linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Cc: PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Restore ATU memory resource setup to use last entry
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:02:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+XpcawbxLv2gZLCfDZczkv8LSukUHQFMFwtPg=Pe07ig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b68c285e-3991-2577-30d5-a5b0bef80752@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:49 AM Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/26/2020 9:18 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >
> >
> > Prior to commit 0f71c60ffd26 ("PCI: dwc: Remove storing of PCI
> > resources"), the DWC driver was setting up the last memory resource
> > rather than the first memory resource. This doesn't matter for most
> > platforms which only have 1 memory resource, but it broke Tegra194 which
> > has a 2nd (prefetchable) memory region which requires an ATU entry. The
> > first region on Tegra194 relies on the default 1:1 pass-thru of outbound
> > transactions which doesn't need an ATU entry.
> >
> > Fixes: 0f71c60ffd26 ("PCI: dwc: Remove storing of PCI resources")
> > Reported-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 8 ++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > index 674f32db85ca..44c2a6572199 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > @@ -586,8 +586,12 @@ void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
> >           * ATU, so we should not program the ATU here.
> >           */
> >          if (pp->bridge->child_ops == &dw_child_pcie_ops) {
> > -               struct resource_entry *entry =
> > -                       resource_list_first_type(&pp->bridge->windows, IORESOURCE_MEM);
> > +               struct resource_entry *tmp, *entry = NULL;
> > +
> > +               /* Get last memory resource entry */
> > +               resource_list_for_each_entry(tmp, &pp->bridge->windows)
> > +                       if (resource_type(tmp->res) == IORESOURCE_MEM)
> > +                               entry = tmp;
> This patch works for Tegra194 with its 'ranges' property in its current
> shape. But, this still doesn't work if ATU mapping needs to be set for
> both prefetchable and non-prefetchable regions.

Supporting both is not a current feature and therefore not 5.10
material. This patch is intended for 5.10. Adding support for multiple
memory regions would be 5.11 material.

> The series I pushed at
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=209764 works
> for this condition as well.

I have an alternative implementation that I'll send out shortly.

> When it comes to configuring the ATU to handle multiple memory apertures
> (which is the ultimate goal), I think we need to understand the side
> effects of removing I/O mapping in platforms where the number of view
> ports available are not enough to have I/O mapping.

We don't have that case upstream AFAICT. Tegra is the only platform
with more than 1 memory region which could cause a change in behavior.
In any case, I'm not removing the sharing of ATU for config and i/o
(though I think we should). I am adding a warning though.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-26 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-26 15:48 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Restore ATU memory resource setup to use last entry Rob Herring
2020-10-26 16:22 ` Jingoo Han
2020-10-26 16:49 ` Vidya Sagar
2020-10-26 18:02   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2020-11-03 16:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-11-03 19:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAL_Jsq+XpcawbxLv2gZLCfDZczkv8LSukUHQFMFwtPg=Pe07ig@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).