* [PATCH] selftests/mm: run_vmtests.sh: add missing tests @ 2024-01-16 9:06 Muhammad Usama Anjum 2024-01-19 16:09 ` Ryan Roberts 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-01-16 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton, Shuah Khan Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum, kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel Add missing tests to run_vmtests.sh. The mm kselftests are run through run_vmtests.sh. If a test isn't present in this script, it'll not run with run_tests or `make -C tools/testing/selftests/mm run_tests`. Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh index 246d53a5d7f2..a5e6ba8d3579 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh @@ -248,6 +248,9 @@ CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./map_hugetlb CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugepage-mremap CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugepage-vmemmap CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb-madvise +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb-read-hwpoison nr_hugepages_tmp=$(cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages) # For this test, we need one and just one huge page -- 2.42.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: run_vmtests.sh: add missing tests 2024-01-16 9:06 [PATCH] selftests/mm: run_vmtests.sh: add missing tests Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-01-19 16:09 ` Ryan Roberts 2024-01-22 8:46 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Ryan Roberts @ 2024-01-19 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Muhammad Usama Anjum, Andrew Morton, Shuah Khan Cc: kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel Hi Muhammad, Afraid this patch is causing a regression on our CI system when it turned up in linux-next today. Additionally, 2 of thetests you have added are failing because the scripts are not exported correctly... On 16/01/2024 09:06, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > Add missing tests to run_vmtests.sh. The mm kselftests are run through > run_vmtests.sh. If a test isn't present in this script, it'll not run > with run_tests or `make -C tools/testing/selftests/mm run_tests`. > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh > index 246d53a5d7f2..a5e6ba8d3579 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh > @@ -248,6 +248,9 @@ CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./map_hugetlb > CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugepage-mremap > CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugepage-vmemmap > CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb-madvise > +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh > +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh These 2 tests are failing because the test scripts are not exported. You will need to add them to the TEST_FILES variable in the Makefile. > +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb-read-hwpoison The addition of this test causes 2 later tests to fail with ENOMEM. I suspect its a side-effect of marking the hugetlbs as hwpoisoned? (just a guess based on the test name!). Once a page is marked poisoned, is there a way to un-poison it? If not, I suspect that's why it wasn't part of the standard test script in the first place. These are the tests that start failing: # # ------------------------------------ # # running ./uffd-stress hugetlb 128 32 # # ------------------------------------ # # nr_pages: 64, nr_pages_per_cpu: 8 # # ERROR: context init failed (errno=12, @uffd-stress.c:254) # # [FAIL] # not ok 18 uffd-stress hugetlb 128 32 # exit=1 # # -------------------------------------------- # # running ./uffd-stress hugetlb-private 128 32 # # -------------------------------------------- # # nr_pages: 64, nr_pages_per_cpu: 8 # # bounces: 31, mode: rnd racing ver poll, ERROR: UFFDIO_COPY error: -12ERROR: UFFDIO_COPY error: -12 (errno=12, @uffd-common.c:614) # # (errno=12, @uffd-common.c:614) # # [FAIL] Quickest way to repo is: $ sudo ./run_vmtests.sh -t "userfaultfd hugetlb" Thanks, Ryan > > nr_hugepages_tmp=$(cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages) > # For this test, we need one and just one huge page ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: run_vmtests.sh: add missing tests 2024-01-19 16:09 ` Ryan Roberts @ 2024-01-22 8:46 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum 2024-01-22 9:59 ` Ryan Roberts 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-01-22 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ryan Roberts, Andrew Morton, Shuah Khan Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum, kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel On 1/19/24 9:09 PM, Ryan Roberts wrote: > Hi Muhammad, > > Afraid this patch is causing a regression on our CI system when it turned up in > linux-next today. Additionally, 2 of thetests you have added are failing because > the scripts are not exported correctly... Andrew has dropped this patch for now. > > On 16/01/2024 09:06, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >> Add missing tests to run_vmtests.sh. The mm kselftests are run through >> run_vmtests.sh. If a test isn't present in this script, it'll not run >> with run_tests or `make -C tools/testing/selftests/mm run_tests`. >> >> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> >> --- >> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh >> index 246d53a5d7f2..a5e6ba8d3579 100755 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh >> @@ -248,6 +248,9 @@ CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./map_hugetlb >> CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugepage-mremap >> CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugepage-vmemmap >> CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb-madvise >> +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh >> +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh > > These 2 tests are failing because the test scripts are not exported. You will > need to add them to the TEST_FILES variable in the Makefile. This must be done. I'll investigate even after adding them if these scripts are robust enough to pass. > >> +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb-read-hwpoison > > The addition of this test causes 2 later tests to fail with ENOMEM. I suspect > its a side-effect of marking the hugetlbs as hwpoisoned? (just a guess based on > the test name!). Once a page is marked poisoned, is there a way to un-poison it? > If not, I suspect that's why it wasn't part of the standard test script in the > first place. hugetlb-read-hwpoison failed as probably the fix in the kernel for the test hasn't been merged in the kernel. The other tests (uffd-stress) aren't failing on my end and on CI [1][2] [1] https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/12577207#L3677 [2] https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/12577229#L4027 Maybe its configurations issue which is exposed now. Not sure. Maybe hugetlb-read-hwpoison is changing some configuration and not restoring it. Maybe your system has less number of hugetlb pages. > > These are the tests that start failing: > > # # ------------------------------------ > # # running ./uffd-stress hugetlb 128 32 > # # ------------------------------------ > # # nr_pages: 64, nr_pages_per_cpu: 8 > # # ERROR: context init failed (errno=12, @uffd-stress.c:254) > # # [FAIL] > # not ok 18 uffd-stress hugetlb 128 32 # exit=1 > # # -------------------------------------------- > # # running ./uffd-stress hugetlb-private 128 32 > # # -------------------------------------------- > # # nr_pages: 64, nr_pages_per_cpu: 8 > # # bounces: 31, mode: rnd racing ver poll, ERROR: UFFDIO_COPY error: -12ERROR: > UFFDIO_COPY error: -12 (errno=12, @uffd-common.c:614) > # # (errno=12, @uffd-common.c:614) > # # [FAIL] > > Quickest way to repo is: > > $ sudo ./run_vmtests.sh -t "userfaultfd hugetlb" > > Thanks, > Ryan > > >> >> nr_hugepages_tmp=$(cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages) >> # For this test, we need one and just one huge page > > -- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: run_vmtests.sh: add missing tests 2024-01-22 8:46 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-01-22 9:59 ` Ryan Roberts 2024-01-23 7:51 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Ryan Roberts @ 2024-01-22 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Muhammad Usama Anjum, Andrew Morton, Shuah Khan Cc: kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel On 22/01/2024 08:46, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > On 1/19/24 9:09 PM, Ryan Roberts wrote: >> Hi Muhammad, >> >> Afraid this patch is causing a regression on our CI system when it turned up in >> linux-next today. Additionally, 2 of thetests you have added are failing because >> the scripts are not exported correctly... > Andrew has dropped this patch for now. > >> >> On 16/01/2024 09:06, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >>> Add missing tests to run_vmtests.sh. The mm kselftests are run through >>> run_vmtests.sh. If a test isn't present in this script, it'll not run >>> with run_tests or `make -C tools/testing/selftests/mm run_tests`. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com> >>> --- >>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 3 +++ >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh >>> index 246d53a5d7f2..a5e6ba8d3579 100755 >>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh >>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh >>> @@ -248,6 +248,9 @@ CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./map_hugetlb >>> CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugepage-mremap >>> CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugepage-vmemmap >>> CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb-madvise >>> +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh >>> +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh >> >> These 2 tests are failing because the test scripts are not exported. You will >> need to add them to the TEST_FILES variable in the Makefile. > This must be done. I'll investigate even after adding them if these scripts > are robust enough to pass. Great thanks! > >> >>> +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb-read-hwpoison >> >> The addition of this test causes 2 later tests to fail with ENOMEM. I suspect >> its a side-effect of marking the hugetlbs as hwpoisoned? (just a guess based on >> the test name!). Once a page is marked poisoned, is there a way to un-poison it? >> If not, I suspect that's why it wasn't part of the standard test script in the >> first place. > hugetlb-read-hwpoison failed as probably the fix in the kernel for the test > hasn't been merged in the kernel. The other tests (uffd-stress) aren't > failing on my end and on CI [1][2] To be clear, hugetlb-read-hwpoison isn't failing for me, its just causing the subsequent tests uffd-stress tests to fail. Both of those subsequent tests are allocating hugetlbs so my guess is that since this test is marking some hugetlbs as poisoned, there are no longer enough for the subsequent tests. > > [1] https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/12577207#L3677 > [2] https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/12577229#L4027 > > Maybe its configurations issue which is exposed now. Not sure. Maybe > hugetlb-read-hwpoison is changing some configuration and not restoring it. Well yes - its marking some hugetlb pages as HWPOISONED. > Maybe your system has less number of hugetlb pages. YEs probably; What is hugetlb-read-hwpoison's requirement for size and number of hugetlb pages? the run_vmtests.sh script allocates the required number of default-sized hugetlb pages before running any tests (I guess this value should be increased for hugetlb-read-hwpoison's requirements?). Additionally, our CI preallocates non-default sizes from the kernel command line at boot. Happy to increase these if you can tell me what the new requirement is: hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:2,1:2 hugepagesz=32M hugepages=0:2,1:2 default_hugepagesz=2M hugepages=0:64,1:64 hugepagesz=64K hugepages=0:2,1:2 Thanks, Ryan > >> >> These are the tests that start failing: >> >> # # ------------------------------------ >> # # running ./uffd-stress hugetlb 128 32 >> # # ------------------------------------ >> # # nr_pages: 64, nr_pages_per_cpu: 8 >> # # ERROR: context init failed (errno=12, @uffd-stress.c:254) >> # # [FAIL] >> # not ok 18 uffd-stress hugetlb 128 32 # exit=1 >> # # -------------------------------------------- >> # # running ./uffd-stress hugetlb-private 128 32 >> # # -------------------------------------------- >> # # nr_pages: 64, nr_pages_per_cpu: 8 >> # # bounces: 31, mode: rnd racing ver poll, ERROR: UFFDIO_COPY error: -12ERROR: >> UFFDIO_COPY error: -12 (errno=12, @uffd-common.c:614) >> # # (errno=12, @uffd-common.c:614) >> # # [FAIL] >> >> Quickest way to repo is: >> >> $ sudo ./run_vmtests.sh -t "userfaultfd hugetlb" >> >> Thanks, >> Ryan >> >> >>> >>> nr_hugepages_tmp=$(cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages) >>> # For this test, we need one and just one huge page >> >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: run_vmtests.sh: add missing tests 2024-01-22 9:59 ` Ryan Roberts @ 2024-01-23 7:51 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum 2024-01-23 9:23 ` Ryan Roberts 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-01-23 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ryan Roberts Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum, kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Shuah Khan On 1/22/24 2:59 PM, Ryan Roberts wrote: >>>> +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb-read-hwpoison >>> >>> The addition of this test causes 2 later tests to fail with ENOMEM. I suspect >>> its a side-effect of marking the hugetlbs as hwpoisoned? (just a guess based on >>> the test name!). Once a page is marked poisoned, is there a way to un-poison it? >>> If not, I suspect that's why it wasn't part of the standard test script in the >>> first place. >> hugetlb-read-hwpoison failed as probably the fix in the kernel for the test >> hasn't been merged in the kernel. The other tests (uffd-stress) aren't >> failing on my end and on CI [1][2] > > To be clear, hugetlb-read-hwpoison isn't failing for me, its just causing the > subsequent tests uffd-stress tests to fail. Both of those subsequent tests are > allocating hugetlbs so my guess is that since this test is marking some hugetlbs > as poisoned, there are no longer enough for the subsequent tests. > >> >> [1] https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/12577207#L3677 >> [2] https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/12577229#L4027 >> >> Maybe its configurations issue which is exposed now. Not sure. Maybe >> hugetlb-read-hwpoison is changing some configuration and not restoring it. > > Well yes - its marking some hugetlb pages as HWPOISONED. > >> Maybe your system has less number of hugetlb pages. > > YEs probably; What is hugetlb-read-hwpoison's requirement for size and number of > hugetlb pages? the run_vmtests.sh script allocates the required number of > default-sized hugetlb pages before running any tests (I guess this value should > be increased for hugetlb-read-hwpoison's requirements?). > > Additionally, our CI preallocates non-default sizes from the kernel command line > at boot. Happy to increase these if you can tell me what the new requirement is: I'm not sure about the exact requirement of the number of hugetlb for these tests. But I specify hugepages=1000 and tests work for me. I've sent v2 [1]. Would it be possible to run your CI on that and share results before we merge that one? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240123073615.920324-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com > > hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:2,1:2 hugepagesz=32M hugepages=0:2,1:2 > default_hugepagesz=2M hugepages=0:64,1:64 hugepagesz=64K hugepages=0:2,1:2 > > Thanks, > Ryan > -- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: run_vmtests.sh: add missing tests 2024-01-23 7:51 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-01-23 9:23 ` Ryan Roberts 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Ryan Roberts @ 2024-01-23 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Muhammad Usama Anjum Cc: kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Shuah Khan On 23/01/2024 07:51, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > On 1/22/24 2:59 PM, Ryan Roberts wrote: >>>>> +CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugetlb-read-hwpoison >>>> >>>> The addition of this test causes 2 later tests to fail with ENOMEM. I suspect >>>> its a side-effect of marking the hugetlbs as hwpoisoned? (just a guess based on >>>> the test name!). Once a page is marked poisoned, is there a way to un-poison it? >>>> If not, I suspect that's why it wasn't part of the standard test script in the >>>> first place. >>> hugetlb-read-hwpoison failed as probably the fix in the kernel for the test >>> hasn't been merged in the kernel. The other tests (uffd-stress) aren't >>> failing on my end and on CI [1][2] >> >> To be clear, hugetlb-read-hwpoison isn't failing for me, its just causing the >> subsequent tests uffd-stress tests to fail. Both of those subsequent tests are >> allocating hugetlbs so my guess is that since this test is marking some hugetlbs >> as poisoned, there are no longer enough for the subsequent tests. >> >>> >>> [1] https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/12577207#L3677 >>> [2] https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/12577229#L4027 >>> >>> Maybe its configurations issue which is exposed now. Not sure. Maybe >>> hugetlb-read-hwpoison is changing some configuration and not restoring it. >> >> Well yes - its marking some hugetlb pages as HWPOISONED. >> >>> Maybe your system has less number of hugetlb pages. >> >> YEs probably; What is hugetlb-read-hwpoison's requirement for size and number of >> hugetlb pages? the run_vmtests.sh script allocates the required number of >> default-sized hugetlb pages before running any tests (I guess this value should >> be increased for hugetlb-read-hwpoison's requirements?). >> >> Additionally, our CI preallocates non-default sizes from the kernel command line >> at boot. Happy to increase these if you can tell me what the new requirement is: > I'm not sure about the exact requirement of the number of hugetlb for these > tests. But I specify hugepages=1000 and tests work for me. 1000 hugepages @2M is ~2G, which is quite a big ask for small arm systems. And for big arm systems that use 64K base pages, the default hugepage size is 512M, so 1000 of those is 512G which is also quite a big ask. So I'd prefer not to make 1000 hugepages the requirement. Looking at the test, I think its using 8 default sized hugepages; But supporting it properly is still complex as the HWPOISON operation is destructive. I'll reply with more detail against the v2 patch. > > I've sent v2 [1]. Would it be possible to run your CI on that and share > results before we merge that one? > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240123073615.920324-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com > >> >> hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:2,1:2 hugepagesz=32M hugepages=0:2,1:2 >> default_hugepagesz=2M hugepages=0:64,1:64 hugepagesz=64K hugepages=0:2,1:2 >> >> Thanks, >> Ryan >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-23 9:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-01-16 9:06 [PATCH] selftests/mm: run_vmtests.sh: add missing tests Muhammad Usama Anjum 2024-01-19 16:09 ` Ryan Roberts 2024-01-22 8:46 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum 2024-01-22 9:59 ` Ryan Roberts 2024-01-23 7:51 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum 2024-01-23 9:23 ` Ryan Roberts
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).