> + (dte_v2 & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK);
> +
> + return (phys_addr_t)dte_v2;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool rk_dte_is_pt_valid(u32 dte)
> {
> return dte & RK_DTE_PT_VALID;
> @@ -199,6 +226,15 @@ static inline u32 rk_mk_dte(dma_addr_t pt_dma)
> return (pt_dma & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK) | RK_DTE_PT_VALID;
> }
>
> +static inline u32 rk_mk_dte_v2(dma_addr_t pt_dma)
> +{
> + pt_dma = (pt_dma & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK) |
> + ((pt_dma & PAGE_DESC_HI_MASK1) >> DTE_HI_SHIFT1) |
> + (pt_dma & PAGE_DESC_HI_MASK2) >> DTE_HI_SHIFT2;
> +
> + return (pt_dma & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK_V2) | RK_DTE_PT_VALID;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Each PTE has a Page address, some flags and a valid bit:
> * +---------------------+---+-------+-+
> @@ -240,6 +276,29 @@ static u32 rk_mk_pte(phys_addr_t page, int prot)
> return page | flags | RK_PTE_PAGE_VALID;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * In v2:
> + * 31:12 - Page address bit 31:0
> + * 11:9 - Page address bit 34:32
> + * 8:4 - Page address bit 39:35
> + * 3 - Security
> + * 2 - Readable
> + * 1 - Writable
> + * 0 - 1 if Page @ Page address is valid
> + */
> +#define RK_PTE_PAGE_READABLE_V2 BIT(2)
> +#define RK_PTE_PAGE_WRITABLE_V2 BIT(1)
> +
> +static u32 rk_mk_pte_v2(phys_addr_t page, int prot)
> +{
> + u32 flags = 0;
> +
> + flags |= (prot & IOMMU_READ) ? RK_PTE_PAGE_READABLE_V2 : 0;
> + flags |= (prot & IOMMU_WRITE) ? RK_PTE_PAGE_WRITABLE_V2 : 0;
> +
> + return rk_mk_dte_v2(page) | flags ;
> +}
> +
> static u32 rk_mk_pte_invalid(u32 pte)
> {
> return pte & ~RK_PTE_PAGE_VALID;
> @@ -480,6 +539,14 @@ static inline phys_addr_t rk_dte_addr_phys(phys_addr_t addr)
> return addr;
> }
>
> +#define DT_HI_MASK GENMASK_ULL(39, 32)
> +#define DT_SHIFT 28
> +
> +static inline phys_addr_t rk_dte_addr_phys_v2(phys_addr_t addr)
> +{
> + return (addr & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK) | ((addr & DT_HI_MASK) << DT_SHIFT);
> +}
> +
> static void log_iova(struct rk_iommu *iommu, int index, dma_addr_t iova)
> {
> void __iomem *base = iommu->bases[index];
> @@ -1305,10 +1372,21 @@ static struct rk_iommu_ops iommu_data_ops_v1 = {
> .pt_address_mask = RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK,
> };
>
> +static struct rk_iommu_ops iommu_data_ops_v2 = {
> + .pt_address = &rk_dte_pt_address_v2,
> + .mk_dtentries = &rk_mk_dte_v2,
> + .mk_ptentries = &rk_mk_pte_v2,
> + .dte_addr_phys = &rk_dte_addr_phys_v2,
> + .pt_address_mask = RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK_V2,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id rk_iommu_dt_ids[] = {
> { .compatible = "rockchip,iommu",
> .data = &iommu_data_ops_v1,
> },
> + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-iommu",
> + .data = &iommu_data_ops_v2,
> + },
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rk_iommu_dt_ids);
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 8:36 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add IOMMU driver for rk356x Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: Convert IOMMU to DT schema Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21 9:18 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-05-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: Add compatible for v2 Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21 9:18 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-05-21 11:52 ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] iommu: rockchip: Add internal ops to handle variants Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21 9:16 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-05-21 12:58 ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-21 13:38 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21 14:44 ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] iommu: rockchip: Add support for iommu v2 Benjamin Gaignard
2021-05-21 9:17 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2021-05-21 13:42 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23677359.6Emhk5qWAg@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xxm@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).