linux-remoteproc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
Cc: agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tsoni@codeaurora.org,
	psodagud@codeaurora.org, rishabhb@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] remoteproc: qcom: Add per subsystem SSR notification
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:07:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200415180716.GD16583@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1586389003-26675-6-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org>

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 04:36:42PM -0700, Siddharth Gupta wrote:
> Currently there is a global notification chain which is called whenever any
> remoteproc shuts down. This leads to all the listeners being notified, and
> is not an optimal design as kernel drivers might only be interested in
> listening to notifications from a particular remoteproc. Create an
> individual notifier chain for every SSR subdevice, and modify the
> notification registration API to include the remoteproc struct as an
> argument. Update the existing user of the registration API to get the
> phandle of the remoteproc dt node to register for SSR notifications.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c      | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.h      |  1 +
>  drivers/soc/qcom/glink_ssr.c          | 20 ++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h | 17 ++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c
> index 1d2351b..56b0c3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c
> @@ -23,8 +23,6 @@
>  #define to_smd_subdev(d) container_of(d, struct qcom_rproc_subdev, subdev)
>  #define to_ssr_subdev(d) container_of(d, struct qcom_rproc_ssr, subdev)
>  
> -static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(ssr_notifiers);
> -
>  static int glink_subdev_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_rproc_glink *glink = to_glink_subdev(subdev);
> @@ -180,27 +178,52 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_remove_smd_subdev);
>  
>  /**
>   * qcom_register_ssr_notifier() - register SSR notification handler
> + * @rproc:	pointer to the remoteproc structure
>   * @nb:		notifier_block to notify for restart notifications
>   *
> - * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on failure.
> + * Returns pointer to srcu notifier head on success, ERR_PTR on failure.
>   *
> - * This register the @notify function as handler for restart notifications. As
> - * remote processors are stopped this function will be called, with the SSR
> - * name passed as a parameter.
> + * This registers the @notify function as handler for restart notifications. As
> + * remote processors are stopped this function will be called, with the rproc
> + * pointer passed as a parameter.
>   */
> -int qcom_register_ssr_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> +void *qcom_register_ssr_notifier(struct rproc *rproc, struct notifier_block *nb)
>  {
> -	return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&ssr_notifiers, nb);
> +	struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
> +	struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr;
> +	int ret;

Variable 'ret' needs to be initalised to -ENOENT.

> +
> +	if (!rproc)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
> +		ret = strcmp(subdev->name, "ssr_notifs");
> +		if (!ret)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);

If the rproc->subdevs list is empty to_ssr_subdev() will generate a coredump.

With the above:

Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

> +
> +	ssr = to_ssr_subdev(subdev);
> +	srcu_notifier_chain_register(ssr->rproc_notif_list, nb);
> +
> +	return ssr->rproc_notif_list;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_register_ssr_notifier);
>  
>  /**
>   * qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier() - unregister SSR notification handler
> + * @notify:	pointer to srcu notifier head
>   * @nb:		notifier_block to unregister
>   */
> -void qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> +int qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(void *notify, struct notifier_block *nb)
>  {
> -	blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&ssr_notifiers, nb);
> +	if (!notify)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return srcu_notifier_chain_unregister(notify, nb);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier);
>  
> @@ -208,7 +231,7 @@ static void ssr_notify_unprepare(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr = to_ssr_subdev(subdev);
>  
> -	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&ssr_notifiers, 0, (void *)ssr->name);
> +	srcu_notifier_call_chain(ssr->rproc_notif_list, 0, (void *)ssr->name);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -226,6 +249,9 @@ void qcom_add_ssr_subdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr,
>  	ssr->name = ssr_name;
>  	ssr->subdev.name = kstrdup("ssr_notifs", GFP_KERNEL);
>  	ssr->subdev.unprepare = ssr_notify_unprepare;
> +	ssr->rproc_notif_list = kzalloc(sizeof(struct srcu_notifier_head),
> +								GFP_KERNEL);
> +	srcu_init_notifier_head(ssr->rproc_notif_list);
>  
>  	rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &ssr->subdev);
>  }
> @@ -239,6 +265,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_add_ssr_subdev);
>  void qcom_remove_ssr_subdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct qcom_rproc_ssr *ssr)
>  {
>  	kfree(ssr->subdev.name);
> +	kfree(ssr->rproc_notif_list);
>  	rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &ssr->subdev);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_remove_ssr_subdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.h
> index 58de71e..7792691 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct qcom_rproc_subdev {
>  struct qcom_rproc_ssr {
>  	struct rproc_subdev subdev;
>  
> +	struct srcu_notifier_head *rproc_notif_list;
>  	const char *name;
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/glink_ssr.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/glink_ssr.c
> index d7babe3..2b39683 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/glink_ssr.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/glink_ssr.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  #include <linux/completion.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/notifier.h>
> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>  #include <linux/rpmsg.h>
>  #include <linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h>
>  
> @@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ struct glink_ssr {
>  	struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept;
>  
>  	struct notifier_block nb;
> +	void *notifier_head;
>  
>  	u32 seq_num;
>  	struct completion completion;
> @@ -112,6 +114,7 @@ static int qcom_glink_ssr_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
>  static int qcom_glink_ssr_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>  {
>  	struct glink_ssr *ssr;
> +	struct rproc *rproc;
>  
>  	ssr = devm_kzalloc(&rpdev->dev, sizeof(*ssr), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!ssr)
> @@ -125,14 +128,27 @@ static int qcom_glink_ssr_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>  
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&rpdev->dev, ssr);
>  
> -	return qcom_register_ssr_notifier(&ssr->nb);
> +	rproc = rproc_get_by_child(&rpdev->dev);
> +	if (!rproc) {
> +		dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "glink device not child of rproc\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ssr->notifier_head = qcom_register_ssr_notifier(rproc, &ssr->nb);
> +	if (IS_ERR(ssr->notifier_head)) {
> +		dev_err(&rpdev->dev,
> +			"failed to register for ssr notifications\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(ssr->notifier_head);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void qcom_glink_ssr_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>  {
>  	struct glink_ssr *ssr = dev_get_drvdata(&rpdev->dev);
>  
> -	qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(&ssr->nb);
> +	qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(ssr->notifier_head, &ssr->nb);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct rpmsg_device_id qcom_glink_ssr_match[] = {
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h
> index fa8e386..89e830a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h
> @@ -2,20 +2,27 @@
>  #define __QCOM_RPROC_H__
>  
>  struct notifier_block;
> +struct rproc;
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QCOM_RPROC_COMMON)
>  
> -int qcom_register_ssr_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> -void qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> +void *qcom_register_ssr_notifier(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				 struct notifier_block *nb);
> +int qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(void *notify, struct notifier_block *nb);
>  
>  #else
>  
> -static inline int qcom_register_ssr_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> +static inline void *qcom_register_ssr_notifier(struct rproc *rproc,
> +					       struct notifier_block *nb)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) {}
> +static inline int qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(void *notify,
> +					       struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  
>  #endif
>  
> -- 
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-15 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-08 23:36 [PATCH v2 0/6] remoteproc: qcom: Add callbacks for remoteproc events Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 23:36 ` Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] remoteproc: sysmon: Add ability to send type of notification Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-15 17:03   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 17:03     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-20  7:05   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  7:05     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-08 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] remoteproc: sysmon: Add notifications for events Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 23:36   ` Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-15 17:03   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 17:03     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-20  7:05   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  7:05     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-08 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] remoteproc: sysmon: Inform current rproc about all active rprocs Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 23:36   ` Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-15 17:16   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 17:16     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-20  7:09   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  7:09     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-08 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] remoteproc: qcom: Add name field for every subdevice Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 23:36   ` Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-15 18:11   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 18:11     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-23  0:54   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-23  0:54     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-08 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] remoteproc: qcom: Add per subsystem SSR notification Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 23:36   ` Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-15 18:07   ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2020-04-15 18:07     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-23  0:53   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-23  0:53     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-08 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] remoteproc: qcom: Add notification types to SSR Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 23:36   ` Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-15 18:10   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 18:10     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-23  0:58   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-23  0:58     ` Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200415180716.GD16583@xps15 \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rishabhb@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sidgup@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).