linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, phil@raspberrypi.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mbrugger@suse.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jeremy.linton@arm.com, Tom Joseph <tjoseph@cadence.com>,
	wahrenst@gmx.net, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] linux/log2.h: Add roundup/rounddown_pow_two64() family of functions
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:00:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191119170019.GU43905@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119165502.GB4991@ziepe.ca>

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:55:02PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 04:28:50PM +0000, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:43:39PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 12:30 +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > > Hi Andrew, thanks for the review.
> > > > > > +/**
> > > > > > + * __roundup_pow_of_two64() - round 64bit value up to nearest power of
> > > > > > two
> > > > > > + * @n: value to round up
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +static inline __attribute__((const)) __u64 __roundup_pow_of_two64(__u64
> > > > > > n)
> > > > > 
> > > > > To be consistent with other functions in the same file (__ilog_u64) you may
> > > > > want to rename this to __roundup_pow_of_two_u64.
> > > > 
> > > > Sounds good to me.
> > > > 
> > > > > Also do you know why u64 is used in some places and __u64 in others?
> > > > 
> > > > That's unwarranted, it should be __u64 everywhere.
> > > 
> > > Sorry, now that I look deeper into it, it should be u64.
> > 
> > Do you know the reason why? I'd be interested to know.
> 
> __u64 must be used in header files that are under uapi - ie it is the
> name of the symbol in userspace, and u64 does not exist.
> 
> u64 should be used in all code that is only inside the kernel, ie .c
> files, internal headers, etc
> 
> I routinely discourage use of __uXX in kernel native code.

Thanks for this, much appreciated!

Andrew Murray

> 
> Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-19 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-12 15:59 [PATCH v2 0/6] Raspberry Pi 4 PCIe support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-11-12 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] linux/log2.h: Add roundup/rounddown_pow_two64() family of functions Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-11-19 11:13   ` Andrew Murray
2019-11-19 11:30     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-11-19 12:43       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-11-19 16:28         ` Andrew Murray
2019-11-19 16:55           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-19 17:00             ` Andrew Murray [this message]
2019-11-19 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Raspberry Pi 4 PCIe support Andrew Murray
2019-11-19 11:49   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-11-21 12:18     ` Andrew Murray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191119170019.GU43905@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbrugger@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=phil@raspberrypi.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=tjoseph@cadence.com \
    --cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).