From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Rohan Puri <rohan.puri15@gmail.com>,
Mcgrof Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
"Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/compaction: add support for >0 order folio memory compaction.
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 17:37:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <025b7e7c-b17f-47c7-8677-ee36fc6dbc52@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202161554.565023-3-zi.yan@sent.com>
On 2/2/24 17:15, Zi Yan wrote:
> From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>
> Before last commit, memory compaction only migrates order-0 folios and
> skips >0 order folios. Last commit splits all >0 order folios during
> compaction. This commit migrates >0 order folios during compaction by
> keeping isolated free pages at their original size without splitting them
> into order-0 pages and using them directly during migration process.
>
> What is different from the prior implementation:
> 1. All isolated free pages are kept in a NR_PAGE_ORDERS array of page
> lists, where each page list stores free pages in the same order.
> 2. All free pages are not post_alloc_hook() processed nor buddy pages,
> although their orders are stored in first page's private like buddy
> pages.
> 3. During migration, in new page allocation time (i.e., in
> compaction_alloc()), free pages are then processed by post_alloc_hook().
> When migration fails and a new page is returned (i.e., in
> compaction_free()), free pages are restored by reversing the
> post_alloc_hook() operations using newly added
> free_pages_prepare_fpi_none().
>
> Step 3 is done for a latter optimization that splitting and/or merging free
> pages during compaction becomes easier.
>
> Note: without splitting free pages, compaction can end prematurely due to
> migration will return -ENOMEM even if there is free pages. This happens
> when no order-0 free page exist and compaction_alloc() return NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
...
> /*
> @@ -1835,9 +1857,17 @@ static struct folio *compaction_alloc(struct folio *src, unsigned long data)
> static void compaction_free(struct folio *dst, unsigned long data)
> {
> struct compact_control *cc = (struct compact_control *)data;
> + int order = folio_order(dst);
> + struct page *page = &dst->page;
> +
> + folio_set_count(dst, 0);
We can't change refcount to 0 like this, after it was already set to 1 and
somebody else might have done get_page_unless_zero(). You need to either
put_page_testzero() and if it's false, consider the page lost, or leave it
refcounted and adjust the code to handle both refcounted and non-refcounted
pages on the lists (the first option is simpler and shouldn't be too bad).
Perhaps folio_set_count()/set_page_count() should get some comment warning
against this kind of mistake.
> + free_pages_prepare_fpi_none(page, order);
>
> - list_add(&dst->lru, &cc->freepages);
> - cc->nr_freepages++;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dst->lru);
> +
> + list_add(&dst->lru, &cc->freepages[order].pages);
> + cc->freepages[order].nr_pages++;
> + cc->nr_freepages += 1 << order;
> }
>
...
>
> extern void free_unref_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
> @@ -473,6 +475,11 @@ int split_free_page(struct page *free_page,
> /*
> * in mm/compaction.c
> */
> +
> +struct page_list {
> + struct list_head pages;
> + unsigned long nr_pages;
I've checked and even with patch 3/3 I don't think you actually need the
counter? The only check of the counter I noticed was to check for
zero/non-zero, and you could use list_empty() instead.
> +};
> /*
> * compact_control is used to track pages being migrated and the free pages
> * they are being migrated to during memory compaction. The free_pfn starts
> @@ -481,7 +488,7 @@ int split_free_page(struct page *free_page,
> * completes when free_pfn <= migrate_pfn
> */
> struct compact_control {
> - struct list_head freepages; /* List of free pages to migrate to */
> + struct page_list freepages[NR_PAGE_ORDERS]; /* List of free pages to migrate to */
> struct list_head migratepages; /* List of pages being migrated */
> unsigned int nr_freepages; /* Number of isolated free pages */
> unsigned int nr_migratepages; /* Number of pages to migrate */
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 5be4cd8f6b5a..c7c135e6d5ee 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1179,6 +1179,12 @@ static __always_inline bool free_pages_prepare(struct page *page,
> return true;
> }
>
> +__always_inline bool free_pages_prepare_fpi_none(struct page *page,
> + unsigned int order)
> +{
> + return free_pages_prepare(page, order, FPI_NONE);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Frees a number of pages from the PCP lists
> * Assumes all pages on list are in same zone.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 16:15 [PATCH v3 0/3] Enable >0 order folio memory compaction Zi Yan
2024-02-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/compaction: enable compacting >0 order folios Zi Yan
2024-02-09 14:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 19:25 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-09 20:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 20:44 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/compaction: add support for >0 order folio memory compaction Zi Yan
2024-02-09 16:37 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2024-02-09 19:36 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-09 19:40 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-09 20:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 20:47 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-09 21:58 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/compaction: optimize >0 order folio compaction with free page split Zi Yan
2024-02-09 18:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 19:57 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-09 20:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-02 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Enable >0 order folio memory compaction Luis Chamberlain
2024-02-02 20:12 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-05 8:16 ` Baolin Wang
2024-02-05 14:18 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=025b7e7c-b17f-47c7-8677-ee36fc6dbc52@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=rohan.puri15@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).