linux-coco.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Kuppuswamy,
	Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>,
	Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	tony.luck@intel.com, npmccallum@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 20/22] x86/boot: Add Confidential Computing address to setup_header
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:19:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210624031911.eznpkbgjt4e445xj@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNMLX6fbB3PQwSpv@zn.tnic>

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:22:23PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:30:43PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> > Quoting Borislav Petkov (2021-06-18 10:05:28)
> > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 08:57:12AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> > > > Don't have any strong reason to keep it separate, I can define a new
> > > > type and use the setup_data to pass this information.
> > > 
> > > setup_data is exactly for use cases like that - pass a bunch of data
> > > to the kernel. So there's no need for a separate thing. Also see that
> > > kernel_info thing which got added recently for read_only data.
> > 
> > Hi Boris,
> > 
> > There's one side-effect to this change WRT the CPUID page (which I think
> > we're hoping to include in RFC v4).
> > 
> > With CPUID page we need to access it very early in boot, for both
> > boot/compressed kernel, and the uncompressed kernel. At first this was
> > implemented by moving the early EFI table parsing code from
> > arch/x86/kernel/boot/compressed/acpi.c into a little library to handle early
> > EFI table parsing to fetch the Confidential Computing blob to get the CPUID
> > page address.
> > 
> > This was a bit messy since we needed to share that library between
> > boot/compressed and uncompressed, and at that early stage things like
> > fixup_pointer() are needed in some places, else even basic things like
> > accessing EFI64_LOADER_SIGNATURE and various EFI helper functions could crash
> > in uncompressed otherwise, so the library code needed to be fixed up
> > accordingly.
> > 
> > To simplify things we ended up simply keeping the early EFI table parsing in
> > boot/compressed, and then having boot/compressed initialize
> > setup_data.cc_blob_address so that the uncompressed kernel could access it
> > from there (acpi does something similar with rdsp address).
> 
> Yes, except the rsdp address is not vendor-specific but an x86 ACPI
> thing, so pretty much omnipresent.
> 
> Also, acpi_rsdp_addr is part of boot_params and that struct is full
> of padding holes and obsolete members so reusing a u32 there is a lot
> "easier" than changing the setup_header. So can you put that address in
> boot_params instead?

Thanks for the suggestion! I tried something like the below and that seems to
work pretty well. I'm not sure if that's the best spot or not though, it
seems like it might be a good idea to leave some padding after eddbuf in
case it needs to grow in the future. I'll look into that a bit more.

One downside to this is we still need something in the boot protocol,
either via setup_data, or setup_header directly. Having it in
setup_header avoids the need to also have to add a field to boot_params
for the boot/compressed->uncompressed passing, but maybe that's not a good
enough justification. Perhaps if the TDX folks have similar needs though.

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
index 1ac5acca72ce..0824c8646861 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
@@ -218,7 +218,8 @@ struct boot_params {
        struct boot_e820_entry e820_table[E820_MAX_ENTRIES_ZEROPAGE]; /* 0x2d0 */
        __u8  _pad8[48];                                /* 0xcd0 */
        struct edd_info eddbuf[EDDMAXNR];               /* 0xd00 */
-       __u8  _pad9[276];                               /* 0xeec */
+       __u32 cc_blob_address;							/* 0xeec */
+       __u8  _pad9[272];                               /* 0xef0 */
 } __attribute__((packed));

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam_utils.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam_utils.h
index 981fe923a59f..53e9b0620d96 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam_utils.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam_utils.h
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static void sanitize_boot_params(struct boot_params *boot_params)
                        BOOT_PARAM_PRESERVE(hdr),
                        BOOT_PARAM_PRESERVE(e820_table),
                        BOOT_PARAM_PRESERVE(eddbuf),
+                       BOOT_PARAM_PRESERVE(cc_blob_address),
                };

                memset(&scratch, 0, sizeof(scratch));

> 
> > Now that we're moving it to setup_data, this becomes a bit more awkward,
> > since we need to reserve memory in boot/compressed to store the setup_data
> > entry, then add it to the linked list to pass along to uncompressed kernel.
> > In turn that also means we need to add an identity mapping for this in
> > ident_map_64.c, so I'm not sure that's the best approach.
> > 
> > So just trying to pin what the best approach is:
> > 
> > a) move cc_blob to setup_data, and do the above-described to pass
> >    cc_blob_address from boot/compressed to uncompressed to avoid early
> >    EFI parsing in uncompressed
> > b) move cc_blob to setup_data, and do the EFI table parsing in both
> >    boot/compressed. leave setup_data allocation/init for BIOS/bootloader
> > c) keep storing cc_blob_address in setup_header.cc_blob_address
> > d) something else?
> 
> Leaving in the whole text for newly CCed TDX folks in case they're going
> to need something like that.
> 
> And if so, then both vendors should even share the field definition.
> 
> Dave, Sathya, you can find the whole subthread here:
> 
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flkml.kernel.org%2Fr%2F20210602140416.23573-21-brijesh.singh%40amd.com&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cmichael.roth%40amd.com%7C3b352c4b944c4d95bbdb08d93630d0eb%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637600405622460196%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=464O7JxibsbjC3bc0LkGcztdb4kCYH7kcQAcqohJhug%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> in case you need background info on the topic at hand.
> 
> Thx.
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpeople.kernel.org%2Ftglx%2Fnotes-about-netiquette&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cmichael.roth%40amd.com%7C3b352c4b944c4d95bbdb08d93630d0eb%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637600405622460196%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ruCM7CNgPCNPkrOoiNts1ZKi5k7JSUumln7qQMP%2BMi0%3D&amp;reserved=0

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-24  3:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-02 14:03 [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 00/22] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Guest Support Brijesh Singh
2021-06-02 14:03 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 01/22] x86/sev: shorten GHCB terminate macro names Brijesh Singh
2021-06-08 15:54   ` Venu Busireddy
2021-06-02 14:03 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 02/22] x86/sev: Define the Linux specific guest termination reasons Brijesh Singh
2021-06-08 15:59   ` Venu Busireddy
2021-06-08 16:51     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-02 14:03 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 03/22] x86/sev: Save the negotiated GHCB version Brijesh Singh
2021-06-03 19:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-08 17:35   ` Venu Busireddy
2021-06-02 14:03 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 04/22] x86/mm: Add sev_feature_enabled() helper Brijesh Singh
2021-06-05 10:50   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02 14:03 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 05/22] x86/sev: Add support for hypervisor feature VMGEXIT Brijesh Singh
2021-06-07 14:19   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-07 14:58     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 06/22] x86/sev: check SEV-SNP features support Brijesh Singh
2021-06-07 14:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-07 16:01     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-17 18:46     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-18  5:46       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 07/22] x86/sev: Add a helper for the PVALIDATE instruction Brijesh Singh
2021-06-07 15:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 08/22] x86/compressed: Add helper for validating pages in the decompression stage Brijesh Singh
2021-06-08 11:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-08 15:58     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-16 10:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 09/22] x86/compressed: Register GHCB memory when SEV-SNP is active Brijesh Singh
2021-06-09 17:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-14 12:28     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 10/22] x86/sev: " Brijesh Singh
2021-06-10  5:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-14 12:29     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 11/22] x86/sev: Add helper for validating pages in early enc attribute changes Brijesh Singh
2021-06-10 15:50   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-14 12:45     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-14 19:03       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-14 21:01         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-16 10:07           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-16 11:00             ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-16 12:03               ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-16 12:49                 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-16 13:02                   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-16 13:10                     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-16 14:36                       ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-16 14:37                         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-16 13:06                   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 12/22] x86/kernel: Make the bss.decrypted section shared in RMP table Brijesh Singh
2021-06-10 16:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 13/22] x86/kernel: Validate rom memory before accessing when SEV-SNP is active Brijesh Singh
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 14/22] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit Brijesh Singh
2021-06-11  9:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-14 13:05     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-14 19:27       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 15/22] KVM: SVM: define new SEV_FEATURES field in the VMCB Save State Area Brijesh Singh
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 16/22] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping for the SEV-ES save area Brijesh Singh
2021-06-14 10:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-14 19:34     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-06-14 19:50       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 17/22] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping for the GHCB " Brijesh Singh
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 18/22] KVM: SVM: Update the SEV-ES save area mapping Brijesh Singh
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 19/22] x86/sev-snp: SEV-SNP AP creation support Brijesh Singh
2021-06-16 13:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-16 16:13     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 20/22] x86/boot: Add Confidential Computing address to setup_header Brijesh Singh
2021-06-18  6:08   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-18 13:57     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-18 15:05       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-23  4:30         ` Michael Roth
2021-06-23 10:22           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-24  3:19             ` Michael Roth [this message]
2021-06-24  7:27               ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-24 12:26                 ` Michael Roth
2021-06-24 12:34                 ` Michael Roth
2021-06-24 12:54                   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-24 14:11                     ` Michael Roth
2021-06-25 14:48                       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-25 15:24                         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-25 17:01                           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-25 18:14                             ` Michael Roth
2021-06-28 13:43                               ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-24 13:09               ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 21/22] x86/sev: Register SNP guest request platform device Brijesh Singh
2021-06-04 11:28   ` Sergio Lopez
2021-06-09 19:24   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-11 13:16     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-06-14 17:15       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-14 18:24         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-14 13:20     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-14 17:23       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-06-14 20:50         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-18  9:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-18 13:59     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-02 14:04 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 22/22] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 13:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-30 16:26     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-01 18:03       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-01 21:32         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-03 16:19           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-05 10:39             ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-07 19:15 ` [PATCH Part1 RFC v3 00/22] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Guest Support Venu Busireddy
2021-06-07 19:17   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210624031911.eznpkbgjt4e445xj@amd.com \
    --to=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).