From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/12] ext4: mballoc: Remove useless setting of ac_criteria
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 18:03:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dbae05617519cb6202f1b299c9d1be3e7cda763.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
From: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
There will be changes coming in future patches which will introduce a new
criteria for block allocation. This removes the useless setting of ac_criteria.
AFAIU, this might be only used to differentiate between whether a preallocated
blocks was allocated or was regular allocator called for allocating blocks.
Hence this also adds the debug prints to identify what type of block allocation
was done in ext4_mb_show_ac().
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 7ac6d3524f29..9d73f61458d4 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4627,7 +4627,6 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
atomic_inc(&tmp_pa->pa_count);
ext4_mb_use_inode_pa(ac, tmp_pa);
spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
- ac->ac_criteria = 10;
read_unlock(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
return true;
}
@@ -4670,7 +4669,6 @@ ext4_mb_use_preallocated(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
}
if (cpa) {
ext4_mb_use_group_pa(ac, cpa);
- ac->ac_criteria = 20;
return true;
}
return false;
@@ -5444,6 +5442,10 @@ static void ext4_mb_show_ac(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
(unsigned long)ac->ac_b_ex.fe_logical,
(int)ac->ac_criteria);
mb_debug(sb, "%u found", ac->ac_found);
+ mb_debug(sb, "used pa: %s, ", ac->ac_pa ? "yes" : "no");
+ if (ac->ac_pa)
+ mb_debug(sb, "pa_type %s\n", ac->ac_pa->pa_type == MB_GROUP_PA ?
+ "group pa" : "inode pa");
ext4_mb_show_pa(sb);
}
#else
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-30 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-30 12:33 [PATCH v2 00/12] multiblock allocator improvements Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] Revert "ext4: remove ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan dead check in ext4_mb_check_limits" Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 16:28 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-05-31 8:57 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-02 13:45 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-06-02 16:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-05-30 12:33 ` Ojaswin Mujoo [this message]
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] ext4: Remove unused extern variables declaration Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] ext4: Convert mballoc cr (criteria) to enum Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-06 13:13 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] ext4: Add per CR extent scanned counter Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] ext4: Add counter to track successful allocation of goal length Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] ext4: Avoid scanning smaller extents in BG during CR1 Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] ext4: Don't skip prefetching BLOCK_UNINIT groups Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] ext4: Ensure ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() is called for all prefetched BGs Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-06 14:00 ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-06-27 6:51 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-28 1:33 ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] ext4: Abstract out logic to search average fragment list Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5) Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-07 10:21 ` Jan Kara
2023-06-08 14:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-06-09 10:57 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] ext4: Give symbolic names to mballoc criterias Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-07 10:39 ` Jan Kara
2023-06-09 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] multiblock allocator improvements Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1dbae05617519cb6202f1b299c9d1be3e7cda763.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).