Re: PCI device function not being enumerated [Was: PCMCIA not working on Panasonic Toughbook CF-29]

[Trevor Jacobs <trevor_jacobs@aol.com>]

That's correct, I tested a bunch of the old distros including slackware, 
and 2.6.32 is where the problem began.

Also, the Panasonic Toughbook CF-29s effected that we tested are the 
later marks, MK4 and MK5 for certain. The MK2 CF-29 worked just fine 
because it has different hardware supporting the PCMCIA slots. I have 
not tested a MK3 but suspect it would work ok as it also uses the older 
hardware.

Thanks for your help guys!
Trevor

On 2/25/20 7:50 PM, Michael . wrote:
> Through our own testing it hasn't worked on any of the regular Linux
> releases (both Deb and RPM varieties, and I think someone tested Arch
> or Slackware as well) after 2.6.32 .
>
> On 26/02/2020, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:03:32PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 17:56, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:02:50PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>>> [+cc Ulf, Philip, Pierre, Maxim, linux-mmc; see [1] for beginning of
>>>>> thread, [2] for problem report and the patch Michael tested]
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:58:27PM +1100, Michael . wrote:
>>>>>> Bjorn and Dominik.
>>>>>> I am happy to let you know the patch did the trick, it compiled
>>>>>> well
>>>>>> on 5.4-rc4 and my friends in the CC list have tested the modified
>>>>>> kernel and confirmed that both slots are now working as they
>>>>>> should.
>>>>>> As a group of dedicated Toughbook users and Linux users please
>>>>>> accept
>>>>>> our thanks your efforts and assistance is greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that we know this patch works what kernel do you think it will
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> released in? Will it make 5.4 or will it be put into 5.5
>>>>>> development
>>>>>> for further testing?
>>>>> That patch was not intended to be a fix; it was just to test my guess
>>>>> that the quirk might be related.
>>>>>
>>>>> Removing the quirk solved the problem *you're* seeing, but the quirk
>>>>> was added in the first place to solve some other problem, and if we
>>>>> simply remove the quirk, we may reintroduce the original problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> So we have to look at the history and figure out some way to solve
>>>>> both problems.  I cc'd some people who might have insight.  Here are
>>>>> some commits that look relevant:
>>>>>
>>>>>    5ae70296c85f ("mmc: Disabler for Ricoh MMC controller")
>>>>>    03cd8f7ebe0c ("ricoh_mmc: port from driver to pci quirk")
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAFjuqNi+knSb9WVQOahCVFyxsiqoGgwoM7Z1aqDBebNzp_-jYw@mail.gmail.com/
>>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191021160952.GA229204@google.com/
>>>> I guess this problem is still unfixed?  I hate the fact that we broke
>>>> something that used to work.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we need some sort of DMI check in ricoh_mmc_fixup_rl5c476() so
>>>> we skip it for Toughbooks?  Or maybe we limit the quirk to the
>>>> machines where it was originally needed?
>>> Both options seems reasonable to me. Do you have time to put together a
>>> patch?
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Uffe
>> The quirk is controlled by MMC_RICOH_MMC configuration option. At least
>> as a short-term fix a bit better than patching the kernel, building one
>> with that config option disabled should have the same effect.
>>
>>  From the commit messages, the quirk was required to support MMC (as
>> opposed to SD) cards in the SD slot. I would assume this will be an
>> issue with the chip in any machine as the commit indicates that the
>> hardware in the chip detects MMC cards and doesn't expose them through
>> the SDHCI function.
>>
>> It looks like the quirk was only enabled by default in 2015, at least
>> upstream [1], though in Debian it was enabled in May 2010 going by their
>> git repo, maybe in 2.6.32-16.
>>
>> [1] commit ba2f73250e4a ("mmc: Enable Ricoh MMC quirk by default")
>>