From: Jungseung Lee <js07.lee@samsung.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, js07.lee@samsung.com
Cc: tudor.ambarus@microchip.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
vigneshr@ti.com, js07.lee@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: add 4bit block protection support
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:22:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c4e70fcf58c93f9b7375d83b50028df225aed82.camel@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200122193608.3859-1-michael@walle.cc>
Hi, Michael
2020-01-22 (Wed), 20:36 +0100, Michael Walle:
> Hi,
>
> > Currently, we are supporting block protection only for
> > flash chips with 3 block protection bits in the SR register.
> > This patch enables block protection support for some flash with
> > 4 block protection bits(bp0-3).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jungseung Lee <js07.lee@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > v3 :
> > Fix wrong ofs calculation on v2 patch
> > v2 :
> > Add sample table portion about 4bit block protection on the
> > comment
> > Trivial coding style change
> >
> > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > ----
> > include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h | 8 +++
> > 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-
> > nor/spi-nor.c
> > index e3da6a8654a8..7e8af6c4fdfa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > @@ -238,6 +238,14 @@ struct flash_info {
> > * status register. Must be
> > used with
> > * SPI_NOR_HAS_TB.
> > */
> > +#define SPI_NOR_HAS_BP3 BIT(17) /*
> > + * Flash SR has 4 bit fields
> > (BP0-3)
> > + * for block protection.
> > + */
> > +#define SPI_NOR_BP3_SR_BIT6 BIT(18) /*
> > + * BP3 is bit 6 of status
> > register.
> > + * Must be used with
> > SPI_NOR_HAS_BP3.
> > + */
> >
> > /* Part specific fixup hooks. */
> > const struct spi_nor_fixups *fixups;
> > @@ -1767,23 +1775,47 @@ static void stm_get_locked_range(struct
> > spi_nor *nor, u8 sr, loff_t *ofs,
> > struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
> > u8 mask = SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0;
> > u8 tb_mask = SR_TB_BIT5;
> > - int pow;
> > + u8 bp;
> > + int pow = 0;
> >
> > if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB_BIT6)
> > tb_mask = SR_TB_BIT6;
> >
> > - if (!(sr & mask)) {
> > - /* No protection */
> > - *ofs = 0;
> > - *len = 0;
> > + if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3) {
> > + u8 tmp;
> > +
> > + if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3_BIT6)
> > + tmp = sr & (mask | SR_BP3_BIT6);
> > + else
> > + tmp = sr & (mask | SR_BP3_BIT5);
> > +
> > + if (tmp & SR_BP3_BIT6)
> > + tmp = (tmp & ~BIT(6)) | BIT(5);
> > +
> > + bp = tmp >> SR_BP_SHIFT;
> > + if (!bp) {
> > + *ofs = 0;
> > + *len = 0;
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (bp <= ilog2(nor->n_sectors))
> > + pow = ilog2(nor->n_sectors) + 1 - bp;
> > } else {
> > - pow = ((sr & mask) ^ mask) >> SR_BP_SHIFT;
> > - *len = mtd->size >> pow;
> > - if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB && sr & tb_mask)
> > + bp = (sr & mask) >> SR_BP_SHIFT;
> > + if (!bp) {
> > *ofs = 0;
> > - else
> > - *ofs = mtd->size - *len;
> > + *len = 0;
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + pow = bp ^ (mask >> SR_BP_SHIFT);
> > }
> > +
> > + *len = mtd->size >> pow;
> > +
> > + if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB && sr & tb_mask)
> > + *ofs = 0;
> > + else
> > + *ofs = mtd->size - *len;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1823,7 +1855,7 @@ static int stm_is_unlocked_sr(struct spi_nor
> > *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len,
> >
> > /*
> > * Lock a region of the flash. Compatible with ST Micro and
> > similar flash.
> > - * Supports the block protection bits BP{0,1,2} in the status
> > register
> > + * Supports the block protection bits BP{0,1,2,3} in the status
> > register
> > * (SR). Does not support these features found in newer SR
> > bitfields:
> > * - SEC: sector/block protect - only handle SEC=0 (block
> > protect)
> > * - CMP: complement protect - only support CMP=0 (range is not
> > complemented)
> > @@ -1831,7 +1863,7 @@ static int stm_is_unlocked_sr(struct spi_nor
> > *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len,
> > * Support for the following is provided conditionally for some
> > flash:
> > * - TB: top/bottom protect
> > *
> > - * Sample table portion for 8MB flash (Winbond w25q64fw):
> > + * Sample table portion for 8MB flash (Winbond w25q64fw / BP0-2):
> > *
> > * SEC | TB | BP2 | BP1 | BP0 | Prot Length |
> > Protected Portion
> > * ------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------------
> > @@ -1851,6 +1883,32 @@ static int stm_is_unlocked_sr(struct spi_nor
> > *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len,
> > * 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 MB | Lower
> > 1/4
> > * 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 MB | Lower
> > 1/2
> > *
> > + * Sample table portion for 64MB flash (Micron n25q512ax3 / BP0-
> > 3):
> > + *
> > + * TB | BP3 | BP2 | BP1 | BP0 | Prot Length |
> > Protected Portion
> > + * ------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------------
> > + * 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NONE | NONE
> > + * 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 64 KB | Upper
> > 1/1024
> > + * 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 128 KB | Upper
> > 1/512
> > + * 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 256 KB | Upper
> > 1/256
> > + * ...
> > + * 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16 MB | Upper
> > 1/4
> > + * 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 32 MB | Upper
> > 1/2
> > + * 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 64 MB | ALL
> > + * 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 64 MB | ALL
> > + * ...
> > + * ------|-------|-------|-------|-------|---------------|-------
> > ------------
> > + * 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NONE | NONE
> > + * 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 64 KB | Lower
> > 1/1024
> > + * 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 128 KB | Lower
> > 1/512
> > + * 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 256 KB | Lower
> > 1/256
> > + * ...
> > + * 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16 MB | Lower
> > 1/4
> > + * 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 32 MB | Lower
> > 1/2
> > + * 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 64 MB | ALL
> > + * 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 64 MB | ALL
> > + * ...
> > + *
> > * Returns negative on errors, 0 on success.
> > */
> > static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> > @@ -1898,6 +1956,12 @@ static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor,
> > loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> > if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB_BIT6)
> > tb_mask = SR_TB_BIT6;
> >
> > + if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3) {
> > + if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3_BIT6)
> > + mask = mask | SR_BP3_BIT6;
> > + else
> > + mask = mask | SR_BP3_BIT5;
> > + }
> > /*
> > * Need smallest pow such that:
> > *
> > @@ -1908,7 +1972,17 @@ static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor,
> > loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> > * pow = ceil(log2(size / len)) = log2(size) -
> > floor(log2(len))
> > */
> > pow = ilog2(mtd->size) - ilog2(lock_len);
> > - val = mask - (pow << SR_BP_SHIFT);
> > +
> > + if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3) {
> > + val = ilog2(nor->n_sectors) + 1 - pow;
>
> Why do you use a new calculation here? As far as I can see, the
> method is
> the same except that is has one bit more. That also raises the
> question why
> n_sectors is now needed?
>
> Can't we just initialize the mask with
>
> mask = SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0;
> if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3)
> mask |= SR_BP3_BIT5;
>
> do the calculation and checks and then move the SR_BP3_BIT5 to
> SR_BP3_BIT6
> if SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3_BIT6 is set.
>
For most of flashes that supporting BP0-2, the smallest protected
portion is fixed as 1/64 and it can be properly handled by existing
calculation. (Actually it's not fully generic, see flashes like
w25q40bw or m25p80. Of course, it doesn't have SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK flag
even though it has BP0-2 bit in SR)
We need new calculation method for 4bit block protection and for making
it more generic, I choose n_sectors.
On all the flashes I checked, n_sectors is proper value for getting
block protected portion.
density portion n_sectors
W25M512JV 64MB 1/512 512
N25Q128A 16MB 1/256 256
N25Q512A 64MB 1/1024 1024
MT25QL02GCBB 256MB 1/4096 4096
> > + val = val << SR_BP_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + if (val & BIT(5) && mask & SR_BP3_BIT6)
> > + val = (val & ~BIT(5)) | BIT(6);
> > + } else {
> > + val = mask - (pow << SR_BP_SHIFT);
> > + }
> > +
> > if (val & ~mask)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > /* Don't "lock" with no region! */
> > @@ -1983,6 +2057,13 @@ static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor,
> > loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> >
> > if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB_BIT6)
> > tb_mask = SR_TB_BIT6;
> > +
> > + if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3) {
> > + if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3_BIT6)
> > + mask = mask | SR_BP3_BIT6;
> > + else
> > + mask = mask | SR_BP3_BIT5;
> > + }
> > /*
> > * Need largest pow such that:
> > *
> > @@ -1995,13 +2076,20 @@ static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor,
> > loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> > pow = ilog2(mtd->size) - order_base_2(lock_len);
> > if (lock_len == 0) {
> > val = 0; /* fully unlocked */
> > + } else if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3) {
> > + val = ilog2(nor->n_sectors) + 1 - pow;
> > + val = val << SR_BP_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + if (val & BIT(5) && mask & SR_BP3_BIT6)
> > + val = (val & ~BIT(5)) | BIT(6);
> > } else {
> > val = mask - (pow << SR_BP_SHIFT);
> > - /* Some power-of-two sizes are not supported */
> > - if (val & ~mask)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Some power-of-two sizes are not supported */
> > + if (val & ~mask)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > status_new = (status_old & ~mask & ~tb_mask) | val;
> >
> > /* Don't protect status register if we're fully unlocked */
> > @@ -4736,6 +4824,7 @@ static void spi_nor_info_init_params(struct
> > spi_nor *nor)
> > /* Set SPI NOR sizes. */
> > params->size = (u64)info->sector_size * info->n_sectors;
> > params->page_size = info->page_size;
> > + params->n_sectors = info->n_sectors;
> >
> > if (!(info->flags & SPI_NOR_NO_FR)) {
> > /* Default to Fast Read for DT and non-DT platform
> > devices. */
> > @@ -5192,6 +5281,11 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const
> > char *name,
> > nor->flags |= SNOR_F_NO_OP_CHIP_ERASE;
> > if (info->flags & USE_CLSR)
> > nor->flags |= SNOR_F_USE_CLSR;
> > + if (info->flags & SPI_NOR_HAS_BP3) {
> > + nor->flags |= SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3;
> > + if (info->flags & SPI_NOR_BP3_SR_BIT6)
> > + nor->flags |= SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3_BIT6;
> > + }
> >
> > if (info->flags & SPI_NOR_NO_ERASE)
> > mtd->flags |= MTD_NO_ERASE;
> > @@ -5199,6 +5293,7 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const
> > char *name,
> > mtd->dev.parent = dev;
> > nor->page_size = params->page_size;
> > mtd->writebufsize = nor->page_size;
> > + nor->n_sectors = params->n_sectors;
> >
> > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "broken-flash-reset"))
> > nor->flags |= SNOR_F_BROKEN_RESET;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h b/include/linux/mtd/spi-
> > nor.h
> > index 541c06d042e8..92d550501daf 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> > @@ -129,7 +129,9 @@
> > #define SR_BP1 BIT(3) /* Block protect 1
> > */
> > #define SR_BP2 BIT(4) /* Block protect 2
> > */
> > #define SR_TB_BIT5 BIT(5) /* Top/Bottom protect */
> > +#define SR_BP3_BIT5 BIT(5) /* Block protect 3
> > */
>
> maybe just name it SR_BP3? would also be more consistent with the
> proposal
> above.
>
> > #define SR_TB_BIT6 BIT(6) /* Top/Bottom protect */
> > +#define SR_BP3_BIT6 BIT(6) /* Block protect 3
> > */
> > #define SR_SRWD BIT(7) /* SR write protect
> > */
> > /* Spansion/Cypress specific status bits */
> > #define SR_E_ERR BIT(5)
> > @@ -248,6 +250,8 @@ enum spi_nor_option_flags {
> > SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR = BIT(9),
> > SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR = BIT(10),
> > SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB_BIT6 = BIT(11),
> > + SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3 = BIT(12),
> > + SNOR_F_HAS_SR_BP3_BIT6 = BIT(13),
> >
> > };
> >
> > @@ -519,6 +523,7 @@ struct spi_nor_locking_ops {
> > *
> > * @size: the flash memory density in bytes.
> > * @page_size: the page size of the SPI NOR flash
> > memory.
> > + * @n_sectors: number of sectors
> > * @hwcaps: describes the read and page program
> > hardware
> > * capabilities.
> > * @reads: read capabilities ordered by priority: the
> > higher index
> > @@ -541,6 +546,7 @@ struct spi_nor_locking_ops {
> > struct spi_nor_flash_parameter {
> > u64 size;
> > u32 page_size;
> > + u16 n_sectors;
> >
> > struct spi_nor_hwcaps hwcaps;
> > struct spi_nor_read_command reads[SNOR_CMD_READ_MAX];
> > @@ -573,6 +579,7 @@ struct flash_info;
> > * @bouncebuf_size: size of the bounce buffer
> > * @info: spi-nor part JDEC MFR id and other info
> > * @page_size: the page size of the SPI NOR
> > + * @n_sector: number of sectors
> > * @addr_width: number of address bytes
> > * @erase_opcode: the opcode for erasing a sector
> > * @read_opcode: the read opcode
> > @@ -599,6 +606,7 @@ struct spi_nor {
> > size_t bouncebuf_size;
> > const struct flash_info *info;
> > u32 page_size;
> > + u16 n_sectors;
> > u8 addr_width;
> > u8 erase_opcode;
> > u8 read_opcode;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> >
https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=06b6dd5d-5b7d5a63-06b75612-0cc47a31309a-83164929001f7741&u=http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
> >
>
>
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200113055910epcas1p4f97dfeb465b00d66649d6321cffc7b5a@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2020-01-13 5:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: introduce SR_BP_SHIFT define Jungseung Lee
[not found] ` <CGME20200113055910epcas1p377b2618bea2ca860acac2b6f34e2b83e@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2020-01-13 5:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: add 4bit block protection support Jungseung Lee
2020-01-14 10:49 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-01-17 15:06 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-01-22 11:42 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-01-22 14:31 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-01-22 17:14 ` Michael Walle
2020-01-23 3:59 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-01-23 8:15 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-11 7:52 ` chenxiang (M)
2020-03-04 5:20 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-03-04 8:36 ` chenxiang (M)
2020-03-07 7:40 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-01-22 19:36 ` Michael Walle
2020-01-23 6:22 ` Jungseung Lee [this message]
2020-01-23 8:10 ` Michael Walle
2020-01-23 8:53 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-01-23 9:31 ` Michael Walle
2020-01-28 11:01 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-01-28 12:29 ` [SPAM] " Michael Walle
2020-01-30 8:17 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-01-30 8:36 ` [SPAM] " Michael Walle
2020-01-30 10:07 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-02-03 13:56 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2020-02-03 14:38 ` [SPAM] " Michael Walle
2020-02-03 14:58 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-02-03 17:31 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2020-02-07 12:17 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-02-10 8:33 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-10 9:47 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-02-10 9:59 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-02-10 10:40 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-10 11:27 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-02-10 12:14 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-10 15:50 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-02-10 10:29 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-10 11:26 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-02-19 10:50 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-02-19 11:08 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-19 11:23 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-02-19 11:36 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-20 19:09 ` Michael Walle
2020-02-21 9:30 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-02-25 8:20 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-02-25 9:25 ` Jungseung Lee
[not found] ` <CGME20200113055910epcas1p384c04182e7c643163d659d42fafd01b3@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2020-01-13 5:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: spi-nor: support lock/unlock for a few Micron chips Jungseung Lee
2020-01-13 12:30 ` John Garry
2020-01-13 12:40 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-01-13 12:45 ` Jungseung Lee
2020-01-13 13:00 ` John Garry
2020-02-17 0:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: introduce SR_BP_SHIFT define Tudor.Ambarus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c4e70fcf58c93f9b7375d83b50028df225aed82.camel@samsung.com \
--to=js07.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=js07.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).