From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Maciej Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>, Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v11 03/29] KVM: Use gfn instead of hva for mmu_notifier_retry
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 19:12:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fedb8c9b-c28b-fe97-aa98-f8189067cb5a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230718234512.1690985-4-seanjc@google.com>
On 7/19/23 01:44, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> From: Chao Peng<chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
>
> Currently in mmu_notifier invalidate path, hva range is recorded and
> then checked against by mmu_notifier_retry_hva() in the page fault
> handling path. However, for the to be introduced private memory, a page
> fault may not have a hva associated, checking gfn(gpa) makes more sense.
>
> For existing hva based shared memory, gfn is expected to also work. The
> only downside is when aliasing multiple gfns to a single hva, the
> current algorithm of checking multiple ranges could result in a much
> larger range being rejected. Such aliasing should be uncommon, so the
> impact is expected small.
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson<seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng<chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba<tabba@google.com>
> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba<tabba@google.com>
> [sean: convert vmx_set_apic_access_page_addr() to gfn-based API]
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson<seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 10 ++++++----
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 11 +++++------
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index d72f2b20f430..b034727c4cf9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -3087,7 +3087,7 @@ static void direct_pte_prefetch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
> *
> * There are several ways to safely use this helper:
> *
> - * - Check mmu_invalidate_retry_hva() after grabbing the mapping level, before
> + * - Check mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn() after grabbing the mapping level, before
> * consuming it. In this case, mmu_lock doesn't need to be held during the
> * lookup, but it does need to be held while checking the MMU notifier.
> *
> @@ -4400,7 +4400,7 @@ static bool is_page_fault_stale(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return true;
>
> return fault->slot &&
> - mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(vcpu->kvm, fault->mmu_seq, fault->hva);
> + mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(vcpu->kvm, fault->mmu_seq, fault->gfn);
> }
>
> static int direct_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> @@ -6301,7 +6301,9 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
>
> write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>
> - kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(kvm, 0, -1ul);
> + kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(kvm);
> +
> + kvm_mmu_invalidate_range_add(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
>
> flush = kvm_rmap_zap_gfn_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
>
> @@ -6314,7 +6316,7 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
> if (flush)
> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end - gfn_start);
>
> - kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(kvm, 0, -1ul);
> + kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(kvm);
>
> write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 0ecf4be2c6af..946380b53cf5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -6729,10 +6729,10 @@ static void vmx_set_apic_access_page_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return;
>
> /*
> - * Grab the memslot so that the hva lookup for the mmu_notifier retry
> - * is guaranteed to use the same memslot as the pfn lookup, i.e. rely
> - * on the pfn lookup's validation of the memslot to ensure a valid hva
> - * is used for the retry check.
> + * Explicitly grab the memslot using KVM's internal slot ID to ensure
> + * KVM doesn't unintentionally grab a userspace memslot. It_should_
> + * be impossible for userspace to create a memslot for the APIC when
> + * APICv is enabled, but paranoia won't hurt in this case.
> */
> slot = id_to_memslot(slots, APIC_ACCESS_PAGE_PRIVATE_MEMSLOT);
> if (!slot || slot->flags & KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID)
> @@ -6757,8 +6757,7 @@ static void vmx_set_apic_access_page_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return;
>
> read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> - if (mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(kvm, mmu_seq,
> - gfn_to_hva_memslot(slot, gfn))) {
> + if (mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(kvm, mmu_seq, gfn)) {
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_APIC_PAGE_RELOAD, vcpu);
> read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> goto out;
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index b901571ab61e..90a0be261a5c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -788,8 +788,8 @@ struct kvm {
> struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
> unsigned long mmu_invalidate_seq;
> long mmu_invalidate_in_progress;
> - unsigned long mmu_invalidate_range_start;
> - unsigned long mmu_invalidate_range_end;
> + gfn_t mmu_invalidate_range_start;
> + gfn_t mmu_invalidate_range_end;
> #endif
> struct list_head devices;
> u64 manual_dirty_log_protect;
> @@ -1371,10 +1371,9 @@ void kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
> void *kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
> #endif
>
> -void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end);
> -void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end);
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_range_add(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> long kvm_arch_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg);
> @@ -1940,9 +1939,9 @@ static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mmu_seq)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
> unsigned long mmu_seq,
> - unsigned long hva)
> + gfn_t gfn)
> {
> lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> /*
> @@ -1951,10 +1950,20 @@ static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(struct kvm *kvm,
> * that might be being invalidated. Note that it may include some false
> * positives, due to shortcuts when handing concurrent invalidations.
> */
> - if (unlikely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress) &&
> - hva >= kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start &&
> - hva < kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end)
> - return 1;
> + if (unlikely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress)) {
> + /*
> + * Dropping mmu_lock after bumping mmu_invalidate_in_progress
> + * but before updating the range is a KVM bug.
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start == INVALID_GPA ||
> + kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end == INVALID_GPA))
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (gfn >= kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start &&
> + gfn < kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end)
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> if (kvm->mmu_invalidate_seq != mmu_seq)
> return 1;
> return 0;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 50aea855eeae..8101b11a13ba 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -518,9 +518,7 @@ static inline struct kvm *mmu_notifier_to_kvm(struct mmu_notifier *mn)
>
> typedef bool (*gfn_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
>
> -typedef void (*on_lock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end);
> -
> +typedef void (*on_lock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm);
> typedef void (*on_unlock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range {
> @@ -617,7 +615,8 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> locked = true;
> KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
> if (!IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_lock))
> - range->on_lock(kvm, range->start, range->end);
> + range->on_lock(kvm);
> +
> if (IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->handler))
> break;
> }
> @@ -721,15 +720,26 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> kvm_handle_hva_range(mn, address, address + 1, pte, kvm_change_spte_gfn);
> }
>
> -void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end)
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> /*
> * The count increase must become visible at unlock time as no
> * spte can be established without taking the mmu_lock and
> * count is also read inside the mmu_lock critical section.
> */
> kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress++;
> +
> + if (likely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress == 1))
> + kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start = INVALID_GPA;
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_range_add(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress);
> +
> if (likely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress == 1)) {
> kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start = start;
> kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end = end;
> @@ -750,6 +760,12 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> }
> }
>
> +static bool kvm_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> +{
> + kvm_mmu_invalidate_range_add(kvm, range->start, range->end);
> + return kvm_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, range);
> +}
> +
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-19 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 131+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-18 23:44 [RFC PATCH v11 00/29] KVM: guest_memfd() and per-page attributes Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 01/29] KVM: Wrap kvm_gfn_range.pte in a per-action union Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 13:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-07-19 15:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 16:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-26 20:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 6:26 ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-21 10:45 ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-25 18:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 02/29] KVM: Tweak kvm_hva_range and hva_handler_t to allow reusing for gfn ranges Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 03/29] KVM: Use gfn instead of hva for mmu_notifier_retry Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:12 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 04/29] KVM: PPC: Drop dead code related to KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 05/29] KVM: Convert KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER to CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 7:31 ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-19 14:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 1:15 ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 06/29] KVM: Introduce KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 9:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-28 9:25 ` Quentin Perret
2023-07-29 0:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-31 9:30 ` Quentin Perret
2023-07-31 15:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 07/29] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 7:54 ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-19 14:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 08/29] KVM: Introduce per-page memory attributes Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 8:09 ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-20 19:02 ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-20 20:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 10:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 15:56 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-24 4:43 ` Xu Yilun
2023-07-26 15:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-27 3:24 ` Xu Yilun
2023-08-02 20:31 ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-08-14 0:44 ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-14 21:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 09/29] KVM: x86: Disallow hugepages when memory attributes are mixed Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 11:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 17:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 10/29] mm: Add AS_UNMOVABLE to mark mapping as completely unmovable Sean Christopherson
2023-07-25 10:24 ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2023-07-25 12:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-07-26 11:36 ` Kirill A . Shutemov
2023-07-28 16:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-28 16:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-09-01 8:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 11/29] security: Export security_inode_init_security_anon() for use by KVM Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 2:14 ` Paul Moore
2023-07-31 10:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 12/29] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 17:21 ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-07-19 17:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 14:45 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-20 15:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-20 21:28 ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-21 6:13 ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-21 22:27 ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-21 22:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:05 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 15:42 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-07-21 17:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 17:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 17:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-25 15:09 ` Wang, Wei W
2023-07-25 16:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 1:51 ` Wang, Wei W
2023-07-31 16:23 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-26 17:18 ` Elliot Berman
2023-07-26 19:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-27 10:39 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-07-27 17:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-31 13:46 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-08-03 19:15 ` Ryan Afranji
2023-08-07 23:06 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-08 21:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-10 23:57 ` Vishal Annapurve
2023-08-11 17:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-15 18:43 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-15 20:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-21 17:30 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-21 19:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-28 22:56 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-29 2:53 ` Elliot Berman
2023-09-14 19:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14 18:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14 23:19 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-09-15 0:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-30 15:12 ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-30 16:44 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-09-01 3:45 ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-01 16:46 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 13/29] KVM: Add transparent hugepage support for dedicated guest memory Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-21 17:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-06 22:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 14/29] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for private memory Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 15/29] KVM: Drop superfluous __KVM_VCPU_MULTIPLE_ADDRESS_SPACE macro Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH v11 16/29] KVM: Allow arch code to track number of memslot address spaces per VM Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 17/29] KVM: x86: Add support for "protected VMs" that can utilize private memory Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 18/29] KVM: selftests: Drop unused kvm_userspace_memory_region_find() helper Sean Christopherson
2023-07-21 15:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 19/29] KVM: selftests: Convert lib's mem regions to KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 20/29] KVM: selftests: Add support for creating private memslots Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 21/29] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to convert guest memory b/w private and shared Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 22/29] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to do KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE hypercalls (x86) Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 23/29] KVM: selftests: Introduce VM "shape" to allow tests to specify the VM type Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 24/29] KVM: selftests: Add GUEST_SYNC[1-6] macros for synchronizing more data Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 25/29] KVM: selftests: Add x86-only selftest for private memory conversions Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 26/29] KVM: selftests: Add KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 helper Sean Christopherson
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 27/29] KVM: selftests: Expand set_memory_region_test to validate guest_memfd() Sean Christopherson
2023-08-07 23:17 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 28/29] KVM: selftests: Add basic selftest for guest_memfd() Sean Christopherson
2023-08-07 23:20 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-18 23:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-07 23:25 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-08-18 23:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-21 19:49 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-07-18 23:45 ` [RFC PATCH v11 29/29] KVM: selftests: Test KVM exit behavior for private memory/access Sean Christopherson
2023-07-24 6:38 ` [RFC PATCH v11 00/29] KVM: guest_memfd() and per-page attributes Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-24 17:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-26 11:20 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-07-26 14:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-27 6:42 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-08-03 11:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fedb8c9b-c28b-fe97-aa98-f8189067cb5a@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).