linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, jic23@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com, denis.ciocca@st.com,
	mario.tesi@st.com, armando.visconti@st.com, martin@geanix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add wakeup-source option
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 10:27:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190913082701.GA2698@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6eb3a60f-0712-4ad7-fe3c-fd76a3ea135f@geanix.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2390 bytes --]

> 
> 
> On 12/09/2019 09.06, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> > This add ways for the SoC to wake from accelerometer wake events.
> > 
> > In the suspend function we skip disabling the sensor if wakeup-source
> > and events are activated.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v4:
> >   * More devices supports wakeup
> > 
> > Changes since v5:
> >   * None
> > 
> > Changes since v6:
> >   * None
> > 
> >   drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > index 4198ba263d03..f79978a2870f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> > @@ -1858,6 +1858,9 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, int hw_id,
> >   			return err;
> >   	}
> > +	if (dev->of_node && of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "wakeup-source"))
> > +		device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
> > +
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL(st_lsm6dsx_probe);
> > @@ -1876,6 +1879,12 @@ static int __maybe_unused st_lsm6dsx_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >   		if (!(hw->enable_mask & BIT(sensor->id)))
> >   			continue;
> > +		if (device_may_wakeup(dev) && i == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC) {
> > +			/* Enable wake from IRQ */
> > +			enable_irq_wake(hw->irq);
> > +			continue;

I guess here we need even to check hw->event_enable, don't we?

> > +		}
> > +
> >   		if (sensor->id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT0 ||
> >   		    sensor->id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT1 ||
> >   		    sensor->id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT2)
> > @@ -1908,6 +1917,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused st_lsm6dsx_resume(struct device *dev)
> >   		if (!(hw->suspend_mask & BIT(sensor->id)))
> >   			continue;
> > +		if (device_may_wakeup(dev) && i == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC) {
> > +			disable_irq_wake(hw->irq);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> This section needs to move above:

agree, and we probably do not need 'continue'. Moreover I guess we should check
hw->event_enable even here, right?

> >   		if (!(hw->enable_mask & BIT(sensor->id)))
> In the current configuration it will never be reached in event only mode
> 
> With the bug mentioned above fixed, have tested suspend/wake with and
> without FIFO enabled.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-13  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-12  7:06 [PATCH v7 0/5] enable motion events for st_lsm6dsx Sean Nyekjaer
2019-09-12  7:06 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: move interrupt thread to core Sean Nyekjaer
2019-09-12  7:06 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add motion events Sean Nyekjaer
2019-09-12  7:06 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add wakeup-source option Sean Nyekjaer
2019-09-13  6:08   ` Sean Nyekjaer
2019-09-13  8:27     ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2019-09-13  8:43       ` Sean Nyekjaer
2019-09-13  8:58         ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-09-13  9:00           ` Sean Nyekjaer
2019-09-12  7:06 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: always enter interrupt thread Sean Nyekjaer
2019-09-12  7:06 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add motion report function and call from interrupt Sean Nyekjaer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190913082701.GA2698@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=armando.visconti@st.com \
    --cc=denis.ciocca@st.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
    --cc=mario.tesi@st.com \
    --cc=martin@geanix.com \
    --cc=sean@geanix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).