From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] block: Support data lifetime in the I/O priority bitfield
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 09:36:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72e07798-0a40-41a6-89cb-11a15a4db5c5@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZS0ASN6OY0KeOx+C@x1-carbon>
On 10/16/23 02:20, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> So when you say:
> "It depends on how we want the user to specify the data lifetime for
> direct I/O.", do you mean that buffered I/O should use fcntl() to specify
> data lifetime, but direct I/O should used Linux IO priority API to specify
> the same?
>
> Because, to me that seems to be how the series is currently working.
> (I am sorry if I am missing something.)
Let's drop support for passing the data lifetime in the I/O priority
field from user space as Damien proposed. The remaining question is
whether only to restore support for F_SET_RW_HINT (per inode) or also
for F_SET_FILE_RW_HINT (per file)?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-05 19:40 [PATCH v2 00/15] Pass data temperature information to UFS devices Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] block: Make bio_set_ioprio() modify fewer bio->bi_ioprio bits Bart Van Assche
2023-10-06 6:28 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-10-06 18:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-10 5:22 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-10-11 16:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-12 8:49 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-10-12 14:03 ` Niklas Cassel
2023-10-12 17:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] blk-ioprio: Modify " Bart Van Assche
2023-10-06 6:36 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-10-06 18:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] block: Support data lifetime in the I/O priority bitfield Bart Van Assche
2023-10-06 6:42 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-10-06 8:19 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-10-06 9:53 ` Niklas Cassel
2023-10-06 18:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-11 20:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-12 1:02 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-10-12 18:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-13 1:08 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-10-13 9:33 ` Niklas Cassel
2023-10-13 21:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-16 9:20 ` Niklas Cassel
2023-10-16 16:36 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2023-10-13 20:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-15 22:22 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-10-16 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-16 6:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-16 16:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] fs: Restore write hint support Bart Van Assche
2023-10-10 5:42 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-10-11 16:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-10-16 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] fs/f2fs: Restore the whint_mode mount option Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] scsi: core: Query the Block Limits Extension VPD page Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] scsi_proto: Add structures and constants related to I/O groups and streams Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] sd: Translate data lifetime information Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] scsi_debug: Reduce code duplication Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] scsi_debug: Support the block limits extension VPD page Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] scsi_debug: Rework page code error handling Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] scsi_debug: Rework subpage " Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] scsi_debug: Implement the IO Advice Hints Grouping mode page Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:41 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] scsi_debug: Implement GET STREAM STATUS Bart Van Assche
2023-10-05 19:41 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] scsi_debug: Maintain write statistics per group number Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72e07798-0a40-41a6-89cb-11a15a4db5c5@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
--cc=Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).