From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v2 04/11] nvme: Search for specific subsysnqn in _find_nvme_loop_dev
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:55:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39ab50dd-b117-2e53-a7ca-b390ade7dd1e@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR04MB49650C6419A84705D04FFE63860A0@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 2020-10-06 6:24 p.m., Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 10/6/20 17:10, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> With this patch or this series will I be able to write the testcase ?
>> This patch helps with that but other helpers introduced in this series
>> would require minor changes.
>>
>> As far as I can see, you'd only have to adjust _create_nvmet_passthru()
>> to take an optional argument because, presently, it always uses
>> $_test_dev_nvme_ctrl for the backing device.
>>
>> This can easily be done if and when someone writes such a test.
>>
>> However, I'm not even sure right now if that test would pass in the
>> kernel as is -- it seems like an odd thing to do.
>>
>> Logan
>>
> This test should pass if I remember the code correctly where we don't
>
> have any PCIe specific checks for the passthru controller and it is an
Yes, there's no explicit restrictions, but that doesn't mean there are no bugs
with that particular stack.
> important to support this scenario in order to write device independent
>
> testcases as rest of the testcases are.
Ok, feel free to write a test for this. It's not important to me.
Logan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-07 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-30 18:54 [PATCH blktests v2 00/11] NVMe Target Passthru Block Tests Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 01/11] common/fio: Remove state file in common helper Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 02/11] common/xfs: Create common helper to check for XFS support Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-06 23:44 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-10-06 23:51 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-07 0:58 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 03/11] common/xfs: Create common helper to verify block device with xfs Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-06 23:50 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-10-06 23:59 ` Logan Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <BYAPR04MB49652338A4FE3805F9394A88860A0@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2020-10-07 15:53 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 04/11] nvme: Search for specific subsysnqn in _find_nvme_loop_dev Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-06 23:55 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-10-07 0:10 ` Logan Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <BYAPR04MB49650C6419A84705D04FFE63860A0@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2020-10-07 15:55 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 05/11] nvme: Add common helpers for passthru tests Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-07 0:02 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-10-07 0:13 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 06/11] nvme/033: Simple test to create and connect to a passthru target Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 07/11] nvme/034: Add test for passthru data verification Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 08/11] nvme/035: Add test to verify passthru controller with a filesystem Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 09/11] nvme/036: Add test for testing reset command on nvme-passthru Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 10/11] nvme/037: Add test which loops passthru connect and disconnect Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 11/11] nvme/038: Test removal of un-enabled subsystem and ports Logan Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39ab50dd-b117-2e53-a7ca-b390ade7dd1e@deltatee.com \
--to=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).