linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] s390/pci: expose UID checking state in sysfs
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:55:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210113185500.GA1918216@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f5013a1-3dde-1633-a0cc-591fc439e29d@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:47:58AM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On 1/12/21 10:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> >> We use the UID of a zPCI adapter, or the UID of the function zero if
> >> there are multiple functions in an adapter, as PCI domain if and only if
> >> UID Checking is turned on.
> >> Otherwise we automatically generate domains as devices appear.
> >>
> >> The state of UID Checking is thus essential to know if the PCI domain
> >> will be stable, yet currently there is no way to access this information
> >> from userspace.
> >> So let's solve this by showing the state of UID checking as a sysfs
> >> attribute in /sys/bus/pci/uid_checking

> >> +/* Global zPCI attributes */
> >> +static ssize_t uid_checking_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> >> +				 struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >> +{
> >> +	return sprintf(buf, "%i\n", zpci_unique_uid);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static struct kobj_attribute sys_zpci_uid_checking_attr =
> >> +	__ATTR(uid_checking, 0444, uid_checking_show, NULL);
> > 
> > Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO instead of __ATTR.
> 
> It's my understanding that DEVICE_ATTR_* is only for
> per device attributes. This one is global for the entire
> Z PCI. I just tried with BUS_ATTR_RO instead
> and that works but only if I put the attribute at
> /sys/bus/pci/uid_checking instead of with a zpci
> subfolder. This path would work for us too, we
> currently don't have any other global attributes
> that we are planning to expose but those could of
> course come up in the future.

Ah, I missed the fact that this is a kobj_attribute, not a
device_attribute.  Maybe KERNEL_ATTR_RO()?  Very few uses so far, but
seems like it might fit?

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-13 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-11  9:38 [RFC 0/1] PCI: s390 global attribute "UID Checking" Niklas Schnelle
2021-01-11  9:38 ` [RFC 1/1] s390/pci: expose UID checking state in sysfs Niklas Schnelle
2021-01-12 21:50   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-01-13  7:47     ` Niklas Schnelle
2021-01-13 18:55       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2021-01-14 13:20         ` Niklas Schnelle
2021-01-14 13:44           ` Christian Brauner
2021-01-14 13:58             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-14 15:06               ` Niklas Schnelle
2021-01-14 15:17                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-14 15:51                   ` Niklas Schnelle
2021-01-14 16:14                     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-15 11:20                       ` Niklas Schnelle
2021-01-15 12:02                         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-15 15:29                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-01-15 16:15                           ` Niklas Schnelle
2021-01-21 15:31                           ` Niklas Schnelle
2021-01-21 15:54                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-01-21 16:11                               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-21 17:04                               ` Niklas Schnelle
2021-01-21 17:28                                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-21 17:43                                   ` Niklas Schnelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210113185500.GA1918216@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).