linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@gmail.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	dunc.mcphie@gmail.com, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:30:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD56B7fAsv-f8nnZE9OXzdomsYfcvOOaFun1bh57dLt6Ee3ZFA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a7ca4nh6.fsf@linutronix.de>

> Where in this trace is there a latency spike? I could not see one.
Hi John,

For the 5.2.0-rt1 trace data set I believe the latency is with
cyclicte-1935 at the end. If I just look at the "cyclicte-1935 ...
finish_task_switch <-__schedule" lines then the delta-t's are mostly
around 200us except for the last delta-t which is >5000us
cyclicte-1935    1d...3.. 84243668us : uao_thread_switch <-__switch_to
cyclicte-1935    1d...3.. 84249436us : finish_task_switch <-__schedule

The actual cyclictest output is shown below:
# ./cyclictest -S -m -n -p 99 -i 200 -h 700 -f -b 5000
# /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0us
INFO: debugfs mountpoint: /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
policy: fifo: loadavg: 5.55 1.84 0.66 11/136 1941

T: 0 ( 1934) P:99 I:200 C: 411188 Min:     30 Act:   30 Avg:   93 Max:     652
T: 1 ( 1935) P:99 I:200 C: 382925 Min:     47 Act: 5713 Avg:  123 Max:    5713
T: 2 ( 1936) P:99 I:200 C: 395011 Min:     40 Act:   40 Avg:  117 Max:     561
T: 3 ( 1937) P:99 I:200 C: 392379 Min:     36 Act:   36 Avg:  109 Max:     636

thanks,
Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-15 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-12 11:18 poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 Paul Thomas
     [not found] ` <CAD56B7c2=95r7r-6tr0Mby8jSeuQPDNSd4LELnUw1LVRn9Rqew@mail.gmail.com>
2019-07-12 11:32   ` Paul Thomas
2019-07-16 20:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-16 21:50   ` Paul Thomas
2019-07-16 23:14     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-17  0:44       ` Paul Thomas
2019-07-17  8:03         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-17  8:10           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-17  9:02             ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-17 10:21               ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-17 22:28                 ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-13  9:53                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-13 18:02                     ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-14 11:26                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 16:17                         ` [PATCH RT] arm64: preempt: Check preemption level before looking at lazy-preempt Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 16:17                         ` [PATCH RT] x86: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 17:04                         ` poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 Paul Thomas
2019-08-15  8:29                           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-15 12:33                             ` John Ogness
2019-08-15 13:30                               ` Paul Thomas [this message]
2019-08-15 13:42                               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-15 13:52                                 ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-15 14:19                                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-15 15:12                                     ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-15 15:15                                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-15 15:31                                         ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-15 18:00                     ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-15 18:57                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAD56B7fAsv-f8nnZE9OXzdomsYfcvOOaFun1bh57dLt6Ee3ZFA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pthomas8589@gmail.com \
    --cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dunc.mcphie@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).