linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, keescook@chromium.org, yzaikin@google.com,
	j.granados@samsung.com, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	ebiggers@kernel.org, jeffxu@google.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] sysctl: death to register_sysctl_paths()
Date: Tue,  2 May 2023 19:33:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230503023329.752123-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw)

Linus,

As mentioned on my first pull request for sysctl-next, for v6.4-rc1
we're very close to being able to deprecating register_sysctl_paths().
I was going to assess the situation after the first week of the merge
window.

That time is now and things are looking good. We only have one stragglers
on the patch which had already an ACK for so I'm picking this up here now and
the last patch is the one that uses an axe. Some careful eyeballing would
be appreciated by others. If this doesn't get properly reviewed I can also
just hold off on this in my tree for the next merge window. Either way is
fine by me.

I have boot tested the last patch and 0-day build is ongoing. You can give
it a day for a warm fuzzy build test result.

Luis Chamberlain (2):
  kernel: pid_namespace: simplify sysctls with register_sysctl()
  sysctl: remove register_sysctl_paths()

 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c     | 55 +++------------------------------------
 include/linux/sysctl.h    | 12 ---------
 kernel/pid_namespace.c    |  3 +--
 kernel/pid_sysctl.h       |  3 +--
 scripts/check-sysctl-docs | 16 ------------
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.2


             reply	other threads:[~2023-05-03  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-03  2:33 Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2023-05-03  2:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] kernel: pid_namespace: simplify sysctls with register_sysctl() Luis Chamberlain
2023-05-03  2:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] sysctl: remove register_sysctl_paths() Luis Chamberlain
2023-05-03 16:24 ` [PATCH 0/2] sysctl: death to register_sysctl_paths() Luis Chamberlain
2023-05-03 18:29   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-03 19:10     ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-05-03 19:23       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230503023329.752123-1-mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
    --cc=jeffxu@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yzaikin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).