linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
	bjorn@helgaas.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Validate with the return value of pcie_capability_read_*()
Date: Mon,  6 Jul 2020 11:31:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200706093121.9731-5-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200706093121.9731-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>

From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>

On failure pcie_capability_read_dword() sets it's last parameter,
val to 0. 
However, with Patch 11/11, it is possible that val is set to ~0 on
failure. This would introduce a bug because (x & x) == (~0 & x).

This bug can be avoided if the return value of pcie_capability_read_dword
is checked to confirm success.

Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_dword() to ensure success.
Return a value that indicate the result of pcie_capability_read_dword().

Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@helgaas.com>
Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index 5af281d97d4f..0b691e37fd04 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -277,10 +277,11 @@ static void pcie_wait_for_presence(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
 	int timeout = 1250;
 	u16 slot_status;
+	int ret;
 
 	do {
-		pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &slot_status);
-		if (slot_status & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS)
+		ret = pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &slot_status);
+		if (!ret && (slot_status & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS))
 			return;
 		msleep(10);
 		timeout -= 10;
@@ -354,12 +355,13 @@ int pciehp_get_raw_indicator_status(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug_slot,
 	struct controller *ctrl = to_ctrl(hotplug_slot);
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl_dev(ctrl);
 	u16 slot_ctrl;
+	int ret;
 
 	pci_config_pm_runtime_get(pdev);
-	pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, &slot_ctrl);
+	ret = pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, &slot_ctrl);
 	pci_config_pm_runtime_put(pdev);
 	*status = (slot_ctrl & (PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC | PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC)) >> 6;
-	return 0;
+	return pcibios_err_to_errno(ret);
 }
 
 int pciehp_get_attention_status(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug_slot, u8 *status)
@@ -367,9 +369,10 @@ int pciehp_get_attention_status(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug_slot, u8 *status)
 	struct controller *ctrl = to_ctrl(hotplug_slot);
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl_dev(ctrl);
 	u16 slot_ctrl;
+	int ret;
 
 	pci_config_pm_runtime_get(pdev);
-	pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, &slot_ctrl);
+	ret = pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, &slot_ctrl);
 	pci_config_pm_runtime_put(pdev);
 	ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s: SLOTCTRL %x, value read %x\n", __func__,
 		 pci_pcie_cap(ctrl->pcie->port) + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, slot_ctrl);
@@ -389,7 +392,7 @@ int pciehp_get_attention_status(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug_slot, u8 *status)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	return pcibios_err_to_errno(ret);
 }
 
 void pciehp_get_power_status(struct controller *ctrl, u8 *status)
-- 
2.18.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-06 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200706093121.9731-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 3/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Validate with the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa [this message]
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 5/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Make "Power On" the default Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-10  0:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-10 21:42     ` Saheed Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 7/11 RFC] PCI: Validate with the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 8/11 RFC] PCI/PM: Use error return value from pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 10/11 RFC] PCI/ASPM: " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-10  0:11 ` [PATCH 0/11 RFC] PCI: Remove "*val = 0" " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-10 21:32   ` Saheed Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200706093121.9731-5-refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn@helgaas.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).