From: "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: "aubrey.li@linux.intel.com" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"bsegall@google.com" <bsegall@google.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"dietmar.eggemann@arm.com" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"guodong.xu@linaro.org" <guodong.xu@linaro.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
"juri.lelli@redhat.com" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxarm@openeuler.org" <linuxarm@openeuler.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"mgorman@suse.de" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"msys.mizuma@gmail.com" <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"sudeep.holla@arm.com" <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"valentin.schneider@arm.com" <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
"vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@huawei.com>,
yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
"tiantao (H)" <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a die
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:46:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fcccd7430f945e9badf693627298fdd@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210428094811.159245-1-drjones@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Jones [mailto:drjones@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 9:48 PM
> To: Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> Cc: aubrey.li@linux.intel.com; bp@alien8.de; bsegall@google.com;
> catalin.marinas@arm.com; dietmar.eggemann@arm.com;
> gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; guodong.xu@linaro.org; hpa@zytor.com; Jonathan
> Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; juri.lelli@redhat.com;
> lenb@kernel.org; Liguozhu (Kenneth) <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>;
> linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linuxarm@openeuler.org; mark.rutland@arm.com;
> mgorman@suse.de; mingo@redhat.com; msys.mizuma@gmail.com;
> peterz@infradead.org; Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>;
> rjw@rjwysocki.net; rostedt@goodmis.org; sudeep.holla@arm.com;
> tglx@linutronix.de; tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com; valentin.schneider@arm.com;
> vincent.guittot@linaro.org; will@kernel.org; x86@kernel.org; xuwei (O)
> <xuwei5@huawei.com>; yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within
> a die
>
> On 20/04/2021 12:18, Barry Song wrote:
> ...
> > Currently the ID provided is the offset of the Processor
> > Hierarchy Nodes Structure within PPTT. Whilst this is unique
> > it is not terribly elegant so alternative suggestions welcome.
> >
>
> The ACPI table offsets are consistent with how other topology IDs are
> generated. I once tried to make them a little more human friendly with
> [1], but it was nacked.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180629132934.GA16282@e107155-lin/t/
>
Ideally, we are going to check if cluster node has a valid UID,
if yes, read this ID; otherwise, fall back to use offset.
Will move to that way in next version.
> Thanks,
> drew
Thanks
Barry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-30 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-20 0:18 [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] scheduler: expose the topology of clusters and add cluster scheduler Barry Song
2021-04-20 0:18 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a die Barry Song
2021-04-28 9:48 ` Andrew Jones
2021-04-30 3:46 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) [this message]
2021-04-20 0:18 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/4] scheduler: add scheduler level for clusters Barry Song
2021-04-20 0:18 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/4] scheduler: scan idle cpu in cluster for tasks within one LLC Barry Song
2021-04-27 11:35 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-04-28 9:51 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-04-28 13:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-04-28 16:47 ` Dietmar Eggemann
[not found] ` <185746c4d02a485ca8f3509439328b26@hisilicon.com>
2021-04-30 10:42 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-05-03 6:19 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-05-03 11:35 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-05-05 12:29 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-05-07 13:07 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-05-13 12:32 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-05-25 8:14 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-05-26 9:54 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-04-20 0:18 ` [RFC PATCH v6 4/4] scheduler: Add cluster scheduler level for x86 Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2fcccd7430f945e9badf693627298fdd@hisilicon.com \
--to=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiantao6@hisilicon.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xuwei5@huawei.com \
--cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).