linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommit
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:51:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c27d7b14-10a5-d5b8-a339-03c940955d20@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190816152019.1962-5-josef@toxicpanda.com>



On 16.08.19 г. 18:20 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
> We ran into a problem in production where a box with plenty of space was
> getting wedged doing ENOSPC flushing.  These boxes only had 20% of the
> disk allocated, but their metadata space + global reserve was right at
> the size of their metadata chunk.
> 
> In this case can_overcommit should be allowing allocations without
> problem, but there's logic in can_overcommit that doesn't allow us to
> overcommit if there's not enough real space to satisfy the global
> reserve.
> 
> This is for historical reasons.  Before there were only certain places
> we could allocate chunks.  We could go to commit the transaction and not
> have enough space for our pending delayed refs and such and be unable to
> allocate a new chunk.  This would result in a abort because of ENOSPC.
> This code was added to solve this problem.
> 
> However since then we've gained the ability to always be able to
> allocate a chunk.  So we can easily overcommit in these cases without
> risking a transaction abort because of ENOSPC.
> 
> Also prior to now the global reserve really would be used because that's
> the space we relied on for delayed refs.  With delayed refs being
> tracked separately we no longer have to worry about running out of
> delayed refs space while committing.  We are much less likely to
> exhaust our global reserve space during transaction commit.
> 
> Fix the can_overcommit code to simply see if our current usage + what we
> want is less than our current free space plus whatever slack space we
> have in the disk is.  This solves the problem we were seeing in
> production and keeps us from flushing as aggressively as we approach our
> actual metadata size usage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 19 +------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
> index 9c5f81074cd5..3d3f301bae26 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
> @@ -165,9 +165,7 @@ static int can_overcommit(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  			  enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush,
>  			  bool system_chunk)
>  {
> -	struct btrfs_block_rsv *global_rsv = &fs_info->global_block_rsv;
>  	u64 profile;
> -	u64 space_size;
>  	u64 avail;
>  	u64 used;
>  	int factor;
> @@ -181,22 +179,7 @@ static int can_overcommit(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  	else
>  		profile = btrfs_metadata_alloc_profile(fs_info);
>  
> -	used = btrfs_space_info_used(space_info, false);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * We only want to allow over committing if we have lots of actual space
> -	 * free, but if we don't have enough space to handle the global reserve
> -	 * space then we could end up having a real enospc problem when trying
> -	 * to allocate a chunk or some other such important allocation.
> -	 */
> -	spin_lock(&global_rsv->lock);
> -	space_size = calc_global_rsv_need_space(global_rsv);
> -	spin_unlock(&global_rsv->lock);
> -	if (used + space_size >= space_info->total_bytes)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	used += space_info->bytes_may_use;
> -
> +	used = btrfs_space_info_used(space_info, true);
>  	avail = atomic64_read(&fs_info->free_chunk_space);
>  
>  	/*
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-21  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-16 15:20 [PATCH 0/5] Fix global reserve size and can overcommit Josef Bacik
2019-08-16 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: change the minimum global reserve size Josef Bacik
2019-08-20 13:45   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-08-20 19:12     ` Josef Bacik
2019-08-16 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs: always reserve our entire size for the global reserve Josef Bacik
2019-08-20 14:23   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-08-20 19:13     ` Josef Bacik
2019-08-16 15:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: use add_old_bytes when updating " Josef Bacik
2019-08-20 15:33   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-08-16 15:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommit Josef Bacik
2019-08-21  6:51   ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-08-21 15:30   ` Vladimir Panteleev
2019-08-16 15:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: add enospc debug messages for ticket failure Josef Bacik
2019-08-21  6:39   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-08-22 19:18 [PATCH 0/5][v2] Fix global reserve size and can overcommit Josef Bacik
2019-08-22 19:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommit Josef Bacik
2020-01-23 16:14   ` Anand Jain
2020-01-24  0:48     ` Josef Bacik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c27d7b14-10a5-d5b8-a339-03c940955d20@suse.com \
    --to=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).