linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Domenico Andreoli <domenico.andreoli@linux.com>
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, leobras.c@gmail.com,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	alexandru.elisei@arm.com, wqu@suse.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	pgwipeout@gmail.com, ardb@kernel.org, briannorris@chromium.org,
	shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PCI: of: Clear 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:32:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210618153254.GA3191723@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YMyl31ERhGDE1yGh@m4>

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 03:55:43PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 06:12:34PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 08:04:57AM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> > > Alexandru and Qu reported this resource allocation failure on
> > > ROCKPro64 v2 and ROCK Pi 4B, both based on the RK3399:
> > > 
> > >   pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff 64bit]
> > >   pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> > >   pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: no space for [mem size 0x00100000]
> > >   pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
> > > 
> > > "BAR 14" is the PCI bridge's 32-bit non-prefetchable window, and our
> > > PCI allocation code isn't smart enough to allocate it in a host
> > > bridge window marked as 64-bit, even though this should work fine.
> > > 
> > > A DT host bridge description includes the windows from the CPU
> > > address space to the PCI bus space.  On a few architectures
> > > (microblaze, powerpc, sparc), the DT may also describe PCI devices
> > > themselves, including their BARs.
> > > 
> > > Before 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource
> > > flags for 64-bit memory addresses"), of_bus_pci_get_flags() ignored
> > > the fact that some DT addresses described 64-bit windows and BARs.
> > > That was a problem because the virtio virtual NIC has a 32-bit BAR
> > > and a 64-bit BAR, and the driver couldn't distinguish them.
> > > 
> > > 9d57e61bf723 set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for those 64-bit DT ranges, which
> > > fixed the virtio driver.  But it also set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for host
> > > bridge windows, which exposed the fact that the PCI allocator isn't
> > > smart enough to put 32-bit resources in those 64-bit windows.
> > > 
> > > Clear IORESOURCE_MEM_64 from host bridge windows since we don't need
> > > that information.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses")
> > > Reported-at: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a1e2ebc-f7d8-8431-d844-41a9c36a8911@arm.com/
> > > Reported-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> > > Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Applied with:
> > 
> >     Tested-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> >     Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >     Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > 
> > to for-linus for v5.13, thanks a lot!
> 
> Late-tested-by: Domenico Andreoli <domenico.andreoli@linux.com>
> 
> See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YMyTUv7Jsd89PGci@m4/T/#u

I updated the commit to add your report and tested-by, thanks!

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2021-06-18 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-14 23:04 [PATCH v4] PCI: of: Clear 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB Punit Agrawal
2021-06-15  8:46 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-06-16 12:48   ` Punit Agrawal
2021-06-15 21:18 ` Rob Herring
2021-06-16 12:53   ` Punit Agrawal
2021-06-16 14:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-06-16 23:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-18 13:55   ` Domenico Andreoli
2021-06-18 15:32     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210618153254.GA3191723@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=domenico.andreoli@linux.com \
    --cc=leobras.c@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
    --cc=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).