linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:24:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131025132422.GC12932@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMg+Xi3+MZrPbRiMGFe2cQFjN9qaif9u5gW_tDzK62EB7w@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1014 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding

> > Yeah, I saw the devm_gpio_request_one() errors too. They happened for 3
> > boards on ARM I think. Must have forgotten to update the summary email.
> > I'll see if I can come up with a patch to fix the GPIO related build
> > failures, or at least report it to LinusW or Alexandre.

> Hmm.

> Please don't apply fixes like these directly to your tree, keep the
> broken parts (or drop the tree that introduced it). It makes the
> process of getting the fixes in where they really have to go much more
> error prone, since there's no way to track whether they have landed in
> the right place yet or not.

The rule I was applying (which I think is the same as Stephen applies)
is that I'd fix anything that was definitely the result of a merge issue
(like the build failure in misc due to a sysfs API change in the sysfs
tree) but not anything that was just plain broken in the tree in
isolation.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-25 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-24 16:31 linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 Thierry Reding
2013-10-24 20:02 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 (xilinx_uartps) Randy Dunlap
2013-10-25  5:02 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 Guenter Roeck
2013-10-25  8:35   ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:16     ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-25 13:24       ` Mark Brown [this message]
2013-10-25 13:33         ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-25 15:45           ` Mark Brown
2013-10-25 13:35       ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:43         ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-25 14:17           ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 15:02             ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-25 15:17               ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 17:17                 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-25 18:04                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-10-25 13:03 ` linux-next: manual merge of the c6x tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:03   ` linux-next: manual merge of the h8300-remove tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:35     ` Mark Salter
2013-10-25 15:09     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-25 13:03   ` linux-next: manual merge of the mfd-lj tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:03   ` linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:25     ` Will Deacon
2013-10-26  8:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-26 14:01         ` Will Deacon
2013-10-27  7:12           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-27 10:00             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-28  7:47               ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-28  8:45                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-25 13:03   ` linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:07     ` Marc Zyngier
2013-10-25 13:03   ` linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:22   ` linux-next: manual merge of the c6x tree Mark Salter
2013-10-25 13:36     ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-26 13:19   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-28  7:34     ` Thierry Reding
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-24  6:48 linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-24  4:17 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-24  5:55 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-24  3:02 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-24  4:19 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131025132422.GC12932@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).