From: Naveen Krishna Ch <naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v7] hwmon: Add amd_energy driver to report energy counters
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 09:41:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHfPSqAYBKXJkG21hqjyuRN8X+HqaX5df6ByeSRoMycBeVU48A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.20.13.2005271944560.18802@monopod.intra.ispras.ru>
Hi Alexander
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 22:29, Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 May 2020, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote:
>
> > I tried on an octa core machine, must be Renoir
> > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> > cpu family : 23
> > model : 96
>
> Yes, same here. The only difference I'm on a 6-core 4500U.
>
> > On an idle system over a period of 500secs:
> [snip]
> > Power consumed by socket: 4.53539685 W
> > Sum of power consumed by cores: 0.010953W
>
> Yes, no problem for idle readings. I'm getting 2W/package on AC and
> close to 0W on battery.
>
>
> > On an system with AVX test running over a period of 500 secs:
> >
> > At t=500sec | At t= 0 | Diff of energy
> > | in Joules | Power in Watts
> > core 0 | 649348495 | 413687530 | 235660965 |
> > 235.660965 | 0.47132193
> > core 1 | 506880081 | 294882827 | 211997254 |
> > 211.997254 | 0.423994508
> > core 2 | 454804046 | 271046127 | 183757919 |
> > 183.757919 | 0.367515838
> > core 3 | 391508712 | 237531021 | 153977691 |
> > 153.977691 | 0.307955382
> > core 4 | 410336868 | 284410079 | 125926789 |
> > 125.926789 | 0.251853578
> > core 5 | 287569732 | 192306015 | 95263717 |
> > 95.263717 | 0.190527434
> > core 6 | 185909622 | 120556152 | 65353470 |
> > 65.35347 | 0.13070694
> > core 7 | 129932006 | 95385940 | 34546066 |
> > 34.546066 | 0.069092132
> > Socket 0 | 28399099655 | 24799819931 3599279724 | 3599.27972 |
> > 7.198559448
> > Power consumed by socket: 7.198559448 W
> > Sum of power consumed by cores: 2.212968 W
> >
> > Can you confirm this.
>
> No, this isn't right. The workload is not stressing all cores, you're
> reporting 235 J for core 0 and only 35 J for core 7.
>
> If you are running the avx-turbo test, please run it like this:
>
> ./avx-turbo --iters 10000000 --spec avx256_fma_t/8
>
> This will run AVX code on all 8 cores for about 1 second. To run it for longer,
> increase the --iters argument.
I ran with all cores loaded now and i see that
sum of diff of energy consumed by all cores is greater than the diff of
socket energy consumed in 100secs.
Kindly, give me time. I will come back with some explanation or solution.
>
> Thanks.
> Alexander
--
Shine bright,
(: Nav :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-19 15:50 [PATCH 1/3 v7] hwmon: Add amd_energy driver to report energy counters Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2020-05-19 15:50 ` [PATCH 2/3 v7] hwmon: (amd_energy) Add documentation Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2020-05-19 15:50 ` [PATCH 3/3 v7] MAINTAINERS: add entry for AMD energy driver Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2020-05-22 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/3 v7] hwmon: Add amd_energy driver to report energy counters Guenter Roeck
2020-05-22 14:19 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2020-05-26 22:37 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-05-27 3:03 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2020-05-27 6:59 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-05-27 10:35 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2020-05-27 13:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-27 14:08 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-05-27 14:42 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2020-05-27 15:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-27 15:25 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-05-27 15:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-27 14:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-27 15:12 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-05-27 15:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-27 16:41 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-05-27 16:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-05-27 17:12 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-05-27 16:59 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-05-28 4:11 ` Naveen Krishna Ch [this message]
2020-06-10 20:21 ` Alexander Monakov
2020-06-16 14:46 ` Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna
2020-06-16 14:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-06-16 14:57 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHfPSqAYBKXJkG21hqjyuRN8X+HqaX5df6ByeSRoMycBeVU48A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com \
--cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=nchatrad@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).