From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] PCI: rcar: Add L1 link state fix into data abort hook
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 20:39:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62e8d92a-806b-15fb-672d-2519d5a2fa4b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210719172340.vvtnddbli2vgxndi@pali>
On 7/19/21 7:23 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
[...]
>>>> The R-Car PCIe controller is capable of handling L0s/L1 link states.
>>>> While the controller can enter and exit L0s link state, and exit L1
>>>> link state, without any additional action from the driver, to enter
>>>> L1 link state, the driver must complete the link state transition by
>>>> issuing additional commands to the controller.
>>>>
>>>> The problem is, this transition is not atomic. The controller sets
>>>> PMEL1RX bit in PMSR register upon reception of PM_ENTER_L1 DLLP from
>>>> the PCIe card, but then the controller enters some sort of inbetween
>>>> state. The driver must detect this condition and complete the link
>>>> state transition, by setting L1IATN bit in PMCTLR and waiting for
>>>> the link state transition to complete.
>>>>
>>>> If a PCIe access happens inside this window, where the controller
>>>> is between L0 and L1 link states, the access generates a fault and
>>>> the ARM 'imprecise external abort' handler is invoked.
>
> And if PCIe MMIO access does not happen, what fixes this issue?
Then you have no problem because you don't hit this fault.
> In this
> patch is implemented only arm32 external abort hook handler (which is
> called only when PCIe MMIO access happens and aborts).
Yes, for the aarch64 rcar the same fix is implemented in atf (see below).
>>>> Just like other PCI controller drivers, here we hook the fault handler,
>>>> perform the fixup to help the controller enter L1 link state, and then
>>>> restart the instruction which triggered the fault. Since the controller
>>>> is in L1 link state now, the link can exit from L1 link state to L0 and
>>>> successfully complete the access.
>
> Link cannot directly goes to L0 from L1. It first goes to Recovery state
> and in this state card can "disconnect" or reset...
>
> What would happen if PCIe MMIO access is issued when link is not in some
> L* state? (This can be manually triggered by PCIe Hot Reset - toggling
> Secondary Bus Reset bit in Bridge Control register on parent PCIe Bridge
> device) Is R-Car working in this case and does not crash?
This seems to be exactly the situation the commit message describes --
the controller is stuck between L states and needs manual register write
to proceed.
[...]
>>> To be clear, I'm not objecting to the patch. It's a hardware problem
>>> and we should work around it as best we can.
>
> I'm not sure if current API of hook_fault_code or rather whole usage of
> it is prepared to expand into more and more drivers. Last time I looked
> at this arm32 part, it was possible to register only one callback from
> driver. So extending usage of this hook API can result that two drivers
> start fighting who register it earlier...
There doesn't seem to be much ongoing HW development on the arm32 r-car,
so I don't expect this list of hooks to grow much on this platform.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-19 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-14 20:05 [PATCH V6] PCI: rcar: Add L1 link state fix into data abort hook marek.vasut
2021-05-17 7:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-07-17 17:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-17 18:14 ` Marek Vasut
2021-07-19 8:59 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-07-19 15:38 ` Marek Vasut
2021-07-19 17:23 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-19 18:39 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2021-07-22 20:31 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-19 22:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-27 16:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-07-27 16:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-07-26 14:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-07-26 17:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-27 16:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 18:30 ` Pali Rohár
2021-07-27 17:08 ` Marek Vasut
2021-08-04 11:06 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62e8d92a-806b-15fb-672d-2519d5a2fa4b@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).