From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, keescook@chromium.org, yzaikin@google.com,
j.granados@samsung.com, patches@lists.linux.dev,
ebiggers@kernel.org, jeffxu@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sysctl: death to register_sysctl_paths()
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 12:23:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgUizDLEhvHdM=7yUmdGMB--CGV1ynMSQrd0r7C06ALUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZFKxl2d+kqYN0ohG@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 12:10 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Sorry thought you don't mind a few patches, so ditched the formalities
> for the pull.
So I don't mind patches per se, and when there's a reason for them I
have no problem at all taking them.
The reason is typically something like "let's short-circuit the normal
channels just to get this trivial thing sorted out and we can forget
about it", but it can also be just a practical thing like "I'm
traveling so it would be easier if you'd just pick up this patch
directly from the mailing list".
Or it could be "I don't have a git tree since I'm not a main
developer, so I just send patches".
All of those are situations where I'll happily take patches directly.
But on the whole, when there isn't any real reason to avoid a pull
request, I'd much rather have the full thing with signature and
everything...
Linus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-03 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-03 2:33 [PATCH 0/2] sysctl: death to register_sysctl_paths() Luis Chamberlain
2023-05-03 2:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] kernel: pid_namespace: simplify sysctls with register_sysctl() Luis Chamberlain
2023-05-03 2:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] sysctl: remove register_sysctl_paths() Luis Chamberlain
2023-05-03 16:24 ` [PATCH 0/2] sysctl: death to register_sysctl_paths() Luis Chamberlain
2023-05-03 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-03 19:10 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-05-03 19:23 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wgUizDLEhvHdM=7yUmdGMB--CGV1ynMSQrd0r7C06ALUA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=jeffxu@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yzaikin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).