RE: [PATCH v1 3/8] vfio/type1: Report PASID alloc/free support to userspace

["Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>]

> From: Alex Williamson < alex.williamson@redhat.com >
> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 2:01 AM
> To: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] vfio/type1: Report PASID alloc/free support to
> userspace
> 
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 05:32:00 -0700
> "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > This patch reports PASID alloc/free availability to userspace (e.g.
> > QEMU) thus userspace could do a pre-check before utilizing this feature.
> >
> > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       |  8 ++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c index e40afc0..ddd1ffe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > @@ -2234,6 +2234,30 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_free(struct
> vfio_iommu *iommu,
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int vfio_iommu_info_add_nesting_cap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > +					 struct vfio_info_cap *caps)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_info_cap_header *header;
> > +	struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_nesting *nesting_cap;
> > +
> > +	header = vfio_info_cap_add(caps, sizeof(*nesting_cap),
> > +				   VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_NESTING, 1);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(header))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(header);
> > +
> > +	nesting_cap = container_of(header,
> > +				struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_nesting,
> > +				header);
> > +
> > +	nesting_cap->nesting_capabilities = 0;
> > +	if (iommu->nesting) {
> > +		/* nesting iommu type supports PASID requests (alloc/free) */
> > +		nesting_cap->nesting_capabilities |= VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQS;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> >  				   unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)  { @@ -
> 2283,6 +2307,10 @@
> > static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> >
> > +		ret = vfio_iommu_info_add_nesting_cap(iommu, &caps);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +
> >  		if (caps.size) {
> >  			info.flags |= VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAPS;
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > index 298ac80..8837219 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -748,6 +748,14 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_iova_range {
> >  	struct	vfio_iova_range iova_ranges[];
> >  };
> >
> > +#define VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_NESTING  2
> > +
> > +struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_cap_nesting {
> > +	struct	vfio_info_cap_header header;
> > +#define VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQS	(1 << 0)
> > +	__u32	nesting_capabilities;
> > +};
> > +
> >  #define VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12)
> >
> >  /**
> 
> I think this answers my PROBE question on patch 1/. 
yep.
> Should the quota/usage be exposed to the user here?  Thanks,

Do you mean report the quota available for this user in this cap info as well?
For usage, do you mean the alloc and free or others?

Regards,
Yi Liu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu