linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saheed Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: bjorn@helgaas.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Make "Power On" the default
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:42:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee4e0e13-baed-9800-8ff7-a91186bf1f8a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200710001406.GA30420@bjorn-Precision-5520>


On 7/10/20 2:14 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:31:15AM +0200, Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa wrote:
>> From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
>>
>> The default case of the switch statement is redundant since
>> PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC is only a single bit. pcie_capability_read_word()
>> currently causes "On" value to be set if it fails. Patch 11/11
>> changes the behaviour of pcie_capability_read_word() so on falure the
>> "Off" value will be set.
> s/falure/failure/
>
> Split this into two patches.  The removal of the default case should
> be in its own patch to make it trivial to review.
>
Thank you for the review. It is now split into two in the version 3 
which I just sent.

- Saheed


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-10 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200706093121.9731-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 3/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Validate with the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 4/11 " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 5/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Make "Power On" the default Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-10  0:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-10 21:42     ` Saheed Bolarinwa [this message]
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 7/11 RFC] PCI: Validate with the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 8/11 RFC] PCI/PM: Use error return value from pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 10/11 RFC] PCI/ASPM: " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-10  0:11 ` [PATCH 0/11 RFC] PCI: Remove "*val = 0" " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-10 21:32   ` Saheed Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee4e0e13-baed-9800-8ff7-a91186bf1f8a@gmail.com \
    --to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn@helgaas.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).