From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
To: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
wqu@suse.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PCI: of: Clear 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:18:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLhOFHwBwtMFMnuEaXsDs9sqzUPS=68t+bDnbFsfXgo+Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210614230457.752811-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 5:05 PM Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Alexandru and Qu reported this resource allocation failure on
> ROCKPro64 v2 and ROCK Pi 4B, both based on the RK3399:
>
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff 64bit]
> pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: no space for [mem size 0x00100000]
> pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
>
> "BAR 14" is the PCI bridge's 32-bit non-prefetchable window, and our
> PCI allocation code isn't smart enough to allocate it in a host
> bridge window marked as 64-bit, even though this should work fine.
>
> A DT host bridge description includes the windows from the CPU
> address space to the PCI bus space. On a few architectures
> (microblaze, powerpc, sparc), the DT may also describe PCI devices
> themselves, including their BARs.
>
> Before 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource
> flags for 64-bit memory addresses"), of_bus_pci_get_flags() ignored
> the fact that some DT addresses described 64-bit windows and BARs.
> That was a problem because the virtio virtual NIC has a 32-bit BAR
> and a 64-bit BAR, and the driver couldn't distinguish them.
>
> 9d57e61bf723 set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for those 64-bit DT ranges, which
> fixed the virtio driver. But it also set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for host
> bridge windows, which exposed the fact that the PCI allocator isn't
> smart enough to put 32-bit resources in those 64-bit windows.
>
> Clear IORESOURCE_MEM_64 from host bridge windows since we don't need
> that information.
>
> Fixes: 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses")
> Reported-at: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a1e2ebc-f7d8-8431-d844-41a9c36a8911@arm.com/
> Reported-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
I think we've beat this one to death.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-14 23:04 [PATCH v4] PCI: of: Clear 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB Punit Agrawal
2021-06-15 8:46 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-06-16 12:48 ` Punit Agrawal
2021-06-15 21:18 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2021-06-16 12:53 ` Punit Agrawal
2021-06-16 14:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-06-16 23:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-18 13:55 ` Domenico Andreoli
2021-06-18 15:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAL_JsqLhOFHwBwtMFMnuEaXsDs9sqzUPS=68t+bDnbFsfXgo+Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=leobras.c@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
--cc=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).