From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: Simplify the calculation of variables
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 14:08:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202203281418.KxPHz4Ek-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1648434982-28862-1-git-send-email-baihaowen@meizu.com>
Hi Haowen,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on s390/features]
[also build test ERROR on v5.17 next-20220325]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Haowen-Bai/s390-Simplify-the-calculation-of-variables/20220328-103807
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features
config: s390-randconfig-r044-20220327 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220328/202203281418.KxPHz4Ek-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/7356660d5a4a5dc70f5e18b63125c43d218885f3
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Haowen-Bai/s390-Simplify-the-calculation-of-variables/20220328-103807
git checkout 7356660d5a4a5dc70f5e18b63125c43d218885f3
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/iio/accel/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h:18,
from arch/s390/include/asm/chpid.h:10,
from arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h:20,
from arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h:12,
from include/linux/pci.h:1901,
from arch/s390/include/asm/hw_irq.h:6,
from include/linux/irq.h:592,
from include/linux/iio/trigger.h:6,
from drivers/iio/accel/adxl355_core.c:14:
arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h: In function 'scsw_tm_is_valid_pno':
>> arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h:695:54: error: expected ';' before '}' token
695 | (scsw->tm.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED))
| ^
| ;
696 | }
| ~
--
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h:18,
from arch/s390/include/asm/chpid.h:10,
from arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h:20,
from arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h:12,
from include/linux/pci.h:1901,
from arch/s390/include/asm/hw_irq.h:6,
from include/linux/irq.h:592,
from include/linux/iio/trigger.h:6,
from drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c:21:
arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h: In function 'scsw_tm_is_valid_pno':
>> arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h:695:54: error: expected ';' before '}' token
695 | (scsw->tm.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED))
| ^
| ;
696 | }
| ~
At top level:
drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c:1709:36: warning: 'kx_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
1709 | static const struct acpi_device_id kx_acpi_match[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h:18,
from arch/s390/include/asm/chpid.h:10,
from arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h:20,
from arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h:12,
from include/linux/pci.h:1901,
from arch/s390/include/asm/hw_irq.h:6,
from include/linux/irq.h:592,
from include/linux/iio/trigger.h:6,
from drivers/iio/accel/mxc4005.c:14:
arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h: In function 'scsw_tm_is_valid_pno':
>> arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h:695:54: error: expected ';' before '}' token
695 | (scsw->tm.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED))
| ^
| ;
696 | }
| ~
At top level:
drivers/iio/accel/mxc4005.c:473:36: warning: 'mxc4005_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
473 | static const struct acpi_device_id mxc4005_acpi_match[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h:18,
from arch/s390/include/asm/chpid.h:10,
from arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h:20,
from arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h:12,
from include/linux/pci.h:1901,
from arch/s390/include/asm/hw_irq.h:6,
from include/linux/irq.h:592,
from include/linux/iio/trigger.h:6,
from drivers/iio/accel/stk8ba50.c:18:
arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h: In function 'scsw_tm_is_valid_pno':
>> arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h:695:54: error: expected ';' before '}' token
695 | (scsw->tm.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED))
| ^
| ;
696 | }
| ~
At top level:
drivers/iio/accel/stk8ba50.c:539:36: warning: 'stk8ba50_acpi_id' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
539 | static const struct acpi_device_id stk8ba50_acpi_id[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +695 arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h
682
683 /**
684 * scsw_tm_is_valid_pno - check pno field validity
685 * @scsw: pointer to scsw
686 *
687 * Return non-zero if the pno field of the specified transport mode scsw is
688 * valid, zero otherwise.
689 */
690 static inline int scsw_tm_is_valid_pno(union scsw *scsw)
691 {
692 return (scsw->tm.fctl != 0) &&
693 (scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND) &&
694 (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) ||
> 695 (scsw->tm.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED))
696 }
697
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 2:36 [PATCH] s390: Simplify the calculation of variables Haowen Bai
2022-03-28 5:37 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-28 6:08 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-03-28 12:15 ` David Laight
2022-04-04 9:10 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-04-06 2:37 ` [PATCH V2] " Haowen Bai
2022-04-06 8:45 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-04-06 16:44 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2022-04-07 2:16 ` [PATCH V3] " Haowen Bai
2022-04-08 12:53 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2022-04-08 14:32 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-04-07 2:19 ` [PATCH V2] " baihaowen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-01 10:32 [PATCH] " Jiapeng Chong
2021-01-26 9:09 Jiapeng Zhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202203281418.KxPHz4Ek-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=baihaowen@meizu.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).