linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Tamas K Lengyel" <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	"Mathieu Tarral" <mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com>,
	"Samuel Laurén" <samuel.lauren@iki.fi>,
	"Patrick Colp" <patrick.colp@oracle.com>,
	"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Weijiang Yang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
	Zhang@kvack.org, "Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 04/92] kvm: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function
Date: Fri,  9 Aug 2019 18:59:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809160047.8319-5-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809160047.8319-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

Based on the common header used by all messages (struct kvmi_msg_hdr),
the worker will read/validate all messages, execute the VM introspection
commands (eg. KVMI_GET_GUEST_INFO) and dispatch to vCPUs the vCPU
introspection commands (eg. KVMI_GET_REGISTERS) and the replies to
vCPU events. The vCPU threads will reply to vCPU introspection commands
without the help of the receiving worker.

Because of the command header (struct kvmi_error_code) used in any
command reply, this worker could respond to any unsupported/disallowed
command with an error code.

This thread will end when the socket is closed (signaled by userspace/QEMU
or the introspection tool) or on the first API error (eg. wrong message
size).

Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst |  86 +++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h          |  13 ++
 virt/kvm/kvmi.c                    |  43 +++++-
 virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h                |   7 +
 virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c                | 240 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 386 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
index 47b7c36d334a..1d4a1dcd7d2f 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -64,6 +64,85 @@ used on that guest. Obviously, whether the guest can really continue
 normal execution depends on whether the introspection tool has made any
 modifications that require an active KVMI channel.
 
+All messages (commands or events) have a common header::
+
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
+		__u16 id;
+		__u16 size;
+		__u32 seq;
+	};
+
+The replies have the same header, with the sequence number (``seq``)
+and message id (``id``) matching the command/event.
+
+After ``kvmi_msg_hdr``, ``id`` specific data of ``size`` bytes will
+follow.
+
+The message header and its data must be sent with one ``sendmsg()`` call
+to the socket. This simplifies the receiver loop and avoids
+the reconstruction of messages on the other side.
+
+The wire protocol uses the host native byte-order. The introspection tool
+must check this during the handshake and do the necessary conversion.
+
+A command reply begins with::
+
+	struct kvmi_error_code {
+		__s32 err;
+		__u32 padding;
+	}
+
+followed by the command specific data if the error code ``err`` is zero.
+
+The error code -KVM_EOPNOTSUPP is returned for unsupported commands.
+
+The error code -KVM_EPERM is returned for disallowed commands (see **Hooking**).
+
+The error code is related to the message processing, including unsupported
+commands. For all the other errors (incomplete messages, wrong sequence
+numbers, socket errors etc.) the socket will be closed. The device
+manager should reconnect.
+
+While all commands will have a reply as soon as possible, the replies
+to events will probably be delayed until a set of (new) commands will
+complete::
+
+   Host kernel               Tool
+   -----------               ----
+   event 1 ->
+                             <- command 1
+   command 1 reply ->
+                             <- command 2
+   command 2 reply ->
+                             <- event 1 reply
+
+If both ends send a message at the same time::
+
+   Host kernel               Tool
+   -----------               ----
+   event X ->                <- command X
+
+the host kernel will reply to 'command X', regardless of the receive time
+(before or after the 'event X' was sent).
+
+As it can be seen below, the wire protocol specifies occasional padding. This
+is to permit working with the data by directly using C structures or to round
+the structure size to a multiple of 8 bytes (64bit) to improve the copy
+operations that happen during ``recvmsg()`` or ``sendmsg()``. The members
+should have the native alignment of the host (4 bytes on x86). All padding
+must be initialized with zero otherwise the respective commands will fail
+with -KVM_EINVAL.
+
+To describe the commands/events, we reuse some conventions from api.txt:
+
+  - Architectures: which instruction set architectures provide this command/event
+
+  - Versions: which versions provide this command/event
+
+  - Parameters: incoming message data
+
+  - Returns: outgoing/reply message data
+
 Handshake
 ---------
 
@@ -99,6 +178,13 @@ commands/events) to KVM, and forget about it. It will be notified by
 KVM when the introspection tool closes the file handle (in case of
 errors), and should reinitiate the handshake.
 
+Once the file handle reaches KVM, the introspection tool should use
+the *KVMI_GET_VERSION* command to get the API version and/or
+the *KVMI_CHECK_COMMAND* and *KVMI_CHECK_EVENTS* commands to see which
+commands/events are allowed for this guest. The error code -KVM_EPERM
+will be returned if the introspection tool uses a command or enables an
+event which is disallowed.
+
 Unhooking
 ---------
 
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
index dbf63ad0862f..6c7600ed4564 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -65,4 +65,17 @@ enum {
 	KVMI_NUM_EVENTS
 };
 
+#define KVMI_MSG_SIZE (4096 - sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr))
+
+struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
+	__u16 id;
+	__u16 size;
+	__u32 seq;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_error_code {
+	__s32 err;
+	__u32 padding;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
index dc64f975998f..afa31748d7f4 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -10,13 +10,54 @@
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/bitmap.h>
 
-int kvmi_init(void)
+static struct kmem_cache *msg_cache;
+
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void)
+{
+	return kmem_cache_zalloc(msg_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+}
+
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc_check(size_t size)
+{
+	if (size > KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC)
+		return NULL;
+	return kvmi_msg_alloc();
+}
+
+void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr)
+{
+	if (addr)
+		kmem_cache_free(msg_cache, addr);
+}
+
+static void kvmi_cache_destroy(void)
 {
+	kmem_cache_destroy(msg_cache);
+	msg_cache = NULL;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_cache_create(void)
+{
+	msg_cache = kmem_cache_create("kvmi_msg", KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC,
+				      4096, SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
+
+	if (!msg_cache) {
+		kvmi_cache_destroy();
+
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int kvmi_init(void)
+{
+	return kvmi_cache_create();
+}
+
 void kvmi_uninit(void)
 {
+	kvmi_cache_destroy();
 }
 
 static bool alloc_kvmi(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_introspection *qemu)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
index bd8b539e917a..76119a4b69d8 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
 #define kvmi_err(ikvm, fmt, ...) \
 	kvm_info("%pU ERROR: " fmt, &ikvm->uuid, ## __VA_ARGS__)
 
+#define KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC (sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr) + KVMI_MSG_SIZE)
+
 #define KVMI_KNOWN_VCPU_EVENTS ( \
 		BIT(KVMI_EVENT_CR) | \
 		BIT(KVMI_EVENT_MSR) | \
@@ -91,4 +93,9 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvmi *ikvm);
 void kvmi_sock_put(struct kvmi *ikvm);
 bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvmi *ikvm);
 
+/* kvmi.c */
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void);
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc_check(size_t size);
+void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
index 4de012eafb6d..af6bc47dc031 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -8,6 +8,19 @@
 #include <linux/net.h>
 #include "kvmi_int.h"
 
+static const char *const msg_IDs[] = {
+};
+
+static bool is_known_message(u16 id)
+{
+	return id < ARRAY_SIZE(msg_IDs) && msg_IDs[id];
+}
+
+static const char *id2str(u16 id)
+{
+	return is_known_message(id) ? msg_IDs[id] : "unknown";
+}
+
 bool kvmi_sock_get(struct kvmi *ikvm, int fd)
 {
 	struct socket *sock;
@@ -35,8 +48,231 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvmi *ikvm)
 	kernel_sock_shutdown(ikvm->sock, SHUT_RDWR);
 }
 
+static int kvmi_sock_read(struct kvmi *ikvm, void *buf, size_t size)
+{
+	struct kvec i = {
+		.iov_base = buf,
+		.iov_len = size,
+	};
+	struct msghdr m = { };
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = kernel_recvmsg(ikvm->sock, &m, &i, 1, size, MSG_WAITALL);
+
+	if (rc > 0)
+		print_hex_dump_debug("read: ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, 32, 1,
+					buf, rc, false);
+
+	if (unlikely(rc != size)) {
+		if (rc >= 0)
+			rc = -EPIPE;
+		else
+			kvmi_err(ikvm, "kernel_recvmsg: %d\n", rc);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_sock_write(struct kvmi *ikvm, struct kvec *i, size_t n,
+			   size_t size)
+{
+	struct msghdr m = { };
+	int rc, k;
+
+	rc = kernel_sendmsg(ikvm->sock, &m, i, n, size);
+
+	if (rc > 0)
+		for (k = 0; k < n; k++)
+			print_hex_dump_debug("write: ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, 32, 1,
+					i[k].iov_base, i[k].iov_len, false);
+
+	if (unlikely(rc != size)) {
+		kvmi_err(ikvm, "kernel_sendmsg: %d\n", rc);
+		if (rc >= 0)
+			rc = -EPIPE;
+		return rc;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_reply(struct kvmi *ikvm,
+			  const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int err,
+			  const void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	struct kvmi_error_code ec;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr h;
+	struct kvec vec[3] = {
+		{ .iov_base = &h, .iov_len = sizeof(h) },
+		{ .iov_base = &ec, .iov_len = sizeof(ec) },
+		{ .iov_base = (void *)rpl, .iov_len = rpl_size },
+	};
+	size_t size = sizeof(h) + sizeof(ec) + (err ? 0 : rpl_size);
+	size_t n = err ? ARRAY_SIZE(vec) - 1 : ARRAY_SIZE(vec);
+
+	memset(&h, 0, sizeof(h));
+	h.id = msg->id;
+	h.seq = msg->seq;
+	h.size = size - sizeof(h);
+
+	memset(&ec, 0, sizeof(ec));
+	ec.err = err;
+
+	return kvmi_sock_write(ikvm, vec, n, size);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_vm_reply(struct kvmi *ikvm,
+			     const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int err,
+			     const void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	return kvmi_msg_reply(ikvm, msg, err, rpl, rpl_size);
+}
+
+static bool is_command_allowed(struct kvmi *ikvm, int id)
+{
+	return test_bit(id, ikvm->cmd_allow_mask);
+}
+
+/*
+ * These commands are executed on the receiving thread/worker.
+ */
+static int(*const msg_vm[])(struct kvmi *, const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *,
+			    const void *) = {
+};
+
+static bool is_vm_message(u16 id)
+{
+	return id < ARRAY_SIZE(msg_vm) && !!msg_vm[id];
+}
+
+static bool is_unsupported_message(u16 id)
+{
+	bool supported;
+
+	supported = is_known_message(id) && is_vm_message(id);
+
+	return !supported;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_consume_bytes(struct kvmi *ikvm, size_t bytes)
+{
+	size_t to_read;
+	u8 buf[1024];
+	int err = 0;
+
+	while (bytes && !err) {
+		to_read = min(bytes, sizeof(buf));
+
+		err = kvmi_sock_read(ikvm, buf, to_read);
+
+		bytes -= to_read;
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static struct kvmi_msg_hdr *kvmi_msg_recv(struct kvmi *ikvm, bool *unsupported)
+{
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg;
+	int err;
+
+	*unsupported = false;
+
+	msg = kvmi_msg_alloc();
+	if (!msg)
+		goto out_err;
+
+	err = kvmi_sock_read(ikvm, msg, sizeof(*msg));
+	if (err)
+		goto out_err;
+
+	if (msg->size > KVMI_MSG_SIZE)
+		goto out_err_msg;
+
+	if (is_unsupported_message(msg->id)) {
+		if (msg->size && kvmi_consume_bytes(ikvm, msg->size) < 0)
+			goto out_err_msg;
+
+		*unsupported = true;
+		return msg;
+	}
+
+	if (msg->size && kvmi_sock_read(ikvm, msg + 1, msg->size) < 0)
+		goto out_err_msg;
+
+	return msg;
+
+out_err_msg:
+	kvmi_err(ikvm, "%s id %u (%s) size %u\n",
+		 __func__, msg->id, id2str(msg->id), msg->size);
+
+out_err:
+	kvmi_msg_free(msg);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_dispatch_vm_cmd(struct kvmi *ikvm,
+				    const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg)
+{
+	return msg_vm[msg->id](ikvm, msg, msg + 1);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_dispatch(struct kvmi *ikvm,
+			     struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, bool *queued)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = kvmi_msg_dispatch_vm_cmd(ikvm, msg);
+
+	if (err)
+		kvmi_err(ikvm, "%s: msg id: %u (%s), err: %d\n", __func__,
+			 msg->id, id2str(msg->id), err);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static bool is_message_allowed(struct kvmi *ikvm, __u16 id)
+{
+	if (id == KVMI_EVENT_REPLY)
+		return true;
+
+	/*
+	 * Some commands (eg.pause) request events that might be
+	 * disallowed. The command is allowed here, but the function
+	 * handling the command will return -KVM_EPERM if the event
+	 * is disallowed.
+	 */
+	return is_command_allowed(ikvm, id);
+}
+
 bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvmi *ikvm)
 {
-	kvmi_info(ikvm, "TODO: %s", __func__);
-	return false;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg;
+	bool queued = false;
+	bool unsupported;
+	int err = -1;
+
+	msg = kvmi_msg_recv(ikvm, &unsupported);
+	if (!msg)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (unsupported) {
+		err = kvmi_msg_vm_reply(ikvm, msg, -KVM_EOPNOTSUPP, NULL, 0);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (!is_message_allowed(ikvm, msg->id)) {
+		err = kvmi_msg_vm_reply(ikvm, msg, -KVM_EPERM, NULL, 0);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = kvmi_msg_dispatch(ikvm, msg, &queued);
+
+out:
+	if (!queued)
+		kvmi_msg_free(msg);
+
+	return err == 0;
 }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-09 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 168+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-09 15:59 [RFC PATCH v6 00/92] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 01/92] kvm: introduce KVMI (VM introspection subsystem) Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 20:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13  9:11     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:57     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d52a5ae.1c69fb81.5c260.1573SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 12:09       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 15:01         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 21:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14  9:48           ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]           ` <5d53d8d1.1c69fb81.7d32.0bedSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-14 10:37             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 02/92] kvm: introspection: add basic ioctls (hook/unhook) Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:44   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:24     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 03/92] kvm: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 05/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 06/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:15   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 17:08     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 07/92] kvm: introspection: honor the reply option when handling the KVMI_GET_VERSION command Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:16   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 08/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 09/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_GUEST_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 10/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_VM_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 11/92] kvm: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 12/92] kvm: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 13/92] kvm: introspection: make the vCPU wait even when its jobs list is empty Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:43   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:19     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 14/92] kvm: introspection: handle introspection commands before returning to guest Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:26   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 13:54     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d52c10e.1c69fb81.26904.fd34SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 14:45       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14  9:39         ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 15/92] kvm: introspection: handle vCPU related introspection commands Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 16/92] kvm: introspection: handle events and event replies Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 15:25     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 17/92] kvm: introspection: introduce event actions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 18/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 19/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_CREATE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 20/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VCPU_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 21/92] kvm: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 22/92] kvm: x86: provide all page tracking hooks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 23/92] kvm: page track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 24/92] kvm: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 25/92] kvm: x86: intercept the write access on sidt and other emulated instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 26/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_mmu_nested_pagefault() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 27/92] kvm: introspection: use page track Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 28/92] kvm: x86: consult the page tracking from kvm_mmu_get_page() and __direct_map() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 29/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 30/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_spt_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 31/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 32/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 33/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 34/92] Documentation: Introduce EPT based Subpage Protection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 35/92] KVM: VMX: Add control flags for SPP enabling Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 36/92] KVM: VMX: Implement functions for SPPT paging setup Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 37/92] KVM: VMX: Introduce SPP access bitmap and operation functions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 38/92] KVM: VMX: Add init/set/get functions for SPP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 39/92] KVM: VMX: Introduce SPP user-space IOCTLs Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 40/92] KVM: VMX: Handle SPP induced vmexit and page fault Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 41/92] KVM: MMU: Enable Lazy mode SPPT setup Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 42/92] KVM: MMU: Handle host memory remapping and reclaim Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 43/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_SPP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 44/92] kvm: introspection: extend the internal database of tracked pages with write_bitmap info Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 45/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_PAGE_WRITE_BITMAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 46/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_PAGE_WRITE_BITMAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 47/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_READ_PHYSICAL and KVMI_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 48/92] kvm: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 49/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_PAUSE_VCPU and KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 50/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 51/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 52/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 53/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 54/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 55/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 21:05   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-15  6:36     ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-19 18:36       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-20  8:44         ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-20 11:43           ` Mihai Donțu
2019-08-21 15:18             ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-19 18:52   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 56/92] kvm: x86: block any attempt to disable MSR interception if tracked by introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 57/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 58/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 59/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 60/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 61/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 62/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 63/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 64/92] kvm: introspection: add single-stepping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 20:50   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 12:51     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-14 12:36     ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-14 12:53       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 65/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 66/92] kvm: introspection: add custom input when single-stepping a vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 67/92] kvm: introspection: use single stepping on unimplemented instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 68/92] kvm: x86: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 69/92] kvm: x86: keep the page protected if tracked by the introspection tool Adalbert Lazăr
2019-09-10 14:26   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-09-10 16:28     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 70/92] kvm: x86: filter out access rights only when " Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:08   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 16:06     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 71/92] mm: add support for remote mapping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:24   ` DANGER WILL ROBINSON, DANGER Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13  9:29     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:24       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13 12:02         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:01     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-15 19:19       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 20:16         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-16 17:45           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-23 12:39           ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-09-05 18:09             ` Jerome Glisse
2019-09-09 17:00               ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-10  7:49                 ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-02 19:27                   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 13:46                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 14:15                       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 16:18                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 17:04                           ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 20:10                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 15:42                               ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 15:50                                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 16:42                                   ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-03 18:31                                     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 19:38                                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-04  9:41                                         ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-04 11:46                                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 16:36                               ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 72/92] kvm: introspection: add memory map/unmap support on the guest side Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 73/92] kvm: introspection: use remote mapping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 74/92] kvm: x86: do not unconditionally patch the hypercall instruction during emulation Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:20   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 12:07     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d53f965.1c69fb81.cd952.035bSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-14 12:33       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 75/92] kvm: x86: disable gpa_available optimization in emulator_read_write_onepage() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:33     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d52ca22.1c69fb81.4ceb8.e90bSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 14:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 76/92] kvm: x86: disable EPT A/D bits if introspection is present Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:18   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 77/92] kvm: introspection: add trace functions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 78/92] kvm: x86: add tracepoints for interrupt and exception injections Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 79/92] kvm: x86: emulate movsd xmm, m64 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 80/92] kvm: x86: emulate movss xmm, m32 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 81/92] kvm: x86: emulate movq xmm, m64 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 82/92] kvm: x86: emulate movq r, xmm Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 83/92] kvm: x86: emulate movd xmm, m32 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 84/92] kvm: x86: enable the half part of movss, movsd, movups Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 85/92] kvm: x86: emulate lfence Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 86/92] kvm: x86: emulate xorpd xmm2/m128, xmm1 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 87/92] kvm: x86: emulate xorps xmm/m128, xmm Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 88/92] kvm: x86: emulate fst/fstp m64fp Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 89/92] kvm: x86: make lock cmpxchg r, r/m atomic Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 90/92] kvm: x86: emulate lock cmpxchg8b atomically Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 91/92] kvm: x86: emulate lock cmpxchg16b m128 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 92/92] kvm: x86: fallback to the single-step on multipage CMPXCHG emulation Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 18:23 ` [RFC PATCH v6 00/92] VM introspection Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 21:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13  9:34 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190809160047.8319-5-alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=Zhang@kvack.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com \
    --cc=mdontu@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=patrick.colp@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=samuel.lauren@iki.fi \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=yu.c.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).