From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com> To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: ptrace: disable watchpoints if hit in kernel mode Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:06:19 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <eeb4d812-2c7e-b330-da15-d205451b3883@imgtec.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170113114218.GM10569@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> Hi James, On 13.01.2017 12:42, James Hogan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 08:44:47AM +0100, Marcin Nowakowski wrote: >> If a watchpoint is hit when in kernel mode it is possible for the system >> to end up in an infinite loop processing the watchpoint. This can happen >> if a user sets a watchpoint in the kernel addess space (which is >> possible in certain EVA configurations) or if a user sets a watchpoint >> in a user area accessed directly by the kernel (eg. a user buffer >> accessed via a syscall). >> >> To prevent the infinite loop ensure that the watchpoint was hit in >> userspace, and clear the watchpoint registers otherwise. >> >> As this change could mean that a watchpoint is not hit when it should be >> (when returning to the interrupted traced task on exception exit), the >> resume_userspace path needs to be extended to conditionally restore the >> watchpoint configuration. If a task switch occurs when returning to >> userspace, the watchpoints will be restored in a typical way in the >> switch_to() handler. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com> >> --- >> arch/mips/kernel/entry.S | 9 ++++++++- >> arch/mips/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/entry.S b/arch/mips/kernel/entry.S >> index ef69a64..b15a9a9 100644 >> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/entry.S >> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/entry.S >> @@ -55,7 +55,14 @@ resume_userspace: >> LONG_L a2, TI_FLAGS($28) # current->work >> andi t0, a2, _TIF_WORK_MASK # (ignoring syscall_trace) >> bnez t0, work_pending >> - j restore_all >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS >> + li t0, _TIF_LOAD_WATCH >> + and t0, a2, t0 >> + beqz t0, 1f >> + PTR_L a0, TI_TASK($28) >> + jal mips_install_watch_registers >> +#endif > > Perhaps this should also be conditional upon EVA, otherwise the return > to userland path would get unnecessarily slower whenever watchpoints are > enabled. Unfortunately this can affect all systems regardless of EVA - whenever eg. a watchpoint is set on a userspace address accessed from kernel (eg. a user buffer passed via a syscall). I agree it's not great to add the extra overhead on the resume userspace path, but it could be really difficult to handle otherwise. An alternative is to only leave the 2nd chunk of this patch and remove this one, but then that leaves a chance that on resume userspace we could end up with a user process without watchpoints even though they should be set (until kernel re-schedules). I don't think such behaviour would be acceptable? > TBH my worry with this general approach is that it permits userland to > mess with kernel assumptions in quite controlled and unexpected ways. > For example, it allows userland to inject temporary enabling of > interrupts at any point, e.g. in a spin_lock_irq() critical section > somewhere. > > Perhaps that specific case can be worked around by having do_watch leave > interrupts disabled if they were already disabled when the exception was > taken. resume_kernel won't call preempt_schedule_irq() if IRQs are > disabled in the context being restored. > > The other issue is I think it only really considers instruction watches > (hardware breakpoints). What about if userland put a data watchpoint on > a kernel stack address that gets hit in do_watch()'s prologue (i.e. > after EXL=0)? That can't be placed in a dedicated section, and would be > tricky to specifically exclude (would fork result in a new kernel stack > pointer and also preserve watch points?), and doing so would potentially > leak the process' kernel stack pointer too (regardless of KASLR), > presumably a valuable target for an exploit. > Cheers > James > >> +1: j restore_all >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT >> resume_kernel: >> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c >> index b86ce85..d92169e 100644 >> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c >> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c >> @@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ asmlinkage void do_watch(struct pt_regs *regs) >> * their values and send SIGTRAP. Otherwise another thread >> * left the registers set, clear them and continue. >> */ >> - if (test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_LOAD_WATCH)) { >> + if (user_mode(regs) && test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_LOAD_WATCH)) { >> mips_read_watch_registers(); >> local_irq_enable(); >> force_sig_info(SIGTRAP, &info, current); >> -- >> 2.7.4 >>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com> To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: ptrace: disable watchpoints if hit in kernel mode Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:06:19 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <eeb4d812-2c7e-b330-da15-d205451b3883@imgtec.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20170123090619.kPW0Ai7fHl4KyViRhRj4k2GR28KkLIXmas80FI97rYM@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170113114218.GM10569@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> Hi James, On 13.01.2017 12:42, James Hogan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 08:44:47AM +0100, Marcin Nowakowski wrote: >> If a watchpoint is hit when in kernel mode it is possible for the system >> to end up in an infinite loop processing the watchpoint. This can happen >> if a user sets a watchpoint in the kernel addess space (which is >> possible in certain EVA configurations) or if a user sets a watchpoint >> in a user area accessed directly by the kernel (eg. a user buffer >> accessed via a syscall). >> >> To prevent the infinite loop ensure that the watchpoint was hit in >> userspace, and clear the watchpoint registers otherwise. >> >> As this change could mean that a watchpoint is not hit when it should be >> (when returning to the interrupted traced task on exception exit), the >> resume_userspace path needs to be extended to conditionally restore the >> watchpoint configuration. If a task switch occurs when returning to >> userspace, the watchpoints will be restored in a typical way in the >> switch_to() handler. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com> >> --- >> arch/mips/kernel/entry.S | 9 ++++++++- >> arch/mips/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/entry.S b/arch/mips/kernel/entry.S >> index ef69a64..b15a9a9 100644 >> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/entry.S >> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/entry.S >> @@ -55,7 +55,14 @@ resume_userspace: >> LONG_L a2, TI_FLAGS($28) # current->work >> andi t0, a2, _TIF_WORK_MASK # (ignoring syscall_trace) >> bnez t0, work_pending >> - j restore_all >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS >> + li t0, _TIF_LOAD_WATCH >> + and t0, a2, t0 >> + beqz t0, 1f >> + PTR_L a0, TI_TASK($28) >> + jal mips_install_watch_registers >> +#endif > > Perhaps this should also be conditional upon EVA, otherwise the return > to userland path would get unnecessarily slower whenever watchpoints are > enabled. Unfortunately this can affect all systems regardless of EVA - whenever eg. a watchpoint is set on a userspace address accessed from kernel (eg. a user buffer passed via a syscall). I agree it's not great to add the extra overhead on the resume userspace path, but it could be really difficult to handle otherwise. An alternative is to only leave the 2nd chunk of this patch and remove this one, but then that leaves a chance that on resume userspace we could end up with a user process without watchpoints even though they should be set (until kernel re-schedules). I don't think such behaviour would be acceptable? > TBH my worry with this general approach is that it permits userland to > mess with kernel assumptions in quite controlled and unexpected ways. > For example, it allows userland to inject temporary enabling of > interrupts at any point, e.g. in a spin_lock_irq() critical section > somewhere. > > Perhaps that specific case can be worked around by having do_watch leave > interrupts disabled if they were already disabled when the exception was > taken. resume_kernel won't call preempt_schedule_irq() if IRQs are > disabled in the context being restored. > > The other issue is I think it only really considers instruction watches > (hardware breakpoints). What about if userland put a data watchpoint on > a kernel stack address that gets hit in do_watch()'s prologue (i.e. > after EXL=0)? That can't be placed in a dedicated section, and would be > tricky to specifically exclude (would fork result in a new kernel stack > pointer and also preserve watch points?), and doing so would potentially > leak the process' kernel stack pointer too (regardless of KASLR), > presumably a valuable target for an exploit. > Cheers > James > >> +1: j restore_all >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT >> resume_kernel: >> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c >> index b86ce85..d92169e 100644 >> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c >> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c >> @@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ asmlinkage void do_watch(struct pt_regs *regs) >> * their values and send SIGTRAP. Otherwise another thread >> * left the registers set, clear them and continue. >> */ >> - if (test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_LOAD_WATCH)) { >> + if (user_mode(regs) && test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_LOAD_WATCH)) { >> mips_read_watch_registers(); >> local_irq_enable(); >> force_sig_info(SIGTRAP, &info, current); >> -- >> 2.7.4 >>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-23 9:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-01-13 7:44 [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: ptrace: protect watchpoint handling code from setting watchpoints Marcin Nowakowski 2017-01-13 7:44 ` Marcin Nowakowski 2017-01-13 7:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: ptrace: disable watchpoints if hit in kernel mode Marcin Nowakowski 2017-01-13 7:44 ` Marcin Nowakowski 2017-01-13 11:42 ` James Hogan 2017-01-13 11:42 ` James Hogan 2017-01-23 9:06 ` Marcin Nowakowski [this message] 2017-01-23 9:06 ` Marcin Nowakowski 2017-01-13 11:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: ptrace: protect watchpoint handling code from setting watchpoints James Hogan 2017-01-13 11:11 ` James Hogan 2017-01-13 11:33 ` Marcin Nowakowski 2017-01-13 11:33 ` Marcin Nowakowski
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=eeb4d812-2c7e-b330-da15-d205451b3883@imgtec.com \ --to=marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com \ --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \ --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \ --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).