From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com, juri.lelli@arm.com, anup@brainfault.org,
palmer@sifive.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jeremy.linton@arm.com, Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
robh+dt@kernel.org, mick@ics.forth.gr,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Unify CPU topology across ARM64 & RISC-V
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:11:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120111146.GA6497@e107155-lin> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181120111146.x4mlVJsRMgwjt7VLnaq-nJ2ce48jyVxJlxUCJh9iK4A@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07d92dd4-f943-47ee-e168-46bfaf4ed755@codeaurora.org>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:31:33AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
[...]
>
> I was interested in testing these on QDF2400, an ARM64 platform, since this
> series touches core ARM64 code and I'd hate to see a regression. However, I
> can't figure out what baseline to use to apply these. Different patches
> cause different conflicts of a variety of baselines I attempted.
>
Good to know that we can test DT configuration on QDF2400. I always assumed
it's ACPI only.
> What are these intended to apply to?
>
The series alone may not get the package/socket ids correct on QDF2400.
I have not yet added support for the same as I wanted to get the initial
feedback on DT bindings. The movement of DT binding and corresponding
code should not regress and you should be able to validate only that
part.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-20 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-09 1:50 [RFC 0/3] Unify CPU topology across ARM64 & RISC-V Atish Patra
2018-11-09 1:50 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-09 1:50 ` [RFC 1/3] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding Atish Patra
2018-11-09 1:50 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-17 16:32 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-17 16:32 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-19 17:57 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-19 17:57 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-09 1:50 ` [RFC 2/3] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code Atish Patra
2018-11-09 1:50 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-09 1:50 ` [RFC 3/3] RISC-V: Parse cpu topology during boot Atish Patra
2018-11-09 1:50 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-15 18:31 ` [RFC 0/3] Unify CPU topology across ARM64 & RISC-V Jeffrey Hugo
2018-11-15 18:31 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2018-11-19 17:46 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-19 17:46 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-20 11:11 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2018-11-20 11:11 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-11-20 15:28 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2018-11-20 15:28 ` Jeffrey Hugo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181120111146.GA6497@e107155-lin \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mick@ics.forth.gr \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).