linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Mirosław" <emmir@google.com>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Cc: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>,
	"Andrei Vagin" <avagin@gmail.com>,
	"Danylo Mocherniuk" <mdanylo@google.com>,
	"Alex Sierra" <alex.sierra@amd.com>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Axel Rasmussen" <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Nadav Amit" <namit@vmware.com>,
	"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	"Paul Gofman" <pgofman@codeweavers.com>,
	"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>, "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Yang Shi" <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	"Yun Zhou" <yun.zhou@windriver.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [v2] fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL for efficient page table scanning
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:38:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABb0KFF6M2_94Ect72zMtaRLBpOoHjHYJA-Ube3oQAh4cXSg5w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1071d62-5c8e-1b03-d919-b3a9db520e51@collabora.com>

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 16:04, Muhammad Usama Anjum
<usama.anjum@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Fixed found bugs. Testing it further.
>
> - Split and backoff in case buffer full case as well
> - Fix the wrong breaking of loop if page isn't interesting, skip intead
> - Untag the address and save them into struct
> - Round off the end address to next page
>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
> ---
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index add21fdf3c9a..64b326d0ec6d 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -1985,18 +1989,19 @@ static int pagemap_scan_output(unsigned long
> categories,
>         unsigned long n_pages, total_pages;
>         int ret = 0;
>
> +       if (!p->vec_buf)
> +               return 0;
> +
>         if (!pagemap_scan_is_interesting_page(categories, p)) {
>                 *end = addr;
>                 return 0;
>         }
>
> -       if (!p->vec_buf)
> -               return 0;
> -
>         categories &= p->arg.return_mask;

This is wrong - is_interesting() check must happen before output as
the `*end = addr` means the range should be skipped, but return 0
requests continuing of the walk.

> @@ -2044,7 +2050,7 @@ static int pagemap_scan_thp_entry(pmd_t *pmd,
> unsigned long start,
>          * Break huge page into small pages if the WP operation
>          * need to be performed is on a portion of the huge page.
>          */
> -       if (end != start + HPAGE_SIZE) {
> +       if (end != start + HPAGE_SIZE || ret == -ENOSPC) {

Why is it needed? If `end == start + HPAGE_SIZE` then we're handling a
full hugepage anyway.

> @@ -2066,8 +2072,8 @@ static int pagemap_scan_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd,
> unsigned long start,
>  {
>         struct pagemap_scan_private *p = walk->private;
>         struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
> +       unsigned long addr, categories, next;
>         pte_t *pte, *start_pte;
> -       unsigned long addr;
>         bool flush = false;
>         spinlock_t *ptl;
>         int ret;
> @@ -2088,12 +2094,14 @@ static int pagemap_scan_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd,
> unsigned long start,
>         }
>
>         for (addr = start; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> -               unsigned long categories = p->cur_vma_category |
> -                       pagemap_page_category(vma, addr, ptep_get(pte));
> -               unsigned long next = addr + PAGE_SIZE;
> +               categories = p->cur_vma_category |
> +                            pagemap_page_category(vma, addr, ptep_get(pte));
> +               next = addr + PAGE_SIZE;

Why moving the variable declarations out of the loop?

>
>                 ret = pagemap_scan_output(categories, p, addr, &next);
> -               if (next == addr)
> +               if (ret == 0 && next == addr)
> +                       continue;
> +               else if (next == addr)
>                         break;

Ah, this indeed was a bug. Nit:

if (next == addr) { if (!ret) continue; break; }

> @@ -2204,8 +2212,6 @@ static const struct mm_walk_ops pagemap_scan_ops = {
>  static int pagemap_scan_get_args(struct pm_scan_arg *arg,
>                                  unsigned long uarg)
>  {
> -       unsigned long start, end, vec;
> -
>         if (copy_from_user(arg, (void __user *)uarg, sizeof(*arg)))
>                 return -EFAULT;
>
> @@ -2219,22 +2225,24 @@ static int pagemap_scan_get_args(struct pm_scan_arg
> *arg,
>              arg->category_anyof_mask | arg->return_mask) & ~PM_SCAN_CATEGORIES)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       start = untagged_addr((unsigned long)arg->start);
> -       end = untagged_addr((unsigned long)arg->end);
> -       vec = untagged_addr((unsigned long)arg->vec);
> +       arg->start = untagged_addr((unsigned long)arg->start);
> +       arg->end = untagged_addr((unsigned long)arg->end);
> +       arg->vec = untagged_addr((unsigned long)arg->vec);

BTW, We should we keep the tag in args writeback().

>         /* Validate memory pointers */
> -       if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, PAGE_SIZE))
> +       if (!IS_ALIGNED(arg->start, PAGE_SIZE))
>                 return -EINVAL;
> -       if (!access_ok((void __user *)start, end - start))
> +       if (!access_ok((void __user *)arg->start, arg->end - arg->start))
>                 return -EFAULT;
> -       if (!vec && arg->vec_len)
> +       if (!arg->vec && arg->vec_len)
>                 return -EFAULT;
> -       if (vec && !access_ok((void __user *)vec,
> +       if (arg->vec && !access_ok((void __user *)arg->vec,
>                               arg->vec_len * sizeof(struct page_region)))
>                 return -EFAULT;
>
>         /* Fixup default values */
> +       arg->end = (arg->end & ~PAGE_MASK) ?
> +                  ((arg->end & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE) : (arg->end);

arg->end = ALIGN(arg->end, PAGE_SIZE);

>         if (!arg->max_pages)
>                 arg->max_pages = ULONG_MAX;
>

Best Regards
Michał Mirosław

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-24 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-13 10:14 [PATCH v25 0/5] Implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-13 10:14 ` [PATCH v25 1/5] userfaultfd: UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-13 10:14 ` [PATCH v25 2/5] fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-17 17:26   ` Andrei Vagin
2023-07-18  8:18     ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-18 16:08       ` Andrei Vagin
2023-07-18 16:27         ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-13 10:14 ` [PATCH v25 3/5] tools headers UAPI: Update linux/fs.h with the kernel sources Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-13 10:14 ` [PATCH v25 4/5] mm/pagemap: add documentation of PAGEMAP_SCAN IOCTL Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-13 10:14 ` [PATCH v25 5/5] selftests: mm: add pagemap ioctl tests Muhammad Usama Anjum
     [not found]   ` <a0b5c6776b2ed91f78a7575649f8b100e58bd3a9.1689881078.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
2023-07-20 19:50     ` fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL for efficient page table scanning Michał Mirosław
2023-07-20 21:12     ` kernel test robot
2023-07-21  2:56     ` kernel test robot
2023-07-21  4:27     ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-21 14:49       ` Andrei Vagin
2023-07-21  5:43     ` kernel test robot
2023-07-21  7:18     ` kernel test robot
2023-07-21 10:48     ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-21 11:23       ` Michał Mirosław
2023-07-21 17:50         ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-22  0:22           ` Michał Mirosław
2023-07-22  0:24           ` [v2] " Michał Mirosław
2023-07-22 13:55             ` kernel test robot
2023-07-22 14:05             ` kernel test robot
2023-07-24 14:04             ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-24 14:38               ` Michał Mirosław [this message]
2023-07-24 15:21                 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-24 16:10                   ` Michał Mirosław
2023-07-25  7:23                     ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-25  9:09                       ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-25  9:11                         ` [v3] " Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-25 18:05                           ` Michał Mirosław
2023-07-26  8:34                             ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-26 21:10                               ` Michał Mirosław
2023-07-26 23:06                                 ` Paul Gofman
2023-07-27 11:18                                   ` Michał Mirosław
2023-07-27 11:21                                     ` Michał Mirosław
2023-07-27 17:15                                     ` Paul Gofman
2023-07-27  8:03                                 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-27 11:26                                   ` Michał Mirosław
2023-07-27 11:31                                     ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-07-21 11:29       ` Michał Mirosław
2023-07-21 17:51         ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-08-26 13:07     ` kernel test robot
2023-07-18 16:05 ` [PATCH v25 0/5] Implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs Rogerio Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABb0KFF6M2_94Ect72zMtaRLBpOoHjHYJA-Ube3oQAh4cXSg5w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=emmir@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.sierra@amd.com \
    --cc=avagin@gmail.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mdanylo@google.com \
    --cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pgofman@codeweavers.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yun.zhou@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).