From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"Tamas K Lengyel" <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
"Mathieu Tarral" <mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com>,
"Samuel Laurén" <samuel.lauren@iki.fi>,
"Patrick Colp" <patrick.colp@oracle.com>,
"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Weijiang Yang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
Zhang@kvack.org, "Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>,
"Nicușor Cîțu" <ncitu@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 15/92] kvm: introspection: handle vCPU related introspection commands
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:59:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809160047.8319-16-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809160047.8319-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>
From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Following the common structure used for all messages (kvmi_msg_hdr), all
vCPU related commands have another common structure (kvmi_vcpu_hdr). This
allows the receiving worker to validate and dispatch the message to the
proper vCPU (adding the handling function to its jobs list).
Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Nicușor Cîțu <ncitu@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicușor Cîțu <ncitu@bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst | 8 ++
include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h | 4 +-
include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h | 6 ++
virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h | 3 +
virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
5 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
index a660def20b23..7f3c4f8fce63 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -232,6 +232,14 @@ The following C structures are meant to be used directly when communicating
over the wire. The peer that detects any size mismatch should simply close
the connection and report the error.
+The commands related to vCPU-s start with::
+
+ struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr {
+ __u16 vcpu;
+ __u16 padding1;
+ __u32 padding2;
+ }
+
1. KVMI_GET_VERSION
-------------------
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
index 6c0ce49931e5..54c0e20f5b64 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
@@ -10,13 +10,15 @@
* - kvm_para_available
*/
-/* Return values for hypercalls */
+/* Return values for hypercalls and VM introspection */
#define KVM_ENOSYS 1000
#define KVM_EFAULT EFAULT
#define KVM_EINVAL EINVAL
#define KVM_E2BIG E2BIG
#define KVM_EPERM EPERM
#define KVM_EOPNOTSUPP 95
+#define KVM_EAGAIN 11
+#define KVM_ENOMEM ENOMEM
#define KVM_HC_VAPIC_POLL_IRQ 1
#define KVM_HC_MMU_OP 2
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
index ff35faabb7ed..29452da818e3 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -114,4 +114,10 @@ struct kvmi_control_vm_events {
__u32 padding2;
};
+struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr {
+ __u16 vcpu;
+ __u16 padding1;
+ __u32 padding2;
+};
+
#endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
index 47418e9a86f6..33ea05cb99af 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
@@ -118,5 +118,8 @@ void *kvmi_msg_alloc_check(size_t size);
void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr);
int kvmi_cmd_control_vm_events(struct kvmi *ikvm, unsigned int event_id,
bool enable);
+int kvmi_add_job(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ void (*fct)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void *ctx),
+ void *ctx, void (*free_fct)(void *ctx));
#endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
index a55c9e35be36..2728e6870d47 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -8,6 +8,18 @@
#include <linux/net.h>
#include "kvmi_int.h"
+typedef int (*vcpu_reply_fct)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int err,
+ const void *rpl, size_t rpl_size);
+
+struct kvmi_vcpu_cmd {
+ vcpu_reply_fct reply_cb;
+ struct {
+ struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+ struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr cmd;
+ } *msg;
+};
+
static const char *const msg_IDs[] = {
[KVMI_CHECK_COMMAND] = "KVMI_CHECK_COMMAND",
[KVMI_CHECK_EVENT] = "KVMI_CHECK_EVENT",
@@ -165,6 +177,23 @@ static int kvmi_msg_vm_maybe_reply(struct kvmi *ikvm,
return kvmi_msg_vm_reply(ikvm, msg, err, rpl, rpl_size);
}
+int kvmi_msg_vcpu_reply(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int err,
+ const void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+ return kvmi_msg_reply(IKVM(vcpu->kvm), msg, err, rpl, rpl_size);
+}
+
+int kvmi_msg_vcpu_drop_reply(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int err,
+ const void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+ if (!kvmi_validate_no_reply(IKVM(vcpu->kvm), msg, rpl_size, err))
+ return -KVM_EINVAL;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int handle_get_version(struct kvmi *ikvm,
const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, const void *req)
{
@@ -248,6 +277,23 @@ static int handle_control_vm_events(struct kvmi *ikvm,
return kvmi_msg_vm_maybe_reply(ikvm, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
}
+static int kvmi_get_vcpu(struct kvmi *ikvm, unsigned int vcpu_idx,
+ struct kvm_vcpu **dest)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = ikvm->kvm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+
+ if (vcpu_idx >= atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus))
+ return -KVM_EINVAL;
+
+ vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_idx);
+ if (!vcpu)
+ return -KVM_EINVAL;
+
+ *dest = vcpu;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int handle_control_cmd_response(struct kvmi *ikvm,
const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
const void *_req)
@@ -273,6 +319,11 @@ static int handle_control_cmd_response(struct kvmi *ikvm,
return err;
}
+static bool invalid_vcpu_hdr(const struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr *hdr)
+{
+ return hdr->padding1 || hdr->padding2;
+}
+
/*
* These commands are executed on the receiving thread/worker.
*/
@@ -286,16 +337,66 @@ static int(*const msg_vm[])(struct kvmi *, const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *,
[KVMI_GET_VERSION] = handle_get_version,
};
+/*
+ * These commands are executed on the vCPU thread. The receiving thread
+ * passes the messages using a newly allocated 'struct kvmi_vcpu_cmd'
+ * and signals the vCPU to handle the command (which includes
+ * sending back the reply).
+ */
+static int(*const msg_vcpu[])(struct kvm_vcpu *,
+ const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *, const void *,
+ vcpu_reply_fct) = {
+};
+
+static void kvmi_job_vcpu_cmd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void *_ctx)
+{
+ const struct kvmi_vcpu_cmd *ctx = _ctx;
+ size_t id = ctx->msg->hdr.id;
+ int err;
+
+ err = msg_vcpu[id](vcpu, &ctx->msg->hdr, ctx->msg + 1, ctx->reply_cb);
+
+ if (err) {
+ struct kvmi *ikvm = IKVM(vcpu->kvm);
+
+ kvmi_err(ikvm,
+ "%s: cmd id: %zu (%s), err: %d\n", __func__,
+ id, id2str(id), err);
+ kvmi_sock_shutdown(ikvm);
+ }
+}
+
+static void kvmi_free_ctx(void *_ctx)
+{
+ const struct kvmi_vcpu_cmd *ctx = _ctx;
+
+ kvmi_msg_free(ctx->msg);
+ kfree(ctx);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_queue_to_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct kvmi_vcpu_cmd *cmd)
+{
+ return kvmi_add_job(vcpu, kvmi_job_vcpu_cmd, (void *)cmd,
+ kvmi_free_ctx);
+}
+
static bool is_vm_message(u16 id)
{
return id < ARRAY_SIZE(msg_vm) && !!msg_vm[id];
}
+static bool is_vcpu_message(u16 id)
+{
+ return id < ARRAY_SIZE(msg_vcpu) && !!msg_vcpu[id];
+}
+
static bool is_unsupported_message(u16 id)
{
bool supported;
- supported = is_known_message(id) && is_vm_message(id);
+ supported = is_known_message(id) &&
+ (is_vm_message(id) || is_vcpu_message(id));
return !supported;
}
@@ -364,12 +465,66 @@ static int kvmi_msg_dispatch_vm_cmd(struct kvmi *ikvm,
return msg_vm[msg->id](ikvm, msg, msg + 1);
}
+static int kvmi_msg_dispatch_vcpu_job(struct kvmi *ikvm,
+ struct kvmi_vcpu_cmd *job,
+ bool *queued)
+{
+ struct kvmi_msg_hdr *hdr = &job->msg->hdr;
+ struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr *cmd = &job->msg->cmd;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
+ int err;
+
+ if (invalid_vcpu_hdr(cmd))
+ return -KVM_EINVAL;
+
+ err = kvmi_get_vcpu(ikvm, cmd->vcpu, &vcpu);
+
+ if (!err && vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED)
+ err = -KVM_EAGAIN;
+
+ if (err)
+ return kvmi_msg_vm_maybe_reply(ikvm, hdr, err, NULL, 0);
+
+ err = kvmi_msg_queue_to_vcpu(vcpu, job);
+ if (!err)
+ *queued = true;
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_dispatch_vcpu_msg(struct kvmi *ikvm,
+ struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+ bool *queued)
+{
+ struct kvmi_vcpu_cmd *job_msg;
+ int err;
+
+ job_msg = kzalloc(sizeof(*job_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!job_msg)
+ return -KVM_ENOMEM;
+
+ job_msg->reply_cb = ikvm->cmd_reply_disabled
+ ? kvmi_msg_vcpu_drop_reply
+ : kvmi_msg_vcpu_reply;
+ job_msg->msg = (void *)msg;
+
+ err = kvmi_msg_dispatch_vcpu_job(ikvm, job_msg, queued);
+
+ if (!*queued)
+ kfree(job_msg);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
static int kvmi_msg_dispatch(struct kvmi *ikvm,
struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, bool *queued)
{
int err;
- err = kvmi_msg_dispatch_vm_cmd(ikvm, msg);
+ if (is_vcpu_message(msg->id))
+ err = kvmi_msg_dispatch_vcpu_msg(ikvm, msg, queued);
+ else
+ err = kvmi_msg_dispatch_vm_cmd(ikvm, msg);
if (err)
kvmi_err(ikvm, "%s: msg id: %u (%s), err: %d\n", __func__,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-09 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 168+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-09 15:59 [RFC PATCH v6 00/92] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 01/92] kvm: introduce KVMI (VM introspection subsystem) Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 20:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 9:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:57 ` Adalbert Lazăr
[not found] ` <5d52a5ae.1c69fb81.5c260.1573SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 12:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 15:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 21:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 9:48 ` Adalbert Lazăr
[not found] ` <5d53d8d1.1c69fb81.7d32.0bedSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-14 10:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 02/92] kvm: introspection: add basic ioctls (hook/unhook) Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 8:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:24 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 03/92] kvm: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 04/92] kvm: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 05/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 06/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 9:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 17:08 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 07/92] kvm: introspection: honor the reply option when handling the KVMI_GET_VERSION command Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 9:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 08/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 09/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_GUEST_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 10/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_VM_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 11/92] kvm: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 12/92] kvm: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 13/92] kvm: introspection: make the vCPU wait even when its jobs list is empty Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 8:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:19 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 14/92] kvm: introspection: handle introspection commands before returning to guest Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 8:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 13:54 ` Adalbert Lazăr
[not found] ` <5d52c10e.1c69fb81.26904.fd34SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 9:39 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 16/92] kvm: introspection: handle events and event replies Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 8:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 15:25 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 17/92] kvm: introspection: introduce event actions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 18/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 19/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_CREATE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 20/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VCPU_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 21/92] kvm: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 22/92] kvm: x86: provide all page tracking hooks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 23/92] kvm: page track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 24/92] kvm: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 25/92] kvm: x86: intercept the write access on sidt and other emulated instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 26/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_mmu_nested_pagefault() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 8:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 27/92] kvm: introspection: use page track Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 9:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 28/92] kvm: x86: consult the page tracking from kvm_mmu_get_page() and __direct_map() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 29/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 30/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_spt_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 31/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 32/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 33/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 34/92] Documentation: Introduce EPT based Subpage Protection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 35/92] KVM: VMX: Add control flags for SPP enabling Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 36/92] KVM: VMX: Implement functions for SPPT paging setup Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 37/92] KVM: VMX: Introduce SPP access bitmap and operation functions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 38/92] KVM: VMX: Add init/set/get functions for SPP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 39/92] KVM: VMX: Introduce SPP user-space IOCTLs Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 40/92] KVM: VMX: Handle SPP induced vmexit and page fault Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 41/92] KVM: MMU: Enable Lazy mode SPPT setup Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 42/92] KVM: MMU: Handle host memory remapping and reclaim Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 43/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_SPP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 44/92] kvm: introspection: extend the internal database of tracked pages with write_bitmap info Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 45/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_PAGE_WRITE_BITMAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 46/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_PAGE_WRITE_BITMAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 47/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_READ_PHYSICAL and KVMI_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 48/92] kvm: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 49/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_PAUSE_VCPU and KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 50/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 51/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 52/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 53/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 54/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 55/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 21:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-15 6:36 ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-19 18:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-20 8:44 ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-20 11:43 ` Mihai Donțu
2019-08-21 15:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-19 18:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 56/92] kvm: x86: block any attempt to disable MSR interception if tracked by introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 57/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 58/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 59/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 60/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 61/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 62/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 63/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 64/92] kvm: introspection: add single-stepping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 20:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 12:51 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-14 12:36 ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-14 12:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 65/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 66/92] kvm: introspection: add custom input when single-stepping a vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 67/92] kvm: introspection: use single stepping on unimplemented instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 68/92] kvm: x86: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 69/92] kvm: x86: keep the page protected if tracked by the introspection tool Adalbert Lazăr
2019-09-10 14:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-09-10 16:28 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 70/92] kvm: x86: filter out access rights only when " Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 9:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 16:06 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 71/92] mm: add support for remote mapping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:24 ` DANGER WILL ROBINSON, DANGER Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13 9:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13 12:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:01 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-15 19:19 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 20:16 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-16 17:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-23 12:39 ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-09-05 18:09 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-09-09 17:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-10 7:49 ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-02 19:27 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 13:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 14:15 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 16:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 17:04 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 20:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 15:42 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 15:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 16:42 ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-03 18:31 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 19:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-04 9:41 ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-04 11:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 16:36 ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 72/92] kvm: introspection: add memory map/unmap support on the guest side Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 73/92] kvm: introspection: use remote mapping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 74/92] kvm: x86: do not unconditionally patch the hypercall instruction during emulation Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 9:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 12:07 ` Adalbert Lazăr
[not found] ` <5d53f965.1c69fb81.cd952.035bSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-14 12:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 75/92] kvm: x86: disable gpa_available optimization in emulator_read_write_onepage() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 8:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:33 ` Adalbert Lazăr
[not found] ` <5d52ca22.1c69fb81.4ceb8.e90bSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 14:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 76/92] kvm: x86: disable EPT A/D bits if introspection is present Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 9:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 77/92] kvm: introspection: add trace functions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 78/92] kvm: x86: add tracepoints for interrupt and exception injections Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 79/92] kvm: x86: emulate movsd xmm, m64 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 9:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 80/92] kvm: x86: emulate movss xmm, m32 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 81/92] kvm: x86: emulate movq xmm, m64 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 82/92] kvm: x86: emulate movq r, xmm Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 83/92] kvm: x86: emulate movd xmm, m32 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 84/92] kvm: x86: enable the half part of movss, movsd, movups Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 85/92] kvm: x86: emulate lfence Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 86/92] kvm: x86: emulate xorpd xmm2/m128, xmm1 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 87/92] kvm: x86: emulate xorps xmm/m128, xmm Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 88/92] kvm: x86: emulate fst/fstp m64fp Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 89/92] kvm: x86: make lock cmpxchg r, r/m atomic Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 90/92] kvm: x86: emulate lock cmpxchg8b atomically Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 91/92] kvm: x86: emulate lock cmpxchg16b m128 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 92/92] kvm: x86: fallback to the single-step on multipage CMPXCHG emulation Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 18:23 ` [RFC PATCH v6 00/92] VM introspection Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 21:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 9:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190809160047.8319-16-alazar@bitdefender.com \
--to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
--cc=Zhang@kvack.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com \
--cc=mdontu@bitdefender.com \
--cc=ncitu@bitdefender.com \
--cc=patrick.colp@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=samuel.lauren@iki.fi \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).