From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name,
patdung100@gmail.com, cevich@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX V2 0/7] block, bfq: series of fixes, and not only, for some recently reported issues
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 07:02:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f73edf7b-3b69-8f9e-a881-758582019421@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200203104100.16965-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
On 2/3/20 3:40 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> this the V2 of the series. The only change is the removal of ifdefs
> from around gets and puts of bfq groups. As I wrote in my previous
> cover letter, these patches are mostly fixes for the issues reported
> in [1, 2]. All patches have been publicly tested in the dev version of
> BFQ.
I'll apply this one, at least the ifdef cleanup is nice and patch
6/7 no longer makes your eyes burn!
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-03 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 10:40 [PATCH BUGFIX V2 0/7] block, bfq: series of fixes, and not only, for some recently reported issues Paolo Valente
2020-02-03 10:40 ` [PATCH BUGFIX V2 1/7] block, bfq: do not plug I/O for bfq_queues with no proc refs Paolo Valente
2020-02-03 10:40 ` [PATCH BUGFIX V2 2/7] block, bfq: do not insert oom queue into position tree Paolo Valente
2020-02-03 10:40 ` [PATCH BUGFIX V2 3/7] block, bfq: get extra ref to prevent a queue from being freed during a group move Paolo Valente
2020-02-03 10:40 ` [PATCH BUGFIX V2 4/7] block, bfq: extend incomplete name of field on_st Paolo Valente
2020-02-03 10:40 ` [PATCH BUGFIX V2 5/7] block, bfq: remove ifdefs from around gets/puts of bfq groups Paolo Valente
2020-02-03 10:40 ` [PATCH BUGFIX V2 6/7] block, bfq: get a ref to a group when adding it to a service tree Paolo Valente
2020-02-03 10:41 ` [PATCH BUGFIX V2 7/7] block, bfq: clarify the goal of bfq_split_bfqq() Paolo Valente
2020-02-03 12:18 ` [PATCH BUGFIX V2 0/7] block, bfq: series of fixes, and not only, for some recently reported issues Oleksandr Natalenko
2020-02-03 14:02 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f73edf7b-3b69-8f9e-a881-758582019421@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com \
--cc=cevich@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=patdung100@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).