linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Martin Sperl <kernel@martin.sperl.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 15/18] spi: bcm2835: enable shared interrupt support
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:05:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdbdbc92-e6fc-4e88-ea8f-bb0bc3224b90@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b23c7a5a-a432-5af6-a7dc-0a7dfbe57712@gmx.net>

On 7/18/19 10:53 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Am 18.07.19 um 14:42 schrieb Mark Brown:
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:16:01PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>
>>> +	/* check if we got interrupt enabled */
>>> +	if (!(bcm2835_rd(bs, BCM2835_SPI_CS) & BCM2835_SPI_CS_INTR))
>>> +		return IRQ_NONE;
>>> +
>> Is that checking if the interrupt is enabled or if it is asserted?
> 
> the BCM2835 doesn't provide a SPI register, which shows that the
> interrupt has been asserted.
> 
> So i think, Martin tried to adapt the workaround from spi-bcm2835-aux
> which has the same problem.

I was about to submit a change to address that since we also have that
shared interrupt on BCM7211:

https://github.com/ffainelli/linux/commit/15d96d82bd42991dc71369128131312d5338f65c

Martin's patch is more efficient in terms of amount of register
accesses, but I am bit worried (based on the register description) that
the INTR bit is only asserted with the read FIFO crossing a certain
condition and that a TX only transfer may not be captured by that condition.

Maybe we can just check spi_controller::idling to determine if that
specific instance generated an interrupt?
-- 
Florian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-18 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-17 21:16 [PATCH RFC 14/18] HACK: pinctrl: bcm2835: Implement legacy pull for BCM7211 Stefan Wahren
2019-07-17 21:16 ` [PATCH RFC 15/18] spi: bcm2835: enable shared interrupt support Stefan Wahren
2019-07-18 12:42   ` Mark Brown
2019-07-18 17:53     ` Stefan Wahren
2019-07-18 18:05       ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2019-07-18 18:21         ` Stefan Wahren
2019-07-24 17:15           ` Mark Brown
2019-07-18 18:52       ` Mark Brown
2019-07-17 21:16 ` [PATCH RFC 16/18] dt-bindings: bcm: Add Raspberry Pi 4 B Stefan Wahren
2019-07-17 21:16 ` [PATCH RFC 17/18] ARM: bcm2835: Add bcm2838 compatible string Stefan Wahren
2019-07-17 21:16 ` [PATCH RFC 18/18] ARM: dts: Add minimal Raspberry Pi 4 support Stefan Wahren
2019-07-17 21:22   ` Florian Fainelli
2019-07-17 21:32     ` Stefan Wahren
2019-07-23 18:13   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-24  9:51     ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-07-24 10:41       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-24 12:36         ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-07-24 19:04           ` Stefan Wahren
2019-07-28 10:58     ` Stefan Wahren
2019-07-28 11:38       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-07-30 18:33         ` Stefan Wahren
2019-07-31 10:55           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-02 22:12 ` [PATCH RFC 14/18] HACK: pinctrl: bcm2835: Implement legacy pull for BCM7211 Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fdbdbc92-e6fc-4e88-ea8f-bb0bc3224b90@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=kernel@martin.sperl.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).