linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] riscv: Reduce ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to 8
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 23:22:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230718152214.2907-1-jszhang@kernel.org> (raw)

Currently, riscv defines ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN as L1_CACHE_BYTES, I.E
64Bytes, if CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT=y. To support unified kernel
Image, usually we have to enable CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT, thus
it brings some bad effects to coherent platforms:

Firstly, it wastes memory, kmalloc-96, kmalloc-32, kmalloc-16 and
kmalloc-8 slab caches don't exist any more, they are replaced with
either kmalloc-128 or kmalloc-64.

Secondly, larger than necessary kmalloc aligned allocations results
in unnecessary cache/TLB pressure.

This issue also exists on arm64 platforms. From last year, Catalin
tried to solve this issue by decoupling ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN from
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, limiting kmalloc() minimum alignment to
dma_get_cache_alignment() and replacing ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN usage
in various drivers with ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN etc.[1]

One fact we can make use of for riscv: if the CPU doesn't support
ZICBOM or T-HEAD CMO, we know the platform is coherent. Based on
Catalin's work and above fact, we can easily solve the kmalloc align
issue for riscv: we can override dma_get_cache_alignment(), then let
it return ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN at the beginning and return 1 once we know
the underlying HW neither supports ZICBOM nor supports T-HEAD CMO.

So what about if the CPU supports ZICBOM or T-HEAD CMO, but all the
devices are dma coherent? Well, we use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN as the
kmalloc minimum alignment, nothing changed in this case. This case
can be improved in the future once we see such platforms in mainline.

After this patch, a simple test of booting to a small buildroot rootfs
on qemu shows:

kmalloc-96           5041    5041     96  ...
kmalloc-64           9606    9606     64  ...
kmalloc-32           5128    5128     32  ...
kmalloc-16           7682    7682     16  ...
kmalloc-8           10246   10246      8  ...

So we save about 1268KB memory. The saving will be much larger in normal
OS env on real HW platforms.


patch1 allows kmalloc() caches aligned to the smallest value.
patch2 enables DMA_BOUNCE_UNALIGNED_KMALLOC.

After this series:

As for coherent platforms, kmalloc-{8,16,32,96} caches come back on
coherent both RV32 and RV64 platforms, I.E !ZICBOM and !THEAD_CMO.

As for noncoherent RV32 platforms, nothing changed.

As for noncoherent RV64 platforms, I.E either ZICBOM or THEAD_CMO, the
above kmalloc caches also come back if > 4GB memory or users pass
"swiotlb=mmnn,force" to force swiotlb creation if <= 4GB memory. How
much mmnn should be depends on the specific platform, it needs to be
tried and tested all possible usage case on the specific hardware. For
example, I can use the minimal I/O TLB slabs on Sipeed M1S Dock.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230524171904.3967031-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com/ [1]

Since v2:
 - remove Change-Id
 - use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL
 - update Link in commit msg per Conor's suggestion
 - collect reviewed-by tag

Since v1
 - remove preparation patches since they have been merged
 - adjust Kconfig entry to keep entries sorted
 - add new function riscv_set_dma_cache_alignment() to set the
   dma_cache_alignment var.

Jisheng Zhang (2):
  riscv: allow kmalloc() caches aligned to the smallest value
  riscv: enable DMA_BOUNCE_UNALIGNED_KMALLOC for !dma_coherent

 arch/riscv/Kconfig                  |  1 +
 arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h      | 14 ++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h |  2 ++
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c           |  1 +
 arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c     |  8 ++++++++
 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+)

-- 
2.40.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2023-07-19  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 15:22 Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2023-07-18 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] riscv: allow kmalloc() caches aligned to the smallest value Jisheng Zhang
2023-07-24  7:49   ` Conor Dooley
2023-07-18 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] riscv: enable DMA_BOUNCE_UNALIGNED_KMALLOC for !dma_coherent Jisheng Zhang
2023-08-30 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] riscv: Reduce ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to 8 patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230718152214.2907-1-jszhang@kernel.org \
    --to=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).