linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 05/29] Blk-iolatency: warn on negative inflight IO counter
       [not found] <20190829105009.2265-1-sashal@kernel.org>
@ 2019-08-29 10:49 ` Sasha Levin
  2019-08-29 10:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 06/29] blk-iolatency: fix STS_AGAIN handling Sasha Levin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-08-29 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: Liu Bo, Jens Axboe, Sasha Levin, linux-block

From: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit 391f552af213985d3d324c60004475759a7030c5 ]

This is to catch any unexpected negative value of inflight IO counter.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-iolatency.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
index f4f7c73fb8284..84ecdab41b691 100644
--- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
+++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
@@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_done_bio(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
 	u64 now = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
 	bool issue_as_root = bio_issue_as_root_blkg(bio);
 	bool enabled = false;
+	int inflight = 0;
 
 	blkg = bio->bi_blkg;
 	if (!blkg)
@@ -585,7 +586,8 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_done_bio(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
 		}
 		rqw = &iolat->rq_wait;
 
-		atomic_dec(&rqw->inflight);
+		inflight = atomic_dec_return(&rqw->inflight);
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(inflight < 0);
 		if (iolat->min_lat_nsec == 0)
 			goto next;
 		iolatency_record_time(iolat, &bio->bi_issue, now,
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 06/29] blk-iolatency: fix STS_AGAIN handling
       [not found] <20190829105009.2265-1-sashal@kernel.org>
  2019-08-29 10:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 05/29] Blk-iolatency: warn on negative inflight IO counter Sasha Levin
@ 2019-08-29 10:49 ` Sasha Levin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-08-29 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Dennis Zhou, Tejun Heo, Josef Bacik, Jens Axboe, Sasha Levin,
	linux-block

From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit c9b3007feca018d3f7061f5d5a14cb00766ffe9b ]

The iolatency controller is based on rq_qos. It increments on
rq_qos_throttle() and decrements on either rq_qos_cleanup() or
rq_qos_done_bio(). a3fb01ba5af0 fixes the double accounting issue where
blk_mq_make_request() may call both rq_qos_cleanup() and
rq_qos_done_bio() on REQ_NO_WAIT. So checking STS_AGAIN prevents the
double decrement.

The above works upstream as the only way we can get STS_AGAIN is from
blk_mq_get_request() failing. The STS_AGAIN handling isn't a real
problem as bio_endio() skipping only happens on reserved tag allocation
failures which can only be caused by driver bugs and already triggers
WARN.

However, the fix creates a not so great dependency on how STS_AGAIN can
be propagated. Internally, we (Facebook) carry a patch that kills read
ahead if a cgroup is io congested or a fatal signal is pending. This
combined with chained bios progagate their bi_status to the parent is
not already set can can cause the parent bio to not clean up properly
even though it was successful. This consequently leaks the inflight
counter and can hang all IOs under that blkg.

To nip the adverse interaction early, this removes the rq_qos_cleanup()
callback in iolatency in favor of cleaning up always on the
rq_qos_done_bio() path.

Fixes: a3fb01ba5af0 ("blk-iolatency: only account submitted bios")
Debugged-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Debugged-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-iolatency.c | 51 ++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
index 84ecdab41b691..0529e94a20f7f 100644
--- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
+++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
@@ -566,10 +566,6 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_done_bio(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
 	if (!blkg)
 		return;
 
-	/* We didn't actually submit this bio, don't account it. */
-	if (bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_AGAIN)
-		return;
-
 	iolat = blkg_to_lat(bio->bi_blkg);
 	if (!iolat)
 		return;
@@ -588,40 +584,22 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_done_bio(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
 
 		inflight = atomic_dec_return(&rqw->inflight);
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(inflight < 0);
-		if (iolat->min_lat_nsec == 0)
-			goto next;
-		iolatency_record_time(iolat, &bio->bi_issue, now,
-				      issue_as_root);
-		window_start = atomic64_read(&iolat->window_start);
-		if (now > window_start &&
-		    (now - window_start) >= iolat->cur_win_nsec) {
-			if (atomic64_cmpxchg(&iolat->window_start,
-					window_start, now) == window_start)
-				iolatency_check_latencies(iolat, now);
+		/*
+		 * If bi_status is BLK_STS_AGAIN, the bio wasn't actually
+		 * submitted, so do not account for it.
+		 */
+		if (iolat->min_lat_nsec && bio->bi_status != BLK_STS_AGAIN) {
+			iolatency_record_time(iolat, &bio->bi_issue, now,
+					      issue_as_root);
+			window_start = atomic64_read(&iolat->window_start);
+			if (now > window_start &&
+			    (now - window_start) >= iolat->cur_win_nsec) {
+				if (atomic64_cmpxchg(&iolat->window_start,
+					     window_start, now) == window_start)
+					iolatency_check_latencies(iolat, now);
+			}
 		}
-next:
-		wake_up(&rqw->wait);
-		blkg = blkg->parent;
-	}
-}
-
-static void blkcg_iolatency_cleanup(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
-{
-	struct blkcg_gq *blkg;
-
-	blkg = bio->bi_blkg;
-	while (blkg && blkg->parent) {
-		struct rq_wait *rqw;
-		struct iolatency_grp *iolat;
-
-		iolat = blkg_to_lat(blkg);
-		if (!iolat)
-			goto next;
-
-		rqw = &iolat->rq_wait;
-		atomic_dec(&rqw->inflight);
 		wake_up(&rqw->wait);
-next:
 		blkg = blkg->parent;
 	}
 }
@@ -637,7 +615,6 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_exit(struct rq_qos *rqos)
 
 static struct rq_qos_ops blkcg_iolatency_ops = {
 	.throttle = blkcg_iolatency_throttle,
-	.cleanup = blkcg_iolatency_cleanup,
 	.done_bio = blkcg_iolatency_done_bio,
 	.exit = blkcg_iolatency_exit,
 };
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-29 10:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20190829105009.2265-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-08-29 10:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 05/29] Blk-iolatency: warn on negative inflight IO counter Sasha Levin
2019-08-29 10:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 06/29] blk-iolatency: fix STS_AGAIN handling Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).