linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: michel@lespinasse.org, jglisse@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mgorman@suse.de,
	dave@stgolabs.net, willy@infradead.org, liam.howlett@oracle.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com,
	paulmck@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	hughd@google.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	kent.overstreet@linux.dev, rientjes@google.com,
	axelrasmussen@google.com, joelaf@google.com, minchan@google.com,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND 16/28] kernel/fork: assert no VMA readers during its destruction
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 15:56:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acf01185-0b34-0e92-770e-8417f4cc3cf3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220901173516.702122-17-surenb@google.com>

Le 01/09/2022 à 19:35, Suren Baghdasaryan a écrit :
> Assert there are no holders of VMA lock for reading when it is about to be
> destroyed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h | 8 ++++++++
>  kernel/fork.c      | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index dc72be923e5b..0d9c1563c354 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -676,6 +676,13 @@ static inline void vma_assert_write_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int pos)
>  	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(vma->vm_lock_seq != READ_ONCE(vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq), vma);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void vma_assert_no_reader(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(rwsem_is_locked(&vma->lock) &&
> +		      vma->vm_lock_seq != READ_ONCE(vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq),
> +		      vma);
> +}
> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
>  
>  static inline void vma_init_lock(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
> @@ -685,6 +692,7 @@ static inline bool vma_read_trylock(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  static inline void vma_read_unlock(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
>  static inline void vma_assert_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
>  static inline void vma_assert_write_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int pos) {}
> +static inline void vma_assert_no_reader(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 1872ad549fed..b443ba3a247a 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -487,6 +487,8 @@ static void __vm_area_free(struct rcu_head *head)
>  {
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma = container_of(head, struct vm_area_struct,
>  						  vm_rcu);
> +	/* The vma should either have no lock holders or be write-locked. */
> +	vma_assert_no_reader(vma);

I'm wondering if this can be hit in the case the thread freeing a VMA is
preempted before incrementing the mm ref count, like this:

VMA is about to be freed
write lock VMA
free vma -> call_rcu
..
<--- thread preempted
	rcu handler runs
	rcu calls __vm_area_free() <<<<<<
unlock mmap_lock and increase the mm seq count


>  	kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, vma);
>  }
>  #endif


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-09 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01 17:34 [RFC PATCH RESEND 00/28] per-VMA locks proposal Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 01/28] mm: introduce CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 02/28] mm: rcu safe VMA freeing Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 03/28] mm: introduce __find_vma to be used without mmap_lock protection Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 20:22   ` Kent Overstreet
2022-09-01 23:18     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 04/28] mm: move mmap_lock assert function definitions Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 20:24   ` Kent Overstreet
2022-09-01 20:51     ` Liam Howlett
2022-09-01 23:21       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-02  6:23     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-09-02 17:46       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 05/28] mm: add per-VMA lock and helper functions to control it Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 13:46   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-06 17:24     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 06/28] mm: mark VMA as locked whenever vma->vm_flags are modified Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 14:26   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-06 19:00     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 20:00       ` Liam Howlett
2022-09-06 20:13         ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 07/28] kernel/fork: mark VMAs as locked before copying pages during fork Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 14:37   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-08 23:57     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 13:27       ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:29         ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 08/28] mm/khugepaged: mark VMA as locked while collapsing a hugepage Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 14:43   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09  0:15     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 09/28] mm/mempolicy: mark VMA as locked when changing protection policy Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 14:47   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09  0:27     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 10/28] mm/mmap: mark VMAs as locked in vma_adjust Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 15:35   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09  0:51     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 15:52       ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 11/28] mm/mmap: mark VMAs as locked before merging or splitting them Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 15:44   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 12/28] mm/mremap: mark VMA as locked while remapping it to a new address range Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 16:09   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 13/28] mm: conditionally mark VMA as locked in free_pgtables and unmap_page_range Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 10:33   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:43     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 14/28] mm: mark VMAs as locked before isolating them Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 13:35   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:28     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 15/28] mm/mmap: mark adjacent VMAs as locked if they can grow into unmapped area Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 13:43   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:25     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 16/28] kernel/fork: assert no VMA readers during its destruction Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 13:56   ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
2022-09-09 16:19     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 17/28] mm/mmap: prevent pagefault handler from racing with mmu_notifier registration Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 14:20   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:12     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 18/28] mm: add FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK flag Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 14:26   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 19/28] mm: disallow do_swap_page to handle page faults under VMA lock Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 19:39   ` Peter Xu
2022-09-06 20:08     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-06 20:22       ` Peter Xu
2022-09-07  0:58         ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 14:26   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 20/28] mm: introduce per-VMA lock statistics Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 14:28   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:11     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 21/28] mm: introduce find_and_lock_anon_vma to be used from arch-specific code Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 14:38   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:10     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 22/28] x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 23/28] x86/mm: define ARCH_SUPPORTS_PER_VMA_LOCK Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 20:20   ` Kent Overstreet
2022-09-01 23:17     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 24/28] arm64/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 25/28] arm64/mm: define ARCH_SUPPORTS_PER_VMA_LOCK Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 26/28] powerc/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 27/28] powerpc/mm: define ARCH_SUPPORTS_PER_VMA_LOCK Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 28/28] kernel/fork: throttle call_rcu() calls in vm_area_free Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 15:19   ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-09 16:02     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-09 16:14       ` Laurent Dufour
2022-09-01 20:58 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 00/28] per-VMA locks proposal Kent Overstreet
2022-09-01 23:26   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-11  9:35     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-28  2:28       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-29 11:18         ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-02  7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-02 14:45   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-05 12:32 ` Michal Hocko
2022-09-05 18:32   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-09-05 20:35     ` Kent Overstreet
2022-09-06 15:46       ` Suren Baghdasaryan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acf01185-0b34-0e92-770e-8417f4cc3cf3@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jglisse@google.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=michel@lespinasse.org \
    --cc=minchan@google.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).