linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/10] mmap locking API: add mmap_read_trylock_non_owner()
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:22:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420182211.exrzkszefraeylv2@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200415004353.130248-8-walken@google.com>

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:43:50PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> index 11d41f0c7005..998968659892 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> @@ -317,7 +316,7 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
>  	 * with build_id.
>  	 */
>  	if (!user || !current || !current->mm || irq_work_busy ||
> -	    mmap_read_trylock(current->mm) == 0) {
> +	    !mmap_read_trylock_non_owner(current->mm)) {
>  		/* cannot access current->mm, fall back to ips */
>  		for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
>  			id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP;
> @@ -342,16 +341,10 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!work) {
> -		mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
> +		mmap_read_unlock_non_owner(current->mm);

These 'non_owner' calls are not intuitive because current _is the owner, so the
v3 version seems better, even if it adds a special wrapper for rwsem_release.

Though it makes some sense if you think, "we're consistently using the
non_owner APIs because there's a legitimate use somewhere else," so I'm fine
either way.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-15  0:43 [PATCH v4 00/10] Add a new mmap locking API wrapping mmap_sem calls Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-15  0:43 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-20 19:48   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2020-04-21  0:48     ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-15  0:43 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] MMU notifier: use the new mmap locking API Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-20 19:51   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2020-04-15  0:43 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] DMA reservations: " Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-15  0:43 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-15  0:43 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem call sites missed by coccinelle Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-15  0:43 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] mmap locking API: convert nested write lock sites Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-20 18:19   ` Daniel Jordan
2020-04-20 19:33   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-21  0:51     ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-15  0:43 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] mmap locking API: add mmap_read_trylock_non_owner() Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-20 18:22   ` Daniel Jordan [this message]
2020-04-20 19:23     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-21  0:55       ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-15  0:43 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] mmap locking API: add MMAP_LOCK_INITIALIZER Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-20 18:23   ` Daniel Jordan
2020-04-20 19:28   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-21  0:57     ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-15  0:43 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] mmap locking API: use lockdep_assert_held Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-21  2:35   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-15  0:43 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] mmap locking API: rename mmap_sem to mmap_lock Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-20 18:28   ` Daniel Jordan
2020-04-21  5:33   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-21 22:19     ` Michel Lespinasse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200420182211.exrzkszefraeylv2@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com \
    --to=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).