linux-renesas-soc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 6/6] PCI: rcar: Fix 64bit MSI message address handling
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:32:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUEDR+oTAXeE+rjzHw5HzsjB_SerJZP4b8uDtfxTht-ew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190325114101.10198-6-marek.vasut@gmail.com>

Hi Marek,

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:41 PM <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>
> The MSI message address in the RC address space can be 64 bit. The
> R-Car PCIe RC supports such a 64bit MSI message address as well.
> The code currently uses virt_to_phys(__get_free_pages()) to obtain
> a reserved page for the MSI message address, and the return value
> of which can be a 64 bit physical address on 64 bit system.
>
> However, the driver only programs PCIEMSIALR register with the bottom
> 32 bits of the virt_to_phys(__get_free_pages()) return value and does
> not program the top 32 bits into PCIEMSIAUR, but rather programs the
> PCIEMSIAUR register with 0x0. This worked fine on older 32 bit R-Car
> SoCs, however may fail on new 64 bit R-Car SoCs.
>
> Since from a PCIe controller perspective, an inbound MSI is a memory
> write to a special address (in case of this controller, defined by
> the value in PCIEMSIAUR:PCIEMSIALR), which triggers an interrupt, but
> never hits the DRAM _and_ because allocation of an MSI by a PCIe card
> driver obtains the MSI message address by reading PCIEMSIAUR:PCIEMSIALR
> in rcar_msi_setup_irqs(), incorrectly programmed PCIEMSIAUR cannot
> cause memory corruption or other issues.
>
> There is however the possibility that if virt_to_phys(__get_free_pages())
> returned address above the 32bit boundary _and_ PCIEMSIAUR was programmed
> to 0x0 _and_ if the system had physical RAM at the address matching the
> value of PCIEMSIALR, a PCIe card driver could allocate a buffer with a
> physical address matching the value of PCIEMSIALR and a remote write to
> such a buffer by a PCIe card would trigger a spurious MSI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> V2: - s/it's/its/ in commit message
>     - Add R-B from Geert
> V3: - Reworded commit message and thus dropped Geerts R-B
> V4: - Add Geert's R-B again
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> index c6013f95bdb2..62d2de9fbf1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> @@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie *pcie)
>  {
>         struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
>         struct rcar_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
> -       unsigned long base;
> +       phys_addr_t base;
>         int err, i;
>
>         mutex_init(&msi->lock);
> @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie *pcie)
>         base = virt_to_phys((void *)msi->pages);
>
>         rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, base | MSIFE, PCIEMSIALR);
> -       rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, 0, PCIEMSIAUR);
> +       rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, base >> 32, PCIEMSIAUR);

As reported by 0day, this causes a warning on arm32 without LPAE:

    drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c:935:32: warning: right shift
count >= width of type

Using upper_32_bits() instead of an explicit shift should fix that.


Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-29 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-25 11:40 [PATCH V4 1/6] PCI: rcar: Clean up remaining macros defining bits marek.vasut
2019-03-25 11:40 ` [PATCH V4 2/6] PCI: rcar: Replace unsigned long with u32/unsigned int in register accessors marek.vasut
2019-03-27 11:24   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-25 11:40 ` [PATCH V4 3/6] PCI: rcar: Replace various variable types with unsigned ones for register values marek.vasut
2019-03-27 11:25   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-25 11:40 ` [PATCH V4 4/6] PCI: rcar: Replace (8 * n) with (BITS_PER_BYTE * n) marek.vasut
2019-03-25 11:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-27 11:26   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-25 11:41 ` [PATCH V4 5/6] PCI: rcar: Clean up debug messages marek.vasut
2019-03-27 11:27   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-25 11:41 ` [PATCH V4 6/6] PCI: rcar: Fix 64bit MSI message address handling marek.vasut
2019-03-27 11:30   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-27 12:22     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-28  3:03       ` Marek Vasut
2019-03-28  8:02         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-28 16:28           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-03-28 16:31             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-29  9:53               ` Marek Vasut
2019-03-29 19:32   ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2019-03-30  7:45     ` Marek Vasut
2019-03-26 13:04 ` [PATCH V4 1/6] PCI: rcar: Clean up remaining macros defining bits Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-03-26 16:48   ` Marek Vasut
2019-03-27 11:24 ` Simon Horman
2019-03-29 14:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMuHMdUEDR+oTAXeE+rjzHw5HzsjB_SerJZP4b8uDtfxTht-ew@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=horms+renesas@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).