[PATCH] dt-bindings: riscv: cpus: Clarify mmu-type interpretation

[PATCH] dt-bindings: riscv: cpus: Clarify mmu-type interpretation

[Samuel Holland]

The current description implies that only a single address translation
mode is available to the operating system. However, some implementations
support multiple address translation modes, and the operating system is
free to choose between them.

Per the RISC-V privileged specification, Sv48 implementations must also
implement Sv39, and likewise Sv57 implies support for Sv48. This means
it is possible to describe all supported address translation modes using
a single value, by naming the largest supported mode. This appears to
have been the intended usage of the property, so note it explicitly.

Fixes: 4fd669a8c487 ("dt-bindings: riscv: convert cpu binding to json-schema")
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
---

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
index f392e367d673..f166c729c482 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ properties:
 
   mmu-type:
     description:
-      Identifies the MMU address translation mode used on this
-      hart.  These values originate from the RISC-V Privileged
+      Identifies the largest MMU address translation mode supported by
+      this hart.  These values originate from the RISC-V Privileged
       Specification document, available from
       https://riscv.org/specifications/
     $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
-- 
2.42.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: riscv: cpus: Clarify mmu-type interpretation

[Conor Dooley]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 924 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 09:57:38AM -0800, Samuel Holland wrote:
> The current description implies that only a single address translation
> mode is available to the operating system. However, some implementations
> support multiple address translation modes, and the operating system is
> free to choose between them.
> 
> Per the RISC-V privileged specification, Sv48 implementations must also
> implement Sv39, and likewise Sv57 implies support for Sv48. This means
> it is possible to describe all supported address translation modes using
> a single value, by naming the largest supported mode. This appears to
> have been the intended usage of the property, so note it explicitly.
> 
> Fixes: 4fd669a8c487 ("dt-bindings: riscv: convert cpu binding to json-schema")
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>

Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.



[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: riscv: cpus: Clarify mmu-type interpretation

[patchwork-bot+linux-riscv]

Hello:

This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>:

On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 09:57:38 -0800 you wrote:
> The current description implies that only a single address translation
> mode is available to the operating system. However, some implementations
> support multiple address translation modes, and the operating system is
> free to choose between them.
> 
> Per the RISC-V privileged specification, Sv48 implementations must also
> implement Sv39, and likewise Sv57 implies support for Sv48. This means
> it is possible to describe all supported address translation modes using
> a single value, by naming the largest supported mode. This appears to
> have been the intended usage of the property, so note it explicitly.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - dt-bindings: riscv: cpus: Clarify mmu-type interpretation
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/b4070c2a242e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv