linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: "dalias@libc.org" <dalias@libc.org>,
	 "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "suzuki.poulose@arm.com" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com" <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
	 "musl@lists.openwall.com" <musl@lists.openwall.com>,
	 "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	 "oliver.upton@linux.dev" <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	"palmer@dabbelt.com" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	 "debug@rivosinc.com" <debug@rivosinc.com>,
	"aou@eecs.berkeley.edu" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	 "shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>,
	 "oleg@redhat.com" <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"fweimer@redhat.com" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	 "keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	 "ebiederm@xmission.com" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	 "brauner@kernel.org" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "paul.walmsley@sifive.com" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	 "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 "thiago.bauermann@linaro.org" <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>,
	 "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"sorear@fastmail.com" <sorear@fastmail.com>,
	 "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH v8 00/38] arm64/gcs: Provide support for GCS in userspace
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:18:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOoUO-D7Uoj9s3eq+w9pJBZ=iucEDpU4hqtJYtPmW5T4dQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3a432c0fa9f5fe837e9d2fc7b36304709a34428.camel@intel.com>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:22 AM Edgecombe, Rick P
<rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 14:06 -0500, dalias@libc.org wrote:
> > Due to arbitrarily nestable signal frames, no, this does not suffice.
> > An interrupted operation using the lock could be arbitrarily delayed,
> > even never execute again, making any call to dlopen deadlock.
>
> Doh! Yep, it is not robust to this. The only thing that could be done
> would be a timeout in dlopen(). Which would make the whole thing just
> better than nothing.
>
> >
> > >
> >
> > It's fine to turn RDSSP into an actual emulated read of the SSP, or
> > at
> > least an emulated load of zero so that uninitialized data is not left
> > in the target register.
>
> We can't intercept RDSSP, but it becomes a NOP by default. (disclaimer
> x86-only knowledge).
>
> >  If doing the latter, code working with the
> > shadow stack just needs to be prepared for the possibility that it
> > could be async-disabled, and check the return value.
> >
> > I have not looked at all the instructions that become #UD but I
> > suspect they all have reasonable trivial ways to implement a
> > "disabled" version of them that userspace can act upon reasonably.
>
> This would have to be thought through functionally and performance
> wise. I'm not opposed if can come up with a fully fleshed out plan. How
> serious are you in pursuing musl support, if we had something like
> this?
>
> HJ, any thoughts on whether glibc would use this as well?

Assuming that we are talking about permissive mode,  if kernel can
suppress UD, we don't need to disable SHSTK.   Glibc can enable
ARCH_SHSTK_SUPPRESS_UD instead.

> It is probably worth mentioning that from the security side (as Mark
> mentioned there is always tension in the tradeoffs on these features),
> permissive mode is seen by some as something that weakens security too
> much. Apps could call dlopen() on a known unsupported DSO before doing
> ROP. I don't know if you have any musl users with specific shadow stack
> use cases to ask about this.



-- 
H.J.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-03 12:25 [PATCH v8 00/38] arm64/gcs: Provide support for GCS in userspace Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 01/38] arm64/mm: Restructure arch_validate_flags() for extensibility Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 02/38] prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 03/38] mman: Add map_shadow_stack() flags Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 04/38] arm64: Document boot requirements for Guarded Control Stacks Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 05/38] arm64/gcs: Document the ABI " Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 06/38] arm64/sysreg: Add definitions for architected GCS caps Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 07/38] arm64/gcs: Add manual encodings of GCS instructions Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 08/38] arm64/gcs: Provide put_user_gcs() Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 09/38] arm64/cpufeature: Runtime detection of Guarded Control Stack (GCS) Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 10/38] arm64/mm: Allocate PIE slots for EL0 guarded control stack Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 11/38] mm: Define VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 when we support GCS Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 12/38] arm64/mm: Map pages for guarded control stack Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 13/38] KVM: arm64: Manage GCS registers for guests Mark Brown
2024-02-05  9:46   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-05 12:35     ` Mark Brown
2024-02-05 15:34       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-05 16:58         ` Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 14/38] arm64/gcs: Allow GCS usage at EL0 and EL1 Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 15/38] arm64/idreg: Add overrride for GCS Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 16/38] arm64/hwcap: Add hwcap " Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 17/38] arm64/traps: Handle GCS exceptions Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 18/38] arm64/mm: Handle GCS data aborts Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 19/38] arm64/gcs: Context switch GCS state for EL0 Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 20/38] arm64/gcs: Ensure that new threads have a GCS Mark Brown
2024-02-20  2:02   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-02-21 18:16     ` Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 21/38] arm64/gcs: Implement shadow stack prctl() interface Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 22/38] arm64/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 23/38] arm64/signal: Set up and restore the GCS context for signal handlers Mark Brown
2024-02-20  2:03   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 24/38] arm64/signal: Expose GCS state in signal frames Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 25/38] arm64/ptrace: Expose GCS via ptrace and core files Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 26/38] arm64: Add Kconfig for Guarded Control Stack (GCS) Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 27/38] kselftest/arm64: Verify the GCS hwcap Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 28/38] kselftest/arm64: Add GCS as a detected feature in the signal tests Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 29/38] kselftest/arm64: Add framework support for GCS to signal handling tests Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 30/38] kselftest/arm64: Allow signals tests to specify an expected si_code Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 31/38] kselftest/arm64: Always run signals tests with GCS enabled Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 32/38] kselftest/arm64: Add very basic GCS test program Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:25 ` [PATCH v8 33/38] kselftest/arm64: Add a GCS test program built with the system libc Mark Brown
2024-02-20  2:15   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-02-21 19:20     ` Mark Brown
2024-02-22 19:11     ` Mark Brown
2024-02-23  2:24       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-02-27 16:14         ` Mark Brown
2024-02-27 19:08           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-02-29 21:45         ` Mark Brown
2024-02-29 22:13           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-02-03 12:26 ` [PATCH v8 34/38] kselftest/arm64: Add test coverage for GCS mode locking Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:26 ` [PATCH v8 35/38] selftests/arm64: Add GCS signal tests Mark Brown
2024-02-20  2:17   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-02-03 12:26 ` [PATCH v8 36/38] kselftest/arm64: Add a GCS stress test Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:26 ` [PATCH v8 37/38] kselftest/arm64: Enable GCS for the FP stress tests Mark Brown
2024-02-03 12:26 ` [PATCH v8 38/38] kselftest: Provide shadow stack enable helpers for arm64 Mark Brown
2024-02-20  2:00 ` [PATCH v8 00/38] arm64/gcs: Provide support for GCS in userspace Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-02-20 16:36 ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-02-20 18:41   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-20 18:57     ` [musl] " Rich Felker
2024-02-20 23:30       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-20 23:54         ` dalias
2024-02-21  0:35           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-21  0:44             ` Mark Brown
2024-02-21  1:27             ` dalias
2024-02-21  2:11               ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-21  4:18                 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-21 13:53               ` Mark Brown
2024-02-21 14:58                 ` dalias
2024-02-21 17:36                   ` Mark Brown
2024-02-21 17:57                     ` dalias
2024-02-21 18:12                       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-21 18:30                         ` dalias
2024-02-21 18:53                           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-21 19:06                             ` dalias
2024-02-21 19:22                               ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-21 20:18                                 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2024-02-21 20:25                                   ` H.J. Lu
2024-02-21 21:12                                     ` H.J. Lu
2024-02-21 20:18                                 ` dalias
2024-02-22 13:57                                 ` Mark Brown
2024-02-21 18:32                       ` Mark Brown
2024-02-21 19:10                         ` dalias
2024-03-02 14:57                     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2024-03-02 15:05                       ` H.J. Lu
2024-03-14 14:03                       ` Mark Brown
2024-02-20 23:59         ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-02-21  0:40           ` Mark Brown
2024-02-21  4:30           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-20 20:14     ` Mark Brown
2024-02-20 23:30       ` Edgecombe, Rick P

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMe9rOoUO-D7Uoj9s3eq+w9pJBZ=iucEDpU4hqtJYtPmW5T4dQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=sorear@fastmail.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).