linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: luferry <luferry@163.com>
To: "Dongli Zhang" <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Ming Lei" <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] block/mq: blk map queues by core id
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:49:33 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cf8dc67.12abe.169b441500d.Coremail.luferry@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b568440-cd06-d74c-5708-333b847e49c1@oracle.com>


After reading the code and compare pci device info.
I can reproduce this imbalance under KVM.
When enable virtio-blk with multi queues but with only 2 msix-vector.
vp_dev->per_vq_vectors will be false, so blk_mq_virtio_map_queues will fallback to virtio_mq_map_queues

Since virtual machine users cannot change the vector numbers, I think virtio_mq_map_queues should be more friendly with different cpu topology. 

448 const struct cpumask *vp_get_vq_affinity(struct virtio_device *vdev, int index)
449 {
450     struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
451
452     if (!vp_dev->per_vq_vectors ||
453         vp_dev->vqs[index]->msix_vector == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR)
454         return NULL;
455
456     return pci_irq_get_affinity(vp_dev->pci_dev,
457                     vp_dev->vqs[index]->msix_vector);
458 }

 32 int blk_mq_virtio_map_queues(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap,
 33         struct virtio_device *vdev, int first_vec)
 34 {
 35     const struct cpumask *mask;
 36     unsigned int queue, cpu;
 37
 38     if (!vdev->config->get_vq_affinity)
 39         goto fallback;
 40
 41     for (queue = 0; queue < qmap->nr_queues; queue++) {
 42         mask = vdev->config->get_vq_affinity(vdev, first_vec + queue); //vp_get_vq_affinity
 43         if (!mask)
 44             goto fallback;
 45
 46         for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
 47             qmap->mq_map[cpu] = qmap->queue_offset + queue;
 48     }
 49
 50     return 0;
 51 fallback:
 52     return blk_mq_map_queues(qmap);
 53 }








At 2019-03-23 19:14:34, "Dongli Zhang" <dongli.zhang@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 03/23/2019 02:34 PM, luferry wrote:
>> 
>> I just bought one vm , so i cannot access to hypervisor. I will try to build the environment on my desktop.
>> I'm sure about something.
>> The hypervisor is KVM and disk driver is virtio-blk.
>> [root@blk-mq ~]# dmesg |grep KVM
>> [    0.000000] Hypervisor detected: KVM
>> [    0.186330] Booting paravirtualized kernel on KVM
>> [    0.279106] KVM setup async PF for cpu 0
>> [    0.420819] KVM setup async PF for cpu 1
>> [    0.421682] KVM setup async PF for cpu 2
>> [    0.422113] KVM setup async PF for cpu 3
>> [    0.422434] KVM setup async PF for cpu 4
>> [    0.422434] KVM setup async PF for cpu 5
>> [    0.423312] KVM setup async PF for cpu 6
>> [    0.423394] KVM setup async PF for cpu 7
>> [    0.424125] KVM setup async PF for cpu 8
>> [    0.424414] KVM setup async PF for cpu 9
>> [    0.424415] KVM setup async PF for cpu 10
>> [    0.425329] KVM setup async PF for cpu 11
>> [    0.425420] KVM setup async PF for cpu 12
>> [    0.426156] KVM setup async PF for cpu 13
>> [    0.426431] KVM setup async PF for cpu 14
>> [    0.426431] KVM setup async PF for cpu 15
>> [root@blk-mq ~]# lspci |grep block
>> 00:05.0 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio block device
>> 00:06.0 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio block device
>> 
>> [root@blk-mq ~]# lscpu
>> Architecture:          x86_64
>> CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
>> Byte Order:            Little Endian
>> CPU(s):                16
>> On-line CPU(s) list:   0-15
>> Thread(s) per core:    2
>> Core(s) per socket:    8
>> 
>> [root@blk-mq ~]# ls /sys/block/vdb/mq/
>> 0  1  2  3
>> 
>> [root@blk-mq ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo |egrep 'processor|core id'
>> processor	: 0
>> core id		: 0
>> processor	: 1
>> core id		: 0
>> processor	: 2
>> core id		: 1
>> processor	: 3
>> core id		: 1
>> processor	: 4
>> core id		: 2
>> processor	: 5
>> core id		: 2
>> processor	: 6
>> core id		: 3
>> processor	: 7
>> core id		: 3
>> processor	: 8
>> core id		: 4
>> processor	: 9
>> core id		: 4
>> processor	: 10
>> core id		: 5
>> processor	: 11
>> core id		: 5
>> processor	: 12
>> core id		: 6
>> processor	: 13
>> core id		: 6
>> processor	: 14
>> core id		: 7
>> processor	: 15
>> core id		: 7
>> 
>> --before this patch--
>> [root@blk-mq ~]# cat /sys/block/vdb/mq/*/cpu_list
>> 0, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 13
>> 1
>> 2, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15
>> 3
>> 
>> --after this patch--
>> [root@blk-mq ~]# cat /sys/block/vdb/mq/*/cpu_list
>> 0, 4, 5, 12, 13
>> 1, 6, 7, 14, 15
>> 2, 8, 9
>> 3, 10, 11
>> 
>> 
>> I add dump_stack insert blk_mq_map_queues.
>> 
>> [    1.378680] Call Trace:
>> [    1.378690]  dump_stack+0x5a/0x73
>> [    1.378695]  blk_mq_map_queues+0x29/0xb0
>> [    1.378700]  blk_mq_alloc_tag_set+0x1bd/0x2d0
>> [    1.378705]  virtblk_probe+0x1ae/0x8e4 [virtio_blk]
>> [    1.378709]  virtio_dev_probe+0x18a/0x230 [virtio]
>> [    1.378713]  really_probe+0x215/0x3f0
>> [    1.378716]  driver_probe_device+0x115/0x130
>> [    1.378718]  device_driver_attach+0x50/0x60
>> [    1.378720]  __driver_attach+0xbd/0x140
>> [    1.378722]  ? device_driver_attach+0x60/0x60
>> [    1.378724]  bus_for_each_dev+0x67/0xc0
>> [    1.378727]  ? klist_add_tail+0x57/0x70
>
>I am not able to reproduce above call stack when virtio-blk is assigned 4 queues
>while my qemu cmdline is "-smp 16,sockets=1,cores=8,threads=2".
>
># cat /sys/block/vda/mq/0/cpu_list
>0, 1, 2, 3
># cat /sys/block/vda/mq/1/cpu_list
>4, 5, 6, 7
># cat /sys/block/vda/mq/2/cpu_list
>8, 9, 10, 11
># cat /sys/block/vda/mq/3/cpu_list
>12, 13, 14, 15
>
>
>I do agree in above case we would have issue if the mapping is established by
>blk_mq_map_queues().
>
>
>However, I am just curious how we finally reach at blk_mq_map_queues() from
>blk_mq_alloc_tag_set()?
>
>It should be something like:
>
>blk_mq_alloc_tag_set()
> -> blk_mq_update_queue_map()
>      -> if (set->ops->map_queues && !is_kdump_kernel())
>             return set->ops->map_queues(set);
>      -> else
>             return blk_mq_map_queues(&set->map[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT]);
>
>Wouldn't we always have set->ops->map_queues = virtblk_map_queues()?
>
>Or the execution reach at:
>
>virtblk_map_queues()
> -> blk_mq_virtio_map_queues()
>     -> if (!vdev->config->get_vq_affinity)
>            return blk_mq_map_queues(qmap);
>     -> else
>            establish the mapping via get_vq_affinity
>
>but vdev->config->get_vq_affinity == NULL?
>
>For virtio pci, get_vq_affinity is always set. Seems virtio mmio would not set
>get_vq_affinity.
>
>
>I used to play with firecracker (by amazon) and it is interesting firecracker
>uses mmio to setup virtio-blk.
>
>
>Sorry for disturbing the review of this patch. I just would like to clarify in
>which scenario we would hit this issue, e.g., when virtio-blk is based on mmio?
>
>Dongli Zhang
>
>> 
>> 
>> At 2019-03-22 19:58:08, "Dongli Zhang" <dongli.zhang@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/22/2019 06:09 PM, luferry wrote:
>>>> under virtual machine environment, cpu topology may differ from normal
>>>> physical server.
>>>
>>> Would mind share the name of virtual machine monitor, the command line if
>>> available, and which device to reproduce.
>>>
>>> For instance, I am not able to reproduce with qemu nvme or virtio-blk as I
>>> assume they use pci or virtio specific mapper to establish the mapping.
>>>
>>> E.g., with qemu and nvme: -smp 8,sockets=1,cores=4,threads=2
>>>
>>> Indeed I use three queues instead of twp as one is reserved for admin.
>>>
>>> # ls /sys/block/nvme0n1/mq/*
>>> /sys/block/nvme0n1/mq/0:
>>> cpu0  cpu1  cpu2  cpu3  cpu_list  nr_reserved_tags  nr_tags
>>>
>>> /sys/block/nvme0n1/mq/1:
>>> cpu4  cpu5  cpu6  cpu7  cpu_list  nr_reserved_tags  nr_tags
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much!
>>>
>>> Dongli Zhang
>>>
>>>> for example (machine with 4 cores, 2 threads per core):
>>>>
>>>> normal physical server:
>>>> core-id   thread-0-id  thread-1-id
>>>> 0         0            4
>>>> 1         1            5
>>>> 2         2            6
>>>> 3         3            7
>>>>
>>>> virtual machine:
>>>> core-id   thread-0-id  thread-1-id
>>>> 0         0            1
>>>> 1         2            3
>>>> 2         4            5
>>>> 3         6            7
>>>>
>>>> When attach disk with two queues, all the even numbered cpus will be
>>>> mapped to queue 0. Under virtual machine, all the cpus is followed by
>>>> its sibling cpu.Before this patch, all the odd numbered cpus will also
>>>> be mapped to queue 0, can cause serious imbalance.this will lead to
>>>> performance impact on system IO
>>>>
>>>> So suggest to allocate cpu map by core id, this can be more currency
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: luferry <luferry@163.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  block/blk-mq-cpumap.c | 9 +++++----
>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
>>>> index 03a534820271..4125e8e77679 100644
>>>> --- a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
>>>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
>>>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ int blk_mq_map_queues(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap)
>>>>  {
>>>>  	unsigned int *map = qmap->mq_map;
>>>>  	unsigned int nr_queues = qmap->nr_queues;
>>>> -	unsigned int cpu, first_sibling;
>>>> +	unsigned int cpu, first_sibling, core = 0;
>>>>  
>>>>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>>>  		/*
>>>> @@ -48,9 +48,10 @@ int blk_mq_map_queues(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap)
>>>>  			map[cpu] = cpu_to_queue_index(qmap, nr_queues, cpu);
>>>>  		} else {
>>>>  			first_sibling = get_first_sibling(cpu);
>>>> -			if (first_sibling == cpu)
>>>> -				map[cpu] = cpu_to_queue_index(qmap, nr_queues, cpu);
>>>> -			else
>>>> +			if (first_sibling == cpu) {
>>>> +				map[cpu] = cpu_to_queue_index(qmap, nr_queues, core);
>>>> +				core++;
>>>> +			} else
>>>>  				map[cpu] = map[first_sibling];
>>>>  		}
>>>>  	}
>>>>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-25 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-22 10:09 [PATCH] block/mq: blk map queues by core id luferry
2019-03-22 11:53 ` Dongli Zhang
2019-03-22 11:58 ` Dongli Zhang
2019-03-23  6:34   ` luferry
2019-03-23 11:14     ` Dongli Zhang
2019-03-25  9:49       ` luferry [this message]
2019-03-25  9:53         ` luferry
2019-03-25 13:53           ` Dongli Zhang
2019-03-25 15:17             ` luferry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7cf8dc67.12abe.169b441500d.Coremail.luferry@163.com \
    --to=luferry@163.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).