From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:24:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2c02af7-1d6f-e54f-c7fb-99c5b7776014@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190129191120.GE3176@redhat.com>
On 2019-01-29 12:11 p.m., Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:36:29AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019-01-29 10:47 a.m., jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Optional for device driver that want to allow peer to peer (p2p)
>>> + * mapping of their vma (which can be back by some device memory) to
>>> + * another device.
>>> + *
>>> + * Note that the exporting device driver might not have map anything
>>> + * inside the vma for the CPU but might still want to allow a peer
>>> + * device to access the range of memory corresponding to a range in
>>> + * that vma.
>>> + *
>>> + * FOR PREDICTABILITY IF DRIVER SUCCESSFULY MAP A RANGE ONCE FOR A
>>> + * DEVICE THEN FURTHER MAPPING OF THE SAME IF THE VMA IS STILL VALID
>>> + * SHOULD ALSO BE SUCCESSFUL. Following this rule allow the importing
>>> + * device to map once during setup and report any failure at that time
>>> + * to the userspace. Further mapping of the same range might happen
>>> + * after mmu notifier invalidation over the range. The exporting device
>>> + * can use this to move things around (defrag BAR space for instance)
>>> + * or do other similar task.
>>> + *
>>> + * IMPORTER MUST OBEY mmu_notifier NOTIFICATION AND CALL p2p_unmap()
>>> + * WHEN A NOTIFIER IS CALL FOR THE RANGE ! THIS CAN HAPPEN AT ANY
>>> + * POINT IN TIME WITH NO LOCK HELD.
>>> + *
>>> + * In below function, the device argument is the importing device,
>>> + * the exporting device is the device to which the vma belongs.
>>> + */
>>> + long (*p2p_map)(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + struct device *device,
>>> + unsigned long start,
>>> + unsigned long end,
>>> + dma_addr_t *pa,
>>> + bool write);
>>> + long (*p2p_unmap)(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + struct device *device,
>>> + unsigned long start,
>>> + unsigned long end,
>>> + dma_addr_t *pa);
>>
>> I don't understand why we need new p2p_[un]map function pointers for
>> this. In subsequent patches, they never appear to be set anywhere and
>> are only called by the HMM code. I'd have expected it to be called by
>> some core VMA code and set by HMM as that's what vm_operations_struct is
>> for.
>>
>> But the code as all very confusing, hard to follow and seems to be
>> missing significant chunks. So I'm not really sure what is going on.
>
> It is set by device driver when userspace do mmap(fd) where fd comes
> from open("/dev/somedevicefile"). So it is set by device driver. HMM
> has nothing to do with this. It must be set by device driver mmap
> call back (mmap callback of struct file_operations). For this patch
> you can completely ignore all the HMM patches. Maybe posting this as
> 2 separate patchset would make it clearer.
>
> For instance see [1] for how a non HMM driver can export its memory
> by just setting those callback. Note that a proper implementation of
> this should also include some kind of driver policy on what to allow
> to map and what to not allow ... All this is driver specific in any
> way.
I'd suggest [1] should be a part of the patchset so we can actually see
a user of the stuff you're adding.
But it still doesn't explain everything as without the HMM code nothing
calls the new vm_ops. And there's still no callers for the p2p_test
functions you added. And I still don't understand why we need the new
vm_ops or who calls them and when. Why can't drivers use the existing
'fault' vm_op and call a new helper function to map p2p when appropriate
or a different helper function to map a large range in its mmap
operation? Just like regular mmap code...
Logan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-29 17:47 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Device peer to peer (p2p) through vma jglisse
2019-01-29 17:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] pci/p2p: add a function to test peer to peer capability jglisse
2019-01-29 18:24 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 19:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-29 19:53 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 20:44 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 21:00 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 19:56 ` Alex Deucher
2019-01-29 20:00 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 20:24 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 21:28 ` Alex Deucher
2019-01-30 10:25 ` Christian König
2019-01-29 17:47 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] drivers/base: " jglisse
2019-01-29 18:26 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 19:54 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 19:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-29 19:56 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 17:47 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma jglisse
2019-01-29 18:36 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 19:11 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 19:24 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-01-29 19:44 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 20:43 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-29 19:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 19:50 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 20:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 20:44 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 23:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 0:08 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 4:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 15:43 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 20:39 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 20:57 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 21:30 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 21:50 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 22:58 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 23:47 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 1:17 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 2:48 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 4:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-30 15:49 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 19:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 19:45 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 19:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 21:01 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 21:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 22:52 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 23:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-31 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 15:37 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-31 19:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-31 19:19 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-31 19:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-31 19:35 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-31 19:44 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-31 19:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 17:17 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 18:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 19:22 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 19:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 20:00 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 20:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 20:43 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 20:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 21:45 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 21:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 22:30 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 22:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 22:47 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 22:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 22:58 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 19:52 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 20:35 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 20:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-30 10:33 ` Koenig, Christian
2019-01-30 15:55 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 17:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-30 17:32 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 17:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 18:05 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 17:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 18:13 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 18:50 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-31 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 15:03 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-30 19:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 19:48 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-30 20:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-31 8:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 15:11 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-01-29 17:47 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] mm/hmm: add support for peer to peer to HMM device memory jglisse
2019-01-29 17:47 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] mm/hmm: add support for peer to peer to special device vma jglisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c2c02af7-1d6f-e54f-c7fb-99c5b7776014@deltatee.com \
--to=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).